Social Steven crowder demonetized

[Rational Poster]

If crowders unbelievable FACTS and LOGIC are so good why can't he make his points without race and sexuality based comments? Because Crowder is a fucking hack, his arguments are terrible, so he has to rely on edge racial humor to be entertaining and have an audience. It's sad how hyper partisan people like you are and you can't just see something for what it is because of your partisan blinders.

I was just thinking to myself the only reason this is bad is because of all the exposure Crowder is getting from it

 

[lifelessheap]

More deserving of demonetization about this than Alex Jones. He was peddling a conservative economic narrative. And yes I do preaching trickle down economics needs to be suppressed you know cause it's false and that lie has a profound negative effect on society. First victim of demonetization where I'm enthusiastically supportive, man was just a misinformation factory. Somehow knowing them doubt this is why he was censored but I've come to a point where I don't expect people to do the right thing for the right reasons.

Move to Venezuela. The American dream is more alive there for people like you.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

CNN can hire whoever they want. They can fire whoever they want.

News to me. I thought there were lots of protected classes of people that not hiring or firing (for the "wrong" reason) could wind them up in court. Plus they've got to pay a certain minimum amount all around, and have to make sure there's no significant pay discrepancy between genders.

Anyone who supports these laws, then defends censorship based solely on the censor being a private entity, should probably take stock of the consistency of their positions.

 

[Rational Poster]

Crop insurance is considered a subsidy, but its not really.
If you don't grow that crop, you get no subsidy. You don't have to grow anything, but if you are to receive a subsidy, you must grow one of seven, or so, crops. And why would the gubment subsidize a crop? Because they force the farmer to sell at less than the value of the farming. So we pay the difference any how.

Anyhow, its a derail. Point is, if you receive favor from the government (the people) then you follow the Governments (peoples) rules. Which in the case of speech and expression, is the first amendment.

Crop insurance paid for the by the US government is absolutely a subsidy. There is a wide range of government assistance available to farmers to the the tune of tens of billions every year and increasing.

No one tells the farmers what they can say, think, or do. Who they can have on their property or who they can sell their product to.

The direct crop subsidies are contingent on you actually growing the crop first, not the other way around. And I will certainly admit there are totally scum bag "farmers" who will specifically "grow" the bare minimum of certain crops just to get those benefits, but that's far less common than the legitimate growers.

It's also not just seven, it's closer to a dozen or so of the most popular crops and multiple varieties of each.

 

[Reactionary Corporatist]

I was just thinking to myself the only reason this is bad is because of all the exposure Crowder is getting from it

I can't believe these morons can actually watch the video this Maza guy posted and go "what? Crowder didn't do anything wrong! This is bullshit!" What universe are these people living in? Repeatedly making comments like that about another human being is pretty repugnant.

 

[jefferz]

The right has principles and isn't obsessed with censorship.

 

[Sketch]

If crowders unbelievable FACTS and LOGIC are so good why can't he make his points without race and sexuality based comments? Because Crowder is a fucking hack, his arguments are terrible, so he has to rely on edge racial humor to be entertaining and have an audience. It's sad how hyper partisan people like you are and you can't just see something for what it is because of your partisan blinders.

Can you not post with Caps lock on? It's extremely obnoxious.

The hack here is you, as usual. Calling people partisan while you dance around here spouting your agenda is comical, at best.

 

[nac386]

News to me. I thought there were lots of protected classes of people that not hiring or firing (for the "wrong" reason) could wind them up in court. Plus they've got to pay a certain minimum amount all around, and have to make sure there's no significant pay discrepancy between genders.

I was talking about actions, not identity. Like how Fox news hired Mark Furman even though he’s on tape talking about abusing n-words as a cop, and using gay slurs. A crooked cop who admits to mistreating black people on the job, hired as a law enforcement contributor. Lol.

Anyone who supports these laws, then defends censorship based solely on the censor being a private entity, should probably take stock of the consistency of their positions.

They are not remotely related. YouTube is not employing Crowder, he does not work for them. They are not hiring or firing him.

But also, as an employee you are not allowed to just say anything you want without fear of consequence from your employer. People are fired all the time for saying the wrong thing at work or on social media.

 

[GearSolidMetal]

I can't believe these morons can actually watch the video this Maza guy posted and go "what? Crowder didn't do anything wrong! This is bullshit!" What universe are these people living in? Repeatedly making comments like that about another human being is pretty repugnant.

I can't believe these morons can actually watch the video this Crowder guy posted and go "what? Maza didn't do anything wrong! This is bullshit!" What universe are these people living in? Repeatedly making false claims about news organizations is pretty repugnant.

 

[Reactionary Corporatist]

I can't believe these morons can actually watch the video this Crowder guy posted and go "what? Maza didn't do anything wrong! This is bullshit!" What universe are these people living in? Repeatedly making false claims about news organizations is pretty repugnant.

Maza didn't make any racial or sexuality based comments about Crowder. What are you not understanding here? Maza is allowed to say whatever he wants to about himself that doesn't make it okay for anyone else to say those things about him.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

They are not remotely related.

The same basic concept is at play (i.e. government intervention for social reasons). Do you consistently fall on one side or the other, or do you pick and choose depending on who gets fucked over?

 

[TheFirstEMP]

 

[GearSolidMetal]

Maza didn't make any racial or sexuality based comments about Crowder. What are you not understanding here? Maza is allowed to say whatever he wants to about himself that doesn't make it okay for anyone else to say those things about him.

Should Colbert have been allowed to say Trump's mouth is Putin's cockholster?

Yes, he should be allowed, because this is a free country with free speech.

No one said he should have been fired, or thrown off all social media and streaming sites. He faced criticism, as he should have.

Maza isn't offended by Crowder's mockery of him, he's using fake outrage to lobby YouTube to ban him because Crowder frequently response to his videos and destroys his arguments.

Rather than respond to Crowder, Gaza wants to silence opposition to his message - like a typical Marxist,, which Gaza has openly admitted to be while claiming to be a journalist.

Have you seen the video from last week, or just Gaza's montage of short clips of Crowder mocking him?

 

[nac386]

The same basic concept is at play (i.e. government intervention for social reasons). Do you consistently fall on one side or the other, or do you pick and choose depending on who gets fucked over?

You are equating the regulation of identity with behavior. One thing that you control, and the other you do not. You are also comparing civil rights and labor law to the privilege of posting your videos on YouTube.

Should you be allowed to post porn on YouTube? Or should YouTube be allowed to deny you that privilege?

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

You are equating the regulation of identity with behavior. One thing that you control, and the other you do not. You are also comparing civil rights and labor law to the privilege of posting your videos on YouTube.

Should you be allowed to post porn on YouTube? Or should YouTube be allowed to deny you that privilege?

Since you can't grasp the basics, I'll just move on.

 

[Lord Garth]

Someone needs to shoop YouTube logo over this old union guy's head as he feeds this Crowder beta his lunch.

So Crowder would mop this fat old goon. Dork or no, he is 6'2" and has trained MMA for more than a decade. He was more coolheaded and judicious than I would have been . He extended the challenge to "spar" with tubby, who tucked

 

[Wulfanon]

@nac386 "Should you be allowed to post porn on YouTube? Or should YouTube be allowed to deny you that privilege?"

Just target it at minors Elsagate style and you'll get the green light.

 

[floivanus]

This isn't even about Steven Crowder, it's about the coporate media using their money and influence to shut down competition, take back control of the market and tighten their strangle hold on their monoply and the information people have access to. So youtube, along with every other social media platform, are now in full censorship mode. Ordinary people are more and more rejecting the bullshit fed to them by the mainstream establishment, they can see right throught it, which has led to the rise in popularity of individual content creators. This was not never going to be tolerated for much longer, especially in light of how the working classes have been voting recently, as this whole movement has now spread to politics.

So the plan is to ensure that social media ends up being no different to the news channels, Hollywood, late night talks shows etc, that some people still consume. Where it's the same few people, parroting the same few views and narratives, in the hope that with no dissent or opposing opinions allowed, it will eventually sink in and people will stop thinking for themselves.

Youtube is censorious as all get out now as well; the analysis of the Trending tab points that out, very few views are needed for traditional media to make trending, however other content needs much more views to even crack it.

Where youtube doesn’t have active live moderation other edgy or non advertiser friendly content tends to trend more often



They don’t want crowder, they don’t want pewdiepie they don’t want Joe rogan. There’s no money in it for them, people need to wake up to that fact

 

[nac386]

Since you can't grasp the basics, I'll just move on.

Lol. Good job, champ.

 

[Lord Garth]

You guys sure do love to blame the left anytime a conservative fails at business.

Crowder didn't "fail at business" any more than a shop owner who had his store burned down by an arsonist "failed at business"