- Joined
- May 15, 2021
- Messages
- 9,518
- Reaction score
- 17,190
That’s not a legitimate threshold based on you can’t say you were in grave bodily harm if you can’t identify the target. Manslaughter charges def seem applicable.
The lady wasnt just standing outside. She was actively trying to get inside the home.
How is the mistake on the "intruders"? The person shot them through a closed and locked door. Your assumption the person maybe have gone inside is wrong if you read even a little bit.
there are other articles on the subject. She was shot through the door while on the porch. she had not gone inside or even opened the door. she had keys (wrong keys) in hand but not had time to try them.It's not really clear in that article is she was shot on the porch or if she somehow managed to gain entry into the house when she was shot. Yes, there are people who would shoot just based on race, some people even wait for someone suspicious ringing their bell to break in to shoot them, but if she actually entered the home there might not be any charges possible in this case.
We don't know what the guy was thinking but if there was a 911 call before the shooting he must have been worried they were breaking in.
If he shot her on the porch then I think he should be charged for killing her. Like the old guy that shot a boy through his window, the lady that shot a mother through a door, and the guy that shot a girl through her windshield because she drove onto his driveway were charged. I do remember a guy in Texas getting away with killing his girlfriend's ex-husband on his porch, since the curtilage is considered part of the home, but in that case there was a struggle for his weapon.
By that do you mean she was trying to use the keys to the house she should have visited? That's a big difference than someone trying to actually break the door down.The lady wasnt just standing outside. She was actively trying to get inside the home.
Every professional military and law enforcement agency in the world teaches it's recruits the same thing:
Never point a weapon at someone you are not prepared to shoot.
Never shoot anyone you are not prepared to kill.
"Warning shots" are for amateurs and Hollywood.![]()
If you don't realize you're at the wrong house isn't it logical for her to try to use the keys to open the door?She had keys in her hand trying to get into wrong the house? The article made it sound like she was using keys to get into a house, but if you have keys to a house that you're supposed to clean, it would seem to me you don't mistake the house you're trying to get into. It's very unclearly written and missing details that would help with context.
That or this cleaning lady was supposed to go to an AirBNB/VRBO short term rental where they're cleaning between visitors
It seems she was given the keys to let herself in based on what I read.Why was she trying go get inside a house shes never been to before instead of ringing the doorbell or calling the owner?
When I read it I thought it was a bit ambiguous. That they reported the police found her on the porch led me to believe he shot through the door but more details would be nice.How is the mistake on the "intruders"? The person shot them through a closed and locked door. Your assumption the person maybe have gone inside is wrong if you read even a little bit.
Yeah but it only matters if it was this lady's first time there even if her company already had the keys.Yes except this isn't cabin or hotel, this was a home so im just trying to understand how they had keys to a home or why they were at the wrong place with keys to another place. Seems like the cleaning service already had keys to another home so just surprised that they were at the wrong place if they already had keys to a home. If they had keys then im assuming for now that this service has been to the correct address before.
Tried to search and see if this was posted, couldn't find it, soooo...
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...g-wrong-house-said-tore-everything-rcna242624
![]()
If it was a Sydney Sweeny looking white woman that was randomly killed, the feds and Trump himself would be there.
Literally anyone you don't like, any random person coming up to your door your your car window, just blast him, scared for your life.
Can you back that up with sources?
This is from the Swedish police website
"If possible, less serious forms of violence should be used and if firearms need to be used, the person who may be exposed to the violence should be warned if possible. This can be done by firing a warning shot or by shouting, for example.
Although the use of firearms can cause serious injuries or death, the aim is to cause as little damage as possible, including by aiming shots at the legs where possible."
Warnings shots are used both by police and military.
You can google that shit.
About a decade or so ago there was a case of a swedish cop who accidentally killed his attacker with the ricochet from his warning-shot.Can you back that up with sources?
This is from the Swedish police website
"If possible, less serious forms of violence should be used and if firearms need to be used, the person who may be exposed to the violence should be warned if possible. This can be done by firing a warning shot or by shouting, for example.
Although the use of firearms can cause serious injuries or death, the aim is to cause as little damage as possible, including by aiming shots at the legs where possible."
Warnings shots are used both by police and military.
You can google that shit.
Because the idea of a warning shot is as dumb as shooting perps in the legs.I just meant some type of warning. Yeah, a shot is probably not a good idea but trying to communicate before executing them. And no I do not believe cops should aim at legs, not sure your point on that
Tried to search and see if this was posted, couldn't find it, soooo...
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...g-wrong-house-said-tore-everything-rcna242624
![]()
A cleaning woman, who accidentally went to the wrong house, was shot dead by the home owner. The murderer didn't say anything, didn't try to announce his presence or try to stop her or ask what was going on, just pulled a Frank Reynolds and started blasting.
Not only is the murder not in prison, they aren't even arrested, and their name hasn't even been released. It's hard to not feel like because this woman spoke broken English and is Hispanic that no one cares, especially with all the ICE bullshit going on lately. If it was a Sydney Sweeny looking white woman that was randomly killed, the feds and Trump himself would be there.
The cops have said the murderer isn't a cop or former cop or anyone worth protecting their identity over, but it's bizarre as fuck that this dude just killed someone, and nothing is happening.
There's been mostly sane opinions, but still a lot of 2A people that act like this guy did nothing wrong and was justified in murdering someone for going to the wrong house. Imagine being so mentally fucked, and such a scared little bitch, that you see a woman with cleaning supplies and her husband and your first thought is, "OMG IT'S A SETUP THEY'RE GOING TO KILL ME I NEED TO KILL THEM FIRST." Insane mental delusions, or just convenient excuses.
These are people who should never own guns and why there's a gun problem in the first place. These people are either mentally ill, insanely paranoid, or hateful racists, all owning guns and looking for any reason to kill someone and then try claiming self defense and that they were scared for their livelihood. Going by their logic, you can murder anyone you deem a "threat", and that's as broad of strokes as you can use. Literally anyone you don't like, any random person coming up to your door your your car window, just blast him, scared for your life.