- Joined
- Apr 9, 2013
- Messages
- 4,972
- Reaction score
- 2,386
hmm, too bad the record books can be changed. That's why I prefer using the actual primary sources.odd.. I don’t see that in the record books
hmm, too bad the record books can be changed. That's why I prefer using the actual primary sources.odd.. I don’t see that in the record books
oh really, then tell me why jon jones gave up the chance to fight for the hw title against a guy he ko'd and beat convincingly twice? are you that casual of an mma fan or what? jon even said himself DC has way more power at HWI fail to see how a fatter DC would do any better against Jones.
He still has the exact same weaknesses.
Steroids do not erase gigantic gaps of skill. Much less at trace amount levels..
Because he's a horrible person outside of the octagon (evidenced by fleeing a hit and run with drugs + cash and, in my opinion, drunk -- leaving a pregnant woman with a broken arm).The jones hate is honestly really funny. Every piece of it. Who would have thought a guy like that would be the GOAT MMA fighter? Coke, dick pills, hit and runs. All while thanking god. It’s probably the greatest gift people who have a sense of humor could ever ask for.
Factually "No contest" implies there was no contest that took place.
If nothing else can we agree that it's a fact we witnessed a contest that night and one man was acknowledged as the winners of said contest for the next 7 days
Jones moving up and fighting anyone at heavyweight, including DC, is totally unknown
Uhh yeah they can make pretty large gaps.... and Jones didnt do trace amounts
thats wrong, have a good dayNo, not including DC. They fought twice and DC fights just the same at HW.
oh really, then tell me why jon jones gave up the chance to fight for the hw title against a guy he ko'd and beat convincingly twice? are you that casual of an mma fan or what? jon even said himself DC has way more power at HW
No, not including DC. They fought twice and DC fights just the same at HW.
No.
If that was the case DC would have lost to any roider he fought (Bigfoot, Barnett, Hendo, Mir, Anderson). Instead he beat them all with ease. Yet he could hardly do anything to Jones.
Roids give you an edge. Like I said, they don't erase gigantic gaps of skill.
hmm, too bad the record books can be changed. That's why I prefer using the actual primary sources.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In a slander campaign orchestrated by dc, who had a teammate spike jone's food.Indeed, they were changed. Why were they changed again?
In a slander campaign orchestrated by dc, who had a teammate spike jone's food.
Exactly, well put dude.And it's for that reason that no contests are dumb, and need to be radically scaled back to be being an extremely rarely invoked ruling for circumstances where we should actually be able to say no fight occurred.
Like yeah, if you accidentally get eyepoked 10 seconds in then call the fight as having not occurred. Nothing had happened, and there was nothing determining who was winning. If you get eyepoked and cannot continue after the majority of the rounds had happened then call for a technical decision and go to the scorecards and determine who won based on where the fight stood as it was when the blow happened (a la Cerrone/Varner).
Stop saying fights didn't happen when they did. We have a lot of subjective opinions in MMA because of these dumb rulings rather than the reality of the fight we saw.
There's a big difference between saying "steroids make a big difference" and "steroids automatically makes you win."
Theres plenty of cases of fighters having huge dropoffs after not being able to use TRT or steroids anymore.