- Joined
- Mar 10, 2013
- Messages
- 177
- Reaction score
- 0
Obviously the barbell squat is a high end great-bang-for-the-buck exercise. But, I think the general perception is that if you don't squat...your training is not optimal, or it's incomplete.
But is this really the case...? I'm familiar with some programs (some of Pavel's stuff) that don't even include squats...and Pavel himself doesn't seem to hold the attitude that squats are mandatory...especially for more mobile tactical/type athletes. Ross Enamait's stuff doesn't include barbell squats either.
I just finished up a 9 week strength phase (Tactical Barbell: gladiator template) and didn't include barbell squats in my cluster. I went with a Pistol squats/ weighted pull-ups/bench cluster. Now I realize pistols are a form of squat, and I increased my pistols from 5 strict/leg to 18 in 9 weeks. But I didn't barbell squat once.
I've noticed no change in leg size or power....if anything my legs look more muscular and feel far sturdier, but of course that could probably just be a result of completing the 9week template with the pistols. I might've had that much better results with barbell squats who knows. I can't say it's affected my roadwork, one way or another vs barbell squats. If anything roadwork and conditioning sessions seem easier. One major positive....I do seem to have more energy overall during lifting sessions and weekly training. I guess pistols just aren't as draining as barbell squats.
One reason I ask is because I'm heading back to my boxing gym this week after a long time away. I'll be switching back to only lifting twice a week (TB:Fighter template - had excellent results with this last time). So I'm picking a new exercise cluster for the next 12 week strength phase....and wondering if I should include squats or not. I'll be spending a considerable amount of time doing cardio/conditioning/boxing drills, so any extra training energy during the week would be a major plus...as long as it's worth the trade-off of not squatting.
Anyone here NOT squat regularly? How has it really affected your overall fitness level and strength? Did your legs wither away? Any pros/cons? I'm particularly interested to hear from anyone that boxes or does MMA. Obviously this isn't a permanent thing, whether I decide to include squats or not, I can always change exercise clusters at the end of the strength phase and go back to squatting. I thought this would be an interesting discussion/food for thought...as it seems to be accepted that you MUST barbell squat or your training is 'wrong'.
But is this really the case...? I'm familiar with some programs (some of Pavel's stuff) that don't even include squats...and Pavel himself doesn't seem to hold the attitude that squats are mandatory...especially for more mobile tactical/type athletes. Ross Enamait's stuff doesn't include barbell squats either.
I just finished up a 9 week strength phase (Tactical Barbell: gladiator template) and didn't include barbell squats in my cluster. I went with a Pistol squats/ weighted pull-ups/bench cluster. Now I realize pistols are a form of squat, and I increased my pistols from 5 strict/leg to 18 in 9 weeks. But I didn't barbell squat once.
I've noticed no change in leg size or power....if anything my legs look more muscular and feel far sturdier, but of course that could probably just be a result of completing the 9week template with the pistols. I might've had that much better results with barbell squats who knows. I can't say it's affected my roadwork, one way or another vs barbell squats. If anything roadwork and conditioning sessions seem easier. One major positive....I do seem to have more energy overall during lifting sessions and weekly training. I guess pistols just aren't as draining as barbell squats.
One reason I ask is because I'm heading back to my boxing gym this week after a long time away. I'll be switching back to only lifting twice a week (TB:Fighter template - had excellent results with this last time). So I'm picking a new exercise cluster for the next 12 week strength phase....and wondering if I should include squats or not. I'll be spending a considerable amount of time doing cardio/conditioning/boxing drills, so any extra training energy during the week would be a major plus...as long as it's worth the trade-off of not squatting.
Anyone here NOT squat regularly? How has it really affected your overall fitness level and strength? Did your legs wither away? Any pros/cons? I'm particularly interested to hear from anyone that boxes or does MMA. Obviously this isn't a permanent thing, whether I decide to include squats or not, I can always change exercise clusters at the end of the strength phase and go back to squatting. I thought this would be an interesting discussion/food for thought...as it seems to be accepted that you MUST barbell squat or your training is 'wrong'.