STAR WARS: THE LAST JEDI

If you have seen STAR WARS: THE LAST JEDI, how would you rate it?

  • Total voters
    587
Obviously the film makers will try to save face and lie about Palps being part of the story since day one but yeah fuckin right
 
LOL NO ONE CAN BE TRUSTED.

giphy.gif


YOU CAN PROVE ANYTHING WITH "FACTS."
 
BisexualMMA said:
I could probably throw Kathleen Kennedy about 25 feet or so. No way in hell I'm trusting her that far.
Click to expand...
Dec. 2015 (end of page 1)
"at that point we were sitting down and talking about where this might go, even as early on as with Michael Arndt. We were sort of plotting out, because obviously if you know up front that you’re building the pacing inside a trilogy structure, we needed to have some sense of where this saga was going without locking in on things and leaving room for creative development. But we had to have some sense of where we were going." KK
Clippy said:
Obviously the film makers will try to save face and lie about Palps being part of the story since day one but yeah fuckin right
Click to expand...

What's obvious is that they had a plan. & Lucas even heard their plan in early 2012.

what's obvious is that they didn't turn their 4 billion dollar asset over to a rogue writer in the main trilogy while micromanaging a side project in solo with 9 figure reshoots & a director change. Is your point that they were just scared or Rian? :eek:<Eek2.0>:eek:

RIAN-JOHNSON.jpg


Imma do WTF I want & there'z nothing you can do about it... KAAAAATHYYYY.
 
Anyone see any kids on Halloween dressing up as any character from the new trilogy? I find that kind of telling as to the lack of connection the characters have to regular peeps.
 
BisexualMMA said:
Wow, that's a bold statement. Absolutely exudes confidence and an unwavering direction.
Click to expand...
She's clearly saying they had a plan. Obviously it doesn't reveal what that plan was, but I thought there was no plan. I thought Rian just did whatever the he wanted. How could she be saying that?

How is it that Disney president told Lucas in early 2012 what they storyline ideas were?
 
Last edited:
Myrddin Wild said:
She's clearly saying they had a plan. Obviously it doesn't reveal what that plan was, but I thought there was no plan. I thought Rian just did whatever the fuck he wanted. How could she be saying that?

How is it that Disney president told Lucas in early 2012 what they storyline ideas were?
Click to expand...

They probably told George about TFA

Here is what the rest of the scripts looked like

TLJ - wait for audience reaction from TFA to proceed

Oh the audience was not impressed with samey same of TFA - let's go radical different direction and hire the biggest subversion fetishist we know

Rain Johnson writes the TLJ lol

The supreme tone shift of Rey meeting luke to him tossing his saber is a major indicator

TROS ???

Why are they testing hordes of alternate endings with TROS if they know what they are doing??????

They aren't writing good content here - they are doing reactive pandering - and are fucking that up too
 
Clippy said:
Why are they testing hordes of alternate endings with TROS if they know what they are doing??????

They aren't writing good content here - they are doing reactive pandering - and are fucking that up too
Click to expand...
You have asked the question and you are the answer. You can't deliver what people want when the people complain about everything and nothing's good enough.
 
A.A. Riggs said:
You have asked the question and you are the answer. You can't deliver what people want when the people complain about everything and nothing's good enough.
Click to expand...

lol you're worse than the film makers blaming everyone but themselves for making shit content

I guess it's my fault Charlie's Angels failed too huh
 
Arguing from your side, I would say CHARLIE'S ANGELS failed because they forgot an important factor when concentrating on "representation": and that is: Whom Buys The Tickets. When you consider the audience of CHARLIE'S ANGELS as being men wanting to see eye candy, NON-EYECANDY ANGELS is trying to capture an audience that does not realize nor care that it exists.

It's not exactly the same with STAR WARS, even though the antipathy is clearly the same: You're angry because STAR WARS is no longer for you. But that's because it's for kids. Go ahead and argue how kids don't like it but isn't that mostly comparing their perceived reactions, mixed with your own, against your own childhood reactions and its attendant nostalgia throughout the years? Am I way off base?
 
A.A. Riggs said:
Arguing from your side, I would say CHARLIE'S ANGELS failed because they forgot an important factor when concentrating on "representation": and that is: Whom Buys The Tickets. When you consider the audience of CHARLIE'S ANGELS as being men wanting to see eye candy, this iteration is trying to capture an audience that does not realize nor care that it exists.

It's not exactly the same with STAR WARS, even though the antipathy is clearly the same: You're angry because STAR WARS is no longer for you. But that's because it's for kids. Go ahead and argue how kids don't like it but isn't that mostly comparing their perceived reactions, mixed with your own, against your own childhood reactions and its attendant nostalgia throughout the years? Am I way off base?
Click to expand...

cat-scratching-sofa.gif
 
New STAR WARS film:


Old STAR WARS fan:
giphy.gif


Clippy:
giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
A.A. Riggs said:
Arguing from your side, I would say CHARLIE'S ANGELS failed because they forgot an important factor when concentrating on "representation": and that is: Whom Buys The Tickets. When you consider the audience of CHARLIE'S ANGELS as being men wanting to see eye candy, NON-EYECANDY ANGELS is trying to capture an audience that does not realize nor care that it exists.

It's not exactly the same with STAR WARS, even though the antipathy is clearly the same: You're angry because STAR WARS is no longer for you. But that's because it's for kids. Go ahead and argue how kids don't like it but isn't that mostly comparing their perceived reactions, mixed with your own, against your own childhood reactions and its attendant nostalgia throughout the years? Am I way off base?
Click to expand...
you're automatically out for straying off the base line
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,182
Messages
58,264,431
Members
175,986
Latest member
Dakota DeSousa

Share this page

Back
Top