Summery in March (SCO v 31)

So reporting from the NYT has the report as confirmed at over 300 pages. And not one sentence of that in the Barr report.
 
bobgeese said:
<TrumpWrong1>


Do you brainlets even follow the news?

Steele literally used anonymous CNN user comments as a “source”.

<36><36><36>


Let me guess, those pee pee tapes are comin out any day now, right?
Click to expand...
Why don't you post some actual substantiated information that falsifies the dossier rather than continuing to shit up the forum with empty bullshit posts? How you have managed to continuously post like this and not get banned is beyond me but I'm still reasonably sure it's only a matter of time.

tl;dr GFY, you're a waste of time and space.
 
Ophydian said:
Yes yes how many times has Trump said he was going to release something and the silence
Click to expand...
I'll bet you he does release them within the next six months. I don't think you'll take the bet.
 
Is it me or do republican supporters posting ITT have 1) no desire to see the Mueller report itself as unredacted as possible and 2) not a sceptical bone in their body regarding the Barr (of Iran-Contra fame) interpretation?
 
andnowweknow said:
So reporting from the NYT has the report as confirmed at over 300 pages. And not one sentence of that in the Barr report.
Click to expand...

The lesson people like Greenwald learned from the Iraq war is that people in the media should blindly trust the administration when it is giving a vague, self-serving description of information that isn't available to the public.
 
andnowweknow said:
So reporting from the NYT has the report as confirmed at over 300 pages. And not one sentence of that in the Barr report.
Click to expand...
Yeah, the Barr Report is basically 2 pages, you can't even summarize a college paper in 2 pages. I mean technically it's 4 pages, but the 1st page was just addresses of the Congressmen it was going to, and the last pages was basically like footnotes.

A thorough summary that would be needed for something like this should have been at least 30 pages.
 
Jack V Savage said:
The lesson people like Greenwald learned from the Iraq war is that people in the media should blindly trust the administration when it is giving a vague, self-serving description of information that isn't available to the public.
Click to expand...
Seriously, it's fucking baffling.
 
Ophydian said:
Yes yes how many times has Trump said he was going to release something and the silence
Click to expand...



Yup, those tax returns are going to be released any day now...

th
 
FIMN said:
Is it me or do republican supporters posting ITT have 1) no desire to see the Mueller report itself as unredacted as possible
Click to expand...

I am not a Republican, but I want to see the totally unredacted form of the Mueller report.

FIMN said:
not a sceptical bone in their body regarding the Barr (of Iran-Contra fame) interpretation?
Click to expand...

We should be skeptical of everyone. That said, it seems highly unlikely that Barr would risk his entire reputation by mischaracterizing the Mueller report, particularly since Mueller has a recent history of speaking out when his investigation has been mischaracterized.
 
Looking forward to the report being released and the lib line switching to, “we need to see the underlying documents! We can’t just trust Mueller’s word!”
 
Bloody Pulp said:
Looking forward to the report being released and the lib line switching to, “we need to see the underlying documents! We can’t just trust Mueller’s word!”
Click to expand...
I think those people are just going to obsess over loose ends that Mueller couldn't piece together. 2,800+ subpoenas, 500+ search warrants, 230+ orders for communication records....it's going to be a conspiracy theorist's wet dream, even in redacted form.
 
Bobby 3 Sticks said:
Judge Nap thinks there's something damning in the Mueller report...

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profil...-and-some-evidence-of-obstruction-of-justice/



Wonder how much longer Nap will be allowed on Fox
Click to expand...

Like I said before to those spazzing out about no collusion. The four page report from the AG Says there’s no reason to move forward with collusion but that doesn’t mean there isnt evidence be at circumstantial that Congress can move forward with that information. I think it was pretty much a given that Mueller would not indict a sitting president but that he would give enough data to Congress to move forward if they so wish to
 
Hunter Simpson said:
*were LOL

But seriously, it's not a CT because it's not a theory--hell it's not even a hypothesis. I've never even read it. What I have read is documented examples of corroboration and what I have not read is any part of it being falsified in any meaningful way. On a different day, I'd say, specify this "mostly bullshit" and specify this mostly bullshit's relevance to the parts that were already corroborated. But that would be just indulging you in deflecting from the point, wouldn't it? As @Jack V Savage has helpfully pointed out numerous times despite being ignored every time, the "dossier" was nothing more than raw intelligence that perforce would need to be corroborated to serve as "evidence" of anything. Just as I said over and over during the Cohen trial, of course no one is just going to take his word for anything, but once corroborated it is effectively shown to be factual and trustworthy and that is what matters.


I would really like to know if you're actually not smart enough to have understood that already or if you're just playing dumb, but I won't hold my breath waiting for that answer.
Click to expand...

You must also believe in Pizzagate.
 
Hunter Simpson said:
Why don't you post some actual substantiated information that falsifies the dossier rather than continuing to shit up the forum with empty bullshit posts? How you have managed to continuously post like this and not get banned is beyond me but I'm still reasonably sure it's only a matter of time.

tl;dr GFY, you're a waste of time and space.
Click to expand...



These are the tears I crave. Thanks

<5>


Your inability to address the fact that Steele used literal anonymous cnn user comments as a source, is transparent as can be.

But please, continue to lash out in anger.

{<jimmies}
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,282,737
Messages
58,457,042
Members
176,040
Latest member
jaybuff

Share this page

Back
Top