Stormy Daniels - "affair never happened"

Remember reading or hearing that the National Enquirer owners were on record saying theyd aid Trump in any way to help him get elected.
 
Throttlehead said:
Bullshit, evangelicals have sold out "like never before". This 3 time marrying, 2 corinthian, adulterer (with porn actors), daily-lying con man is making fools of these fools. There is no President in history with such low morals and decency, not even a close second.

Evangelicals would vote for a porn star if he/she was the Republican nominee.
Click to expand...

And let's not forget that our current first lady did soft core lesbian nudes
 
Last edited:
Falsedawn said:
KIMMEL: I know you either do or don't have a non-disclosure agreement. Which if you didn't have a non-disclosure agreement -- do you have a non-disclosure agreement?

DANIELS: Do I?

KIMMEL: You can't say. But if you didn't, you certainly could say I don't have a non-disclosure agreement.

DANIELS: You're so smart Jimmy.

<puh-lease75>
Click to expand...


What the fuck does that mean? Decode that for me. Jimmy is too smart, here.
 
Overtures said:
What the fuck does that mean? Decode that for me. Jimmy is too smart, here.
Click to expand...

You can't confirm, but that doesn't mean you have to deny.

She was saying that he was correct with the questions he was asking.
 
Unless of course the polygraph was faulty...At least it makes for great conversation at the bar over a drink! :)
Washington (CNN)Stormy Daniels was "truthful about having unprotected vaginal intercourse with Donald Trump in July 2006," according to a polygraph test report from 2011.

The report states that the "probability of deception was measured to be less than 1%." It was given to CNN by Michael Avenatti, Daniels' attorney and contains three pertinent questions: "Around July 2006, did you have vaginal intercourse with Donald Trump?," "Around July 2006, did you have unprotected sex with Donald Trump?" and "Did Trump say you would get on 'The Apprentice?'"

Another Trump attorney involved in Stormy Daniels case
Daniels replied yes to all three questions. The first two were analyzed to be truthful, the third question was "inconclusive" according to the polygraph examiner Ronald Slay.
Polygraphs are generally inadmissible in court.
The polygraph was performed at the request of Bauer Publishing, which owns Life&Style and InTouch magazines, according to the reporter who interviewed Daniels in 2011. Reporter Jordi Lippe-McGraw initially interviewed Daniels for Life & Style magazine. The interview was not published at the time, but Bauer Publishing released it in InTouch magazine earlier this year.

Woman named in Stormy Daniels' document accused Trump of unwanted advances
Lippe-McGraw previously told CNN that Daniels passed the test in a broader sense. "Based off of the interview, we had her take the polygraph test to confirm the details of what she was telling us. There wasn't much in the way of physical evidence, per se," Lippe-McGraw said, adding that the big-picture question they wanted to confirm was that the affair happened, and that Daniels passed. Lippe-McGraw said that Daniels told her she had unprotected sex with Trump, because Daniels is allergic to latex and didn't have condoms at the time.
Earlier Tuesday. Avenatti tweeted out a photograph of Daniels being administered the test.
The Wall Street Journal first released the details of the polygraph questions and answers.
 
Strychnine said:
Click to expand...

And you know all of those Christian guys had seen their share of Stormy Daniels' porn back in the day.
 
CNN just did a interview with another porn star saying Stormy and Trump tried to convince her into having a threesome.
 
Trump has a really shitty taste in women. You would think a person with that kind of money could do better. lmao
 
KaNesDeath said:
Remember reading or hearing that the National Enquirer owners were on record saying theyd aid Trump in any way to help him get elected.
Click to expand...

Because Trump and the CEO, David Pecker of the Enquirer are best pals.

You could also make the claim that The National Enquirer has compromising information about the POTUS and has yet to publish it.
 
Revolver said:
Trump has a really shitty taste in women. You would think a person with that kind of money could do better. lmao
Click to expand...
could be worse. Could be a fat intern in the Oval Office. Instead it’s pornstars and playboy bunnies. Far below your normal level of women we know
 
ShoelessRye said:
Also another woman is suing to be able to tell her story - https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/20/...eakingNews&contentID=66703135&pgtype=Homepage

A former Playboy model who claimed she had an affair with Donald J. Trump sued on Tuesday to be released from a 2016 legal agreement requiring her silence, becoming the second woman this month to challenge Trump allies’ efforts during the presidential campaign to bury stories about extramarital relationships.

The model, Karen McDougal, is suing the company that owns The National Enquirer, American Media Inc., which paid her $150,000 and whose chief executive is a friend of Mr. Trump’s. The other woman, the adult entertainment star Stephanie Clifford, better known as Stormy Daniels, was paid $130,000 to stay quiet by the president’s personal lawyer, Michael D. Cohen. She filed suit earlier this month.

...

Ms. McDougal negotiated with the country’s leading tabloid news provider, A.M.I., which is known to buy and bury stories that might damage friends and allies of its chief executive, David J. Pecker, a practice known as “catch and kill.”

Ms. McDougal’s legal complaint alleges that she did not know about the practice, or about Mr. Pecker’s friendship with Mr. Trump, when she began talking to company representatives in spring 2016, shortly after Mr. Trump locked up the Republican nomination.

A.M.I. has previously acknowledged that Mr. Trump had been friends with Mr. Pecker, but said that he had never tried to influence coverage at A.M.I.’s publications.

Ms. McDougal has said she was ambivalent about selling her story on the tabloid news market, but felt that her hand was forced after a hint of the alleged affair appeared in May 2016 on social media. Convinced something more would come out, she was determined to tell her story on her terms, her suit says.

A mutual friend connected her to Mr. Davidson, who, she said, told her the story could be worth millions. He arranged an interview with Dylan Howard, A.M.I.’s chief content officer, in Los Angeles. Mr. Davidson told her before the interview that A.M.I. would put $500,000 into an escrow account for her, and that “a seven-figure publishing contract awaited her,” the complaint reads.

Mr. Howard spent several hours pressing Ms. McDougal on the details of her story. But several days later, the media company declined to buy it, the complaint reads, and “Mr. Davidson revealed that, in fact, there was no money in escrow.”

A.M.I. told The Times last month that it decided not to print Ms. McDougal’s story because it could not verify important details, but it acknowledged that it discussed her allegations with Mr. Cohen, the president’s lawyer, saying it did so as part of its reporting process.

The tabloid company showed renewed interest in summer 2016 when Ms. McDougal began talks with ABC News. This time, A.M.I. offered a different deal.

Mr. Davidson informed her that A.M.I. would buy her story but “not publish it” because of Mr. Pecker’s relationship with Mr. Trump,” the suit says. The payment would be $150,000, with Mr. Davidson and others involved on her behalf taking 45 percent. More alluring to Ms. McDougal, who is now a fitness specialist, was that the media company would feature her on its covers and in regular health and fitness columns, the complaint says.

As A.M.I. and Mr. Davidson pushed her to sign the deal on Aug. 5, Ms. McDougal expressed misgivings. But, her suit says, Mr. Davidson and Mr. Howard argued in an urgent Skype call that the deal to promote her would “kick start and revitalize” her career, given that she was “old now.” She was 45.

In all, they said, the contract would obligate A.M.I. to run more than 100 columns or articles and at least two covers featuring her. When she asked Mr. Davidson what she should do if her story leaked, Mr. Davidson responded in an email, “IF YOU DENY YOU ARE SAFE,” and urged her to sign as soon as possible, according to the court documents.

The Times reported last month that Mr. Davidson sent Mr. Cohen an email on Aug. 5, 2016, asking him to call. Mr. Davidson then told Mr. Cohen over the phone that the deal had been completed, according to a person familiar with the conversation.

The timeline provided in the lawsuit shows that Mr. Davidson’s email came as he and A.M.I. were still hashing out the terms of the deal, which Ms. McDougal did not sign until the following day, Aug. 6. Mr. Cohen told The Times last month that he did not recall the communications.
​
Seems like Trump's personal lawyer and fixer was very involved in this hush money case as well. Did Cohen reimburse Mr. Pecker's expense? If not, why did Mr. Pecker pay $150K to kill the story? Why pass on it earlier in the year, and then in August 2016 decide he better buy it afterall - because Trump was GOP nominee by then? He'll need to explain that on the witness stand and if it was to protect Trump than it can be deemed an illegal campaign donation. And given Cohen knew all about it - Trump cannot pretend he wasn't aware.
Click to expand...

beat ya by a minute :P
 
Cake4Breakfast said:
And you know all of those Christian guys had seen their share of Stormy Daniels' porn back in the day.
Click to expand...
The religious folk are the worst hypocrites ever! We have a Jehovoh's Witness in the office.. 3 times so far he's been caught fapping to porn... I told him... If you're gonna do that shit, close your damned office door.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,225
Messages
57,976,032
Members
175,889
Latest member
MEthzale

Share this page

Back
Top