Striking numbers for Sandhagen vs Dillashaw

[mudrubble]

Only starting to get good? It got good the moment you entered the conversation. Care to tell us more about how Cory won the fight? I really enjoyed the stats you posted with TJ landing more strikes in the final round.

Yeah it's starting. Especially with the quotes and the laughter. This one above is pretty silly though. I already posted the Weasel vid you ignored. If you don't respond to that I'm gonna have to ignore you which is too bad because you were starting to get funny.

 

[Iron Nick]

I tend to agree with the decision, but I would have had no issue with it going to Sandhagen. Had TJ simply been establishing "control time" by pushing Sandhagen against the cage with no tangible offense (a la Vera/Couture), I'd have been very displeased with the decision. However, TJ had Sandhagen in a rear waist-lock position for long periods of time. I wouldn't quite put this on par with back mount, but it should still count as appreciable offense in my opinion as it equates to progress towards finishing the fight. Damage takes first priority, but the advantage in damage from Sandhagen over TJ wasn't enough to offset the positional success of Dillashaw, in my opinion. This is just my 2 cents and understand if folks disagree -- ultimately, it goes down to what sorts of offense you value, even with the unified rules and criteria set.

Thanks for the input, i guess i agree with your overall take, plus this fight is not that easy to score.

 

[eighterumg5]

Sandbaggin lost. He thought he could do the minimum and get the win and it did not work out for him.

And he turns his back on his opponent way too much

 

[Joshuaace]

Because ppl like that aren't fit to draw air on the same MMA planet as me.

Proceeds to get mauled by a white belt
<45>

 

[JackBlack]

I already posted the Weasel vid you ignored.

I posted numbers I found on the internet. I never said I personally accept these numbers... I should have inspected them before sending them

No, the comedy started many post ago, you were just late to the party, which doesn't surprise me.

You want me to take you seriously when you don't even review the content you post? I asked you to share MORE. More implies I read and watched the other post. Hence the request for MORE.

Care to tell us MORE? Please inspect it before you send it however. <45>

 

[mudrubble]

No, the comedy started many post ago, you were just late to the party, which doesn't surprise me.

You want me to take you seriously when you don't even review the content you post? I asked you to share MORE. More implies I read and watched the other post. Hence the request for MORE.

Care to tell us MORE? Please inspect it before you send it however. <45>

So you did see why I say nobody who understands the rules of MMA judging could reasonably give TJ the 5th round. If you can argue that that's a win, then good for you. For me, it was clear that he lost the 5th.

As I said, striking stats are often as bs as UFC height stats. I always go by what I saw and not by any site's stats. Same thing here.

If you saw TJ win the 5th you don't understand MMA judging criteria. Same as we started, same as we ended. But you did get me to go get random stats that I clearly laughed off and said that by those stats Corey still won.

I hope that's a win for you and I would appreciate one or two more rolling laughing faces for good measure. I also like the dancing one.

 

[mudrubble]

Proceeds to get mauled by a white belt
<45>

Mauled? Because he proved I randomly grabbed stats that I said I randomly grabbed?

I guess, if that's a mauling.

 

[JackBlack]

As I said, striking stats are often as bs as UFC height stats.

I always go by what I saw and not by any stats.

By those stats Corey won.

So you think striking stats are bs, but jumped into a thread about striking numbers to post striking stats and argue about striking stats? <Lmaoo>

Makes perfect sense.

 

[mudrubble]

So you think striking stats are bs, but jumped into a thread about striking numbers to post striking stats and argue about striking stats? <Lmaoo>

Makes perfect sense.

Yes and no. I came in to say the stats are bs and that Corey won the striking and I posted a video.

Thinking you refused to watch it I grabbed random stats to say "even by these stats that give TJ the last round Corey still won".

This is complex for you, eh? It's real simple to me. I get that you're trolling and I'm feeding you but man, you need a new take. Thanks for the laughing emoji though. I appreciate it!

 

[JackBlack]

Thinking you refused to watch it I grabbed random stats I grabbed random stats to say "even by these stats that give TJ the last round Corey still won".

Wrong. You grabbed stats because you claimed mine were "off" So I told you to send the "right ones" in response you sent the SAME stats and ended up looking goofy. Don't try to change the narrative now buddy.



But I am the troll? <45>

 

[NicholasJBasile]

And he turns his back on his opponent way too much

This was probably the difference between him winning and losing, for my money at least.