Summery in March (SCO v 31)

[phoenixikki]

Anyone who is unbiased and has examined the facts knows that the Obama Administration clearly used all means necessary to stop Donald Trump's election.

 

[DIDM]

The FBI are already investigating Michelle’s staff in the Smollett dismissal

 

[hillelslovak87]

Anyone who is unbiased and has examined the facts knows that the Obama Administration clearly used all means necessary to stop Donald Trump's election.

You know what the best part about this post of yours is? The fact that you don't have to back it up with a single shred of information.

 

[GSP_37]

The piece of shit who lied, cheated, stole his way to the presidency and by some freak of nature got away with it has a video clip where he intends to punish those behind the special investigation so those in the future who dare do the same will think twice about the penalty. We are living under a dicktatorship.

 

[HereticBD]

The piece of shit who lied, cheated, stole his way to the presidency and by some freak of nature got away with it has a video clip where he intends to punish those behind the special investigation so those in the future who dare do the same will think twice about the penalty. We are living under a dicktatorship.

Democratically elected.

No collusion.

Cry more.

 

[luckyshot]

 

[Steve-French]

 

[vengeful]

Anyone who is unbiased and has examined the facts knows that the Obama Administration clearly used all means necessary to stop Donald Trump's election.

I think Comey summed it up perfectly last night in regards to what needed to be investigated.

"I don't think that we've seen in the history of our country, the president try to burn down an institution of justice because he saw it as a threat," Comey said. "And the lies he told, forget about me, the lies he told about the agents of the FBI, 'storm troopers,' the lies he told about Bob Mueller, were terrible."

"Close your eyes again, change the names. Let me make one up for you," Comey said. "The Iranians, this is totally made up, the Iranians interfere in the election to help elect Barack Obama because they think they’ll get a better nuclear deal from him. And during that election, an Obama aide meets with the Iranians and talks about the dirt they have that will help Obama get elected. And the FBI finds out about that. We should not investigate that?"

After continuing his reimagined version, Comey says "the hypocrisy is revealed just by changing the names."

"The FBI did what it absolutely had to do," he continued. "The American people should be glad it’s there and proud of it. And the rest is just lying and noise."

 

[Ophydian]

Trump To Declassify Documents Related To FBI, FISA

President Donald Trump told Sean Hannity on Wednesday that he will declassify FBI- and FISA-related documents, now that special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation has concluded.

“I have plans to declassify and release. I have plans to absolutely release,” Trump said, adding that he wanted to declassify documents in 2018 but was told by his lawyers not to do it during the Mueller investigation.

“One of the reasons that my lawyers didn’t want me to do it, they said if I do it, they will call it a form of obstruction, so they will say, oh, you released these documents so we would make all of this information transparent,” Trump said of his lawyers advice, declaring, “But at the right time, we will be absolutely releasing it. I did the right thing by not doing it so far.”


https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/27/trump-declassify-fbi-fisa-documents/

Yes yes how many times has Trump said he was going to release something and the silence

 

[Ophydian]

Anyone who is unbiased and has examined the facts knows that the Obama Administration clearly used all means necessary to stop Donald Trump's election.

Yeah sure buddy.

 

[bobgeese]

The piece of shit who lied, cheated, stole his way to the presidency and by some freak of nature got away with it has a video clip where he intends to punish those behind the special investigation so those in the future who dare do the same will think twice about the penalty. We are living under a dicktatorship.

^^^ Grief stage - Anger

 

[Bobby 3 Sticks]

Judge Nap thinks there's something damning in the Mueller report...

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profil...-and-some-evidence-of-obstruction-of-justice/

“We saw on Sunday, a four-page summary of a 700-page report,” Napolitano noted. “The 700-page report is a summary of 2 million pages of raw evidence. In the 700-page summary of the 2 million pages of raw evidence, there is undoubtedly some evidence of conspiracy and some evidence of obstruction of justice. Just not enough evidence, and thinking the way I think Congressman Schiff is thinking, according to Attorney General Barr, not enough evidence to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, which is the standard.”

Napolitano then said this somewhat tendentious legal standard shouldn’t have informed how Barr packaged his report summary.

“Prosecutors ethically cannot bring a charge unless they believe they can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt,” Napolitano explained. “So, once the 700 pages comes out, and this is my criticism of the attorney general, he shouldn’t have even tipped his hands on this. But once the 700 pages comes out, the Democrats will have–and other Trump opponents will have–a field day with what is in there.”

Why? Napolitano said there was evidence of both alleged crimes in the report:

If there were no evidence of conspiracy and no evidence of obstruction, the attorney general would have told us so. He didn’t. So, there is something in there that the Democrats and opponents of the president want to see. They will see it. And they’ll make hay out of it. And then they’ll second guess Bob Mueller as to whether or not it is enough evidence to meet the legal standard of proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Wonder how much longer Nap will be allowed on Fox

 

[Andy Capp]

I think it's safe to say the Dossier is mostly Bullshit and outright lies.

There will always be die hard drones that argue it. Just like some will argue Pizzagate and other CTs.

Shit, Pizzagate has more going for it than most the dribble in the Dossier. Takes a true partisan to argue the validity of it.

Why do you think it's safe to say that when large parts of it have been corroborated and none of it has been falsified as far as we know?

But what I really want to know from the die hard drones is why is "insufficient evidence for a conviction to be likely" a perfectly OK standard for letting Trump off the hook completely and not for H. Clinton with the email issue or especially Benghazi?

Edit: Credit to @Jack V Savage for having already said this several pages ago and in a much funnier way, but what a surprise, it needed to be said again because it keeps getting drowned out by "NO COLLUSION DERP".

 

[Andy Capp]

Judge Nap thinks there's something damning in the Mueller report...

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profil...-and-some-evidence-of-obstruction-of-justice/



Wonder how much longer Nap will be allowed on Fox

See above. Interesting coincidence.

 

[SBJJ]

Why do you think it's safe to say that when large parts of it have been corroborated and none of it has been falsified as far as we know?

But what I really want to know from the die hard drones is why is "insufficient evidence for a conviction to be likely" a perfectly OK standard for letting Trump off the hook completely and not for H. Clinton with the email issue or especially Benghazi?

If the Dossier was factual. It would have led to a much different Mueller Report. Even some liberal pundits are even coming out now admitting it's mostly bullshit

No one is surprised you are one of the last extremists holding on to the CT

 

[Andy Capp]

If the Dossier was factual. It would have led to a much different Mueller Report. Even some liberal pundits are even coming out now admitting it's mostly bullshit

No one is surprised you are one of the last extremists holding on to the CT

*were LOL

But seriously, it's not a CT because it's not a theory--hell it's not even a hypothesis. I've never even read it. What I have read is documented examples of corroboration and what I have not read is any part of it being falsified in any meaningful way. On a different day, I'd say, specify this "mostly bullshit" and specify this mostly bullshit's relevance to the parts that were already corroborated. But that would be just indulging you in deflecting from the point, wouldn't it? As @Jack V Savage has helpfully pointed out numerous times despite being ignored every time, the "dossier" was nothing more than raw intelligence that perforce would need to be corroborated to serve as "evidence" of anything. Just as I said over and over during the Cohen trial, of course no one is just going to take his word for anything, but once corroborated it is effectively shown to be factual and trustworthy and that is what matters.


I would really like to know if you're actually not smart enough to have understood that already or if you're just playing dumb, but I won't hold my breath waiting for that answer.

 

[DragRacer]

Gosh, I’ll be polite and just say that’s an interesting perspective.

The piece of shit who lied, cheated, stole his way to the presidency and by some freak of nature got away with it has a video clip where he intends to punish those behind the special investigation so those in the future who dare do the same will think twice about the penalty. We are living under a dicktatorship.

 

[bobgeese]

Why do you think it's safe to say that when large parts of it have been corroborated and none of it has been falsified as far as we know?

But what I really want to know from the die hard drones is why is "insufficient evidence for a conviction to be likely" a perfectly OK standard for letting Trump off the hook completely and not for H. Clinton with the email issue or especially Benghazi?

Edit: Credit to @Jack V Savage for having already said this several pages ago and in a much funnier way, but what a surprise, it needed to be said again because it keeps getting drowned out by "NO COLLUSION DERP".

Do you brainlets even follow the news?

Steele literally used anonymous CNN user comments as a “source”.




Let me guess, those pee pee tapes are comin out any day now, right?

 

[BarryDillon]

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

Do you brainlets even follow the news?

Steele literally used anonymous CNN user comments as a “source”.




Let me guess, those pee pee tapes are comin out any day now, right?

Some are still in the denial stage of grief.

So many people wrapped up major parts of their own identity in the Russian collusion hoax.

It'll take days, or possibly even weeks for some people to finally reach acceptance.