Summery in March (SCO v 31)

[bobgeese]

I'll enjoy it going back to a witch hunt.

Don't you think Barr would have backed up his opinions in his report if he could have? He had 300+ pages and he couldn't note one full sentence that helped his boss?

His opinion?

Where do you goofs get this shit.


That was the conclusion of the Meuller report. Are you insinuating Meuller is sitting by like a coward while Barr misrepresents his findings?

 

[waiguoren]

Are you insinuating Meuller is sitting by like a coward while Barr misrepresents his findings?

I think that's pretty much what is happening, yes.

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

It's not an investigation. It's just redactions.

The Attorney General has to investigate the contents of the report.

You're going to have to just sit, and wait, until the Attorney General has given the report a thorough review, and decides to release the portions that doesn't violate anyone's right to privacy.

If you don't like it, tough shit.

 

[bobgeese]

I think that's pretty much what is happening, yes.

At least BarryDingle has come out and stated “it’s looking that way”.


It’s downright fascinating to see the breadth of reactions to the Meuller report.

 

[vengeful]

If we find out Barr misrepresented the report he should be removed

I dont think he misrepresented the report, I just don't think there's no evidence of collusion in the report, just that it's not enough to bring charges against anyone. He's a Trump appointee, it's his job to make the report look as good as possible for his boss.

 

[method115]

I dont think he misrepresented the report, I just don't think there's no evidence of collusion in the report, just that it's not enough to bring charges against anyone. He's a Trump appointee, it's his job to make the report look as good as possible for his boss.

I guess it depends on your view of what evidence is. If meeting with Russians or talking to them is evidence then yes I'm sure they'll be plenty of that.

 

[waiguoren]

I dont think he misrepresented the report, I just don't think there's no evidence of collusion in the report, just that it's not enough to bring charges against anyone. He's a Trump appointee, it's his job to make the report look as good as possible for his boss.

Barr represents the DOJ, which is a department of prosecutors. Their job is to find crime. "Collusion" is not a crime in this context, and therefore the word "collusion" does not appear anywhere in the Barr letter. Barr's letter addressed the two potential crimes that the Mueller investigation attempted to implicate Trump in: conspiracy and obstruction of justice.

 

[Andy Capp]

You want him to prove unverified accusations false? You sound like Alex Jones

As usual, your logic is bad. Try again.

 

[andnowweknow]

His opinion?

Where do you goofs get this shit.


That was the conclusion of the Meuller report. Are you insinuating Meuller is sitting by like a coward while Barr misrepresents his findings?

Looks like we're all going to see it, no opinions will be necessary at that point.

 

[SBJJ]

As usual, your logic is bad. Try again.

Nope. It's bad to ask people to prove unverified accusations false if your Name is Alex Jones or if you are partisan extremist on a karate forum

 

[andnowweknow]

I guess it depends on your view of what evidence is. If meeting with Russians or talking to them is evidence then yes I'm sure they'll be plenty of that.

Mueller's report will define what evidence is, it will not require parsing thought, only comprehension of the text.

 

[SBJJ]

I dont think he misrepresented the report, I just don't think there's no evidence of collusion in the report, just that it's not enough to bring charges against anyone. He's a Trump appointee, it's his job to make the report look as good as possible for his boss.

If you can't bring charges against anyone in the campaign with what your mission is. Then that is essentially exoneration. Especially if u specifically state the campaign actually turned down attempts

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

Looks like we're all going to see it, no opinions will be necessary at that point.

^^^^^^^^

Denial stage of grief.

 

[andnowweknow]

^^^^^^^^

Denial stage of grief.

Barr gave you guys a few weeks...get it out now

 

[andnowweknow]

If you can't bring charges against anyone in the campaign with what your mission is. Then that is essentially exoneration. Especially if u specifically state the campaign actually turned down attempts

Are you color blind?

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

Barr gave you guys a few weeks...get it out now

I'm not the one desperately hanging on to a delusion, that would be you:

 

[waiguoren]

House Intelligence Committee Republicans Ask Adam Schiff to Step Down as Chairman

by Kristina Wong

House Intelligence Committee Republicans unveiled during a hearing on Thursday a letter signed by all Republicans on the committee asking Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) to step down as chairman.
Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX) announced the letter during the hearing, which is the first since Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation ended, finding that President Trump’s campaign did not collude with Russia.

Conaway, who led the committee’s Russia probe last year, read from the letter to Schiff:

Your willingness to continue to promote a demonstrably false narrative is alarming. The findings of the Special Counsel conclusively refute your past and present assertions, and have exposed you as having abused your position to knowingly promote false information.

Having damaged the integrity of this committee, and having undermined the faith in the United States government and its institutions, your actions both past and present are incompatible with your duty as chairman of this committee, which alone in the House of Representatives has the obligation and authority to provide effective oversight of the U.S. intelligence community.

As such, we have no faith in your ability to discharge your duties in a manner consistent with your Constitutional responsibility and urge your immediate resignation as Chairman of this Committee.
​

The letter is especially stunning coming from all GOP members of the committee, including moderate Republicans such as Reps. Will Hurd (R-TX) and Elise Stefanik (R-NY).

Their voices join House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) in calling for Schiff’s resignation as chairman. White House adviser Kellyanne Conway has called on Schiff to resign from Congress altogether.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...ans-ask-adam-schiff-to-step-down-as-chairman/

 

[andnowweknow]

I'm not the one desperately hanging on to a delusion, that would be you:

I laughed, mostly because the incel that made this probably thinks Barr's letter was the Mueller report.

 

[MikeMcMann]

Nope. It's bad to ask people to prove unverified accusations false if your Name is Alex Jones or if you are partisan extremist on a karate forum

As usual, your logic is bad. Try again.

There is no doubt the Steele Dossier has proved a credible road map doc of raw intelligence that, as all raw does, requires follow up and substantiation. In almost all key areas followed and investigated its assertions have proved founded in a large degree of fact and accurate. In a rare few (Cohen, Prague, etc) it has not.

Any assertion that such clear written claims such as in the Dossier cannot be disproves or shown to have no substantiation is just disingenuous spin.


------------------



As we noted, our interest is in assessing the Steele dossier as a raw intelligence document, not a finished piece of analysis.

. And even where the details are not exact, the general thrust of Steele’s reporting seems credible in light of what we now know about extensive contacts between numerous individuals associated with the Trump campaign and Russian government officials.

However, there is also a good deal in the dossier that has not been corroborated in the official record and perhaps never will be—whether because it’s untrue, unimportant or too sensitive. As a raw intelligence document, the Steele dossier, we believe, holds up well so far.

THE RUSSIA CONNECTION
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective

 

[andnowweknow]

House Intelligence Committee Republicans Ask Adam Schiff to Step Down as Chairman

by Kristina Wong

House Intelligence Committee Republicans unveiled during a hearing on Thursday a letter signed by all Republicans on the committee asking Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) to step down as chairman.
Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX) announced the letter during the hearing, which is the first since Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation ended, finding that President Trump’s campaign did not collude with Russia.

Conaway, who led the committee’s Russia probe last year, read from the letter to Schiff:

Your willingness to continue to promote a demonstrably false narrative is alarming. The findings of the Special Counsel conclusively refute your past and present assertions, and have exposed you as having abused your position to knowingly promote false information.

Having damaged the integrity of this committee, and having undermined the faith in the United States government and its institutions, your actions both past and present are incompatible with your duty as chairman of this committee, which alone in the House of Representatives has the obligation and authority to provide effective oversight of the U.S. intelligence community.

As such, we have no faith in your ability to discharge your duties in a manner consistent with your Constitutional responsibility and urge your immediate resignation as Chairman of this Committee.
​

The letter is especially stunning coming from all GOP members of the committee, including moderate Republicans such as Reps. Will Hurd (R-TX) and Elise Stefanik (R-NY).

Their voices join House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) and Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) in calling for Schiff’s resignation as chairman. White House adviser Kellyanne Conway has called on Schiff to resign from Congress altogether.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...ans-ask-adam-schiff-to-step-down-as-chairman/

I wonder if he'll step down? Seems compelling.