Summery in March (SCO v 31)

[andnowweknow]

Usually if a prosecutor actually exonerates someone it means little to no evidence.

As for punting the obstruction to the Justice dept. Idk, just a pussy move imo

Barr decided to make his opinion known on the matter, there is no indication that Mueller had any intention for him to make any opinion. It's Barr's right to say whatever he wants, but to say Mueller punted to him is likely to turn out to be not exactly what happened.

As for Mueller not deciding, given the implications, and the fact no sitting president will be indicted, the only recourse is congressional...which will likely turn out to be what Mueller had in mind. TO CONGRESS (not Barr): "here's the evidence, up to you what you do with it".

Fair to me.

 

[andnowweknow]

The difference being, Bill Clinton was actually guilty of a felony, he committed it on film, under oath, for all the world to see:



Meanwhile, President Trump is basking in the sunlight of exoneration.

literally nobody should engage with a liar. Trump and you. The letter EXPLICITLY, from his own cabinet member no less, DOES NOT exonerate him.

 

[SBJJ]

Barr decided to make his opinion known on the matter, there is no indication that Mueller had any intention for him to make any opinion. It's Barr's right to say whatever he wants, but to say Mueller punted to him is likely to turn out to be not exactly what happened.

As for Mueller not deciding, given the implications, and the fact no sitting president will be indicted, the only recourse is congressional...which will likely turn out to be what Mueller had in mind. TO CONGRESS (not Barr): "here's the evidence, up to you what you do with it".

Fair to me.

Yea. So in other words.......

A pussy move

 

[SBJJ]

literally nobody should engage with a liar. Trump and you. The letter EXPLICITLY, from his own cabinet member no less, DOES NOT exonerate him.

Prosecutors do not exonerate people. They either indict or do not. Charge or do not.

 

[andnowweknow]

Yea. So in other words.......

A pussy move

Okay, Mueller's a pussy.

 

[SBJJ]

Okay, Mueller's a pussy.

Nope. But on this one thing it was a pussy move. He was hired to do a job, not punt it

 

[GSP_37]

First thing on TV today is extremely corrupt cocksucker Republicans calling for Schiff to step down as House intel chair. They had absolutely no problem when the biggest jackass of modern TV history Nunes was chair.

 

[SBJJ]

First thing on TV today is extremely corrupt cocksucker Republicans calling for Schiff to step down as House intel chair. They had absolutely no problem when the biggest jackass of modern TV history Nunes was chair.

But Nunes is looking pretty good with the news coming out. Schiff, not so much

 

[waiguoren]

First thing on TV today is extremely corrupt cocksucker Republicans calling for Schiff to step down as House intel chair. They had absolutely no problem when the biggest jackass of modern TV history Nunes was chair.

Is Will Hurd (R- TX 23) an 'extremely corrupt cocksucker Republican'?

 

[vengeful]

Nope. But on this one thing it was a pussy move. He was hired to do a job, not punt it

He did his job, that's what Prosecutors do when there is a difficult decision, they let their boss decide which way to go with it.

 

[GSP_37]

In addition, Jr. is getting people used to the idea he will use the same dirty tricks from the same foreign hostile power to seize the presidency when it's his turn. Better be prepared for a Trump Dong Ill dynasty with Jr. , Ivanka, Baron, Jared, Jr's ex-wife, etc. Some illegit kid from some random expensive ho's gonna claim Trump blood and want in on the dynasty.

 

[GSP_37]

He did his job, that's what Prosecutors do when there is a difficult decision, they let their boss decide which way to go with it.

I agree with Comey that Mueller should have made the call because otherwise what's the point of bringing in a non-politically appointed special counsel if they're just gonna let a cocksucker make the final call?

 

[SBJJ]

He did his job, that's what Prosecutors do when there is a difficult decision, they let their boss decide which way to go with it.

Yes. others also are guilty of pussy moves

 

[Andy Capp]

I would really like to know if you're actually (A)not smart enough to have understood that already or (B)if you're just playing dumb...

You must also believe in Pizzagate.

Inconclusive, IMO,whether you're A or B that is, not Pizzagate. I think you're just trying to get @Jack V Savage to kill more time labeling your logic errors so he has less time to devote to exposing you.

If we find out Barr misrepresented the report he should be removed

I consider deliberate omission intended to mislead to satisfy the condition "misrepresented the report". Do you?

 

[Andy Capp]

Maybe I'm a little behind but this is a fascinating turn IMO:
CBC 6 o'clock news is pointing out that the report appears to show there were even more attempts to contact the Trump campaign by Russia than previously reported and that the Trump campaign were apparently fully aware Russia was working on their behalf despite public claims to the contrary. This would constitute tacit support since they never reported these attempted contacts. So, again, @SBJJ , are errors of omission misrepresentation?


psst... to people with a brain...
I know that if SBJJ responds it's going to be a deflection of some kind because he can't follow logic so "inb4". This is really for people capable of following a train of thought.

 

[SBJJ]

Inconclusive, IMO,whether you're A or B that is, not Pizzagate. I think you're just trying to get @Jack V Savage to kill more time labeling your logic errors so he has less time to devote to exposing you.


I consider deliberate omission intended to mislead to satisfy the condition "misrepresented the report". Do you?

Only difference between Pizzagate and Russiagate is the political sides. I think both are disgraceful while you pick and choose. Also LOL at you reaching for help

Yes, if Barr omitted to slant the report it's the same thing.

Do you find it crazy that what you guys continually accuse the other side of you actually do in reality.

Trump supporters will not accept the presidential election results.....

Trump supporters will not accept the Mueller reports result......

 

[SBJJ]

Maybe I'm a little behind but this is a fascinating turn IMO:
CBC 6 o'clock news is pointing out that the report appears to show there were even more attempts to contact the Trump campaign by Russia than previously reported and that the Trump campaign were apparently fully aware Russia was working on their behalf despite public claims to the contrary. This would constitute tacit support since they never reported these attempted contacts. So, again, @SBJJ , are errors of omission misrepresentation?


psst... to people with a brain...
I know that if SBJJ responds it's going to be a deflection of some kind because he can't follow logic so "inb4". This is really for people capable of following a train of thought.

Lol. I already answered it straightforward
Christ dude

 

[SBJJ]

Link for CBC claim. Does not seem to be on their site

 

[SBJJ]

Imagine if shit like Pizzagate was covered the way Russiagate was by the Media.

You'd have half of America believing it. Some really scary shit how many people eat up propaganda if its pushed hard enough

 

[MikeMcMann]

The guy who is wrong about literally everything is still chiming in for some reason, as if his opinion means something to anyone.

you think he is wrong about that?

You think there is 'doubt' or any question as to whether Schiff steps down over that when he is absolutely in the right and it is Trump and his Campaign who owe the American people an apology?