Supreme Court Upholds Trump Travel Ban

[Farmer Br0wn]

Pathetic answers. They have had TWO years to have a plan that could have been implemented today after the SC ruling and hit the ground running. They had two years that could have devised a plan and two years to research the legality of it, but they've done zero.

They haven't worked on one at all. So will we have one in 90 days?

This is a sad change of tactics.

The left two days ago: "Trumps travel ban is racist, it must be stopped at all costs!!! REEEEEEEEE!!!!!!"

The left today: "Why isn't Trumps travel ban completely set up and ready to go within the same day of a Supreme Court ruling???? REEEEEEEEE!!!!"

Quit pretending like that's something you even care about. You dont.

President Trump will release the full implementation for the travel ban, when President Trump is damn well ready.

 

[bushman505]

Finally, the Proclamation properly identifies a “class of aliens” whose entry is suspended, and the word “class” comfortably encompasses a group of people linked by nationality. Pp. 10–15."

Yawn

 

[*Z*]

Luckily, yes.

Has it been on hold? We haven't been blown up by terrorists so I assume it's been in effect.

 

[Hard To Tell]

Anyone who opposes strict vetting and restrictions on Muslim immigration is either,
a) A moron.
b) Someone who actually wants to see harm come to their fellow citizens.

 

[BoxingFan653]

Liberals so sad that they’re gonna have to wait to show off their sharia law skills

 

[Big Nasty Edison]

This is a sad change of tactics.

The left two days ago: "Trumps travel ban is racist, it must be stopped at all costs!!! REEEEEEEEE!!!!!!"

The left today: "Why isn't Trumps travel ban completely set up and ready to go within the same day of a Supreme Court ruling???? REEEEEEEEE!!!!"

Quit pretending like that's something you even care about. You dont.

President Trump will release the full implementation for the travel ban, when President Trump is damn well ready.

Try to follow along. Might be hard for you but I'll try to assist you.

>Stated reason to ban people from majority muslim countries was to institute a vetting program.
>Two years later not one single ounce of research or analysis has gone into a vetting program.
>Therefore purpose of ban on people from Muslim majority countries wasn't ACTUALLY for a travel ban and that's wolf tickets.

 

[Seaside]

Anyone who opposes strict vetting and restrictions on Muslim immigration is either,
a) A moron.
b) Someone who actually wants to see harm come to their fellow citizens.

All of subsaharan africa except for socialist pardaise and anti muslim Angola and some other small countries should be banned. And yes should outright block all immigration from pakistan, north africa etc. But i know US wont do that to pakistan because it is your pretend ally.

You wont pass ban against UAE, Kuwait, saudis, jordan, egypt, pakistan, turkey, indonesia or malaysia. But you could pass ban against most the on fire dumps in subsaharan africa and against libya, sudan, eritrea, somalia, iraq, syria. etc.

 

[Seaside]

Yawn.

where are you really from? country. No way you are Russian and if so you are 100% have to be far left and lgtbqi who wants to immigrate to sweden or germany my guess.

 

[essie]

where are you really from? country. No way you are Russian and if so you are 100% have to be far left and lgtbqi who wants to immigrate to sweden or germany my guess.

I have Russia 2018 cause of the world cup going on right now...lol. I'm in America.

 

[Smok3r]

So when are we gonna get that amazing new EXTREME vetting program?

Not sure, but Uncle Sam should start by vetting some of the libs on this board, yourself included.

 

[Rational Poster]

Not sure, but Uncle Sam should start by vetting some of the libs on this board, yourself included.

But the whole point of the ban was for the extreme vetting program.

It's been two years where is the new program? Its been nearly 4x longer than they said they would need.

 

[Johnny Mac]

This smells like Freedom and Winning!

 

[Rational Poster]

This smells like Freedom and Winning!

It's actually a restriction of travel which is the opposite of freedom.

 

[Johnny Mac]

Democrat party loves Islam more than the Red White and Blue.....so this is not a good day for Democrats. Thank God for Trump!

 

[Big Nasty Edison]

Not sure, but Uncle Sam should start by vetting some of the libs on this board, yourself included.

 

[Rational Poster]

This is a sad change of tactics.

The left two days ago: "Trumps travel ban is racist, it must be stopped at all costs!!! REEEEEEEEE!!!!!!"

The left today: "Why isn't Trumps travel ban completely set up and ready to go within the same day of a Supreme Court ruling???? REEEEEEEEE!!!!"

Quit pretending like that's something you even care about. You dont.

President Trump will release the full implementation for the travel ban, when President Trump is damn well ready.

You completely misunderstand (natediaz.gif).

The entire justification for the travel ban was to implement a vetting plan. Why do they need to wait on the ban to work on the new vetting requirements? If we're in such danger why not just work on the extreme vetting program instead of fighting over the ban? The ban was not necessary for a change in vetting policy.

It's been two years and there is no extreme vetting plan. I guess Trump is fine leaving us all in danger.

 

[Smok3r]

But the whole point of the ban was for the extreme vetting program.

It's been two years where is the new program? Its been nearly 4x longer than they said they would need.

No need for a new program. What we have in place suffices. Only problem is we haven’t been enforcing our existing policies/laws.

We were fed cake and ice cream for 8 years...time for some veggies!

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

Try to follow along. Might be hard for you but I'll try to assist you.

>Stated reason to ban people from majority muslim countries was to institute a vetting program.
>Two years later not one single ounce of research or analysis has gone into a vetting program.
>Therefore purpose of ban on people from Muslim majority countries wasn't ACTUALLY for a travel ban and that's wolf tickets.

Why don't you tell us what you think the purpose of the ban ACTUALLY is?

I suspect you're going to get it wrong, and come back with boilerplate leftist accusations.

 

[Bargey]

Full decision here:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/17-965_h315.pdf

5-4.

The dissent of Sotomayor/Ginsburg in this case is an embarrassment to our nation. They cite Trump's stump speeches at length and attempt to prove that he had unconstitutional motivations for the executive order. These people are operating far outside of a rules-based framework. Their job is is to evaluate whether the policy itself violated the Constitution or other federal law, not whether Trump's motivations were worthy of criticism.

Is there a constitutional basis or any basis to get rid of partisan judge/s who have crept into derangement territory with their rulings? Clearly Sotomayor and Ginsberg are in that territory.

 

[BudKing8806]

But the whole point of the ban was for the extreme vetting program.

It's been two years where is the new program? Its been nearly 4x longer than they said they would need.

Maybe they will just push it out indefinitely.