Social Spying on Trump confirmed: Operation Crossfire Hurricane ***UPDATE: Comey Admits, "I Was Wrong" ***

[7437]

“the Special Counsel did not find that any U.S. person or Trump campaign official or associate conspired or knowingly coordinated with the IRA in its efforts”


Rod Rosenstein says it’s ‘completely bizarre’ to say William Barr is ‘trying to mislead people’ on Mueller report

....

There you go 7, Rosenstien (who you probably sucked the cock of for a year straight) says your stance is bizarre.

Congratulations on your tin foil hat.

..... the IRA? I might have missed an acronym somewhere but I thought he was being investigated about russia

 

[bobgeese]

..... the IRA? I might have missed an acronym somewhere but I thought he was being investigated about russia

(Russian) Internet Research Agency

And again, according to Rosenstien, your position is bizarre.

Are you ready to admit you were wrong yet?

 

[Witchhunt]

This thread has turned to comedy gold!

 

[MikeMcMann]

Apples and oranges. You haven’t seen any evidence of anything. All we have is that he’s been totally exonerated of collusion and a major lack of evidence of obstruction. This is no “well he’s guilty but he got off on a technicality....”

So, by all means, contact your Democrat overlords and voice your support for impeachment due to the “evidence of something-I-don’t-know-what....”

ha troll.

Only Trumpsters care about Barr's report.


We haven't seen any evidence to discuss... really?...

--------

Newly released testimony: Former top FBI lawyer says agency concerned Trump obstructed justice

James Baker, the former top lawyer of the FBI, told lawmakers last fall that there were widespread concerns inside the FBI that President Donald Trump had attempted to obstruct the bureau's investigation into his campaign's links to Russians, according to a newly released transcript of Baker's testimony...

-------

We haven't seen any evidence to discuss... really?...


-------------


- It is FACT that we had a foreign adversarial gov't infiltrating and impacting an election...

- It is FACT that they did so to try and benefit Trump and hurt Hillary with said infiltration

- it is FACT that Trump and his Campaign lied incessantly at every instance about contacts, links and coordinations with Russia


----------


These were core elements of why the Mueller investigation was put together and on all counts he nailed Trump and his campaign. Those are undisputed FACTS.


(do I need to post all the convictions as 'no evidence to discuss'?)



Go troll someplace else with your 'no evidence to discuss'.

 

[bobgeese]

ha troll.

Only Trumpsters care about Barr's report.


We haven't seen any evidence to discuss... really?...

--------

Newly released testimony: Former top FBI lawyer says agency concerned Trump obstructed justice

James Baker, the former top lawyer of the FBI, told lawmakers last fall that there were widespread concerns inside the FBI that President Donald Trump had attempted to obstruct the bureau's investigation into his campaign's links to Russians, according to a newly released transcript of Baker's testimony...

-------

We haven't seen any evidence to discuss... really?...


-------------


- It is FACT that we had a foreign adversarial gov't infiltrating and impacting an election...

- It is FACT that they did so to try and benefit Trump and hurt Hillary with said infiltration

- it is FACT that Trump and his Campaign lied incessantly at every instance about contacts, links and coordinations with Russia


----------


These were core elements of why the Mueller investigation was put together and on all counts he nailed Trump and his campaign. Those are undisputed FACTS.


(do I need to post all the convictions as 'no evidence to discuss'?)



Go troll someplace else with your 'no evidence to discuss'.

Inspector McCan will surely find the crimes Meuller couldn’t...


Again, Rod Rosenstein says your position is bizarre. But by all means, please continue to embarrass yourself. We’re all having a good laugh at you.

 

[Bargey]

ha troll.

Only Trumpsters care about Barr's report.


We haven't seen any evidence to discuss... really?...

--------

Newly released testimony: Former top FBI lawyer says agency concerned Trump obstructed justice

James Baker, the former top lawyer of the FBI, told lawmakers last fall that there were widespread concerns inside the FBI that President Donald Trump had attempted to obstruct the bureau's investigation into his campaign's links to Russians, according to a newly released transcript of Baker's testimony...

-------

We haven't seen any evidence to discuss... really?...


-------------


- It is FACT that we had a foreign adversarial gov't infiltrating and impacting an election...

- It is FACT that they did so to try and benefit Trump and hurt Hillary with said infiltration

- it is FACT that Trump and his Campaign lied incessantly at every instance about contacts, links and coordinations with Russia


----------


These were core elements of why the Mueller investigation was put together and on all counts he nailed Trump and his campaign. Those are undisputed FACTS.


(do I need to post all the convictions as 'no evidence to discuss'?)



Go troll someplace else with your 'no evidence to discuss'.

Nice rant and still no evidence.A “former lawyer of the FBI” who has “sources”. Right - because the FBI insiders who hate Trump have proven themselves to be so honest, right?

But anyway - None of the points made were mentioned in Barr’s summation of Muller’s Report. And all your ‘facts’ aren’t actually facts. There just made up points probably lifted from CNN, Vox or huffpost.

The question for you is: Why are you so offended by the real facts - that there has been no evidence of collusion or obstruction?

 

[MikeMcMann]

Nice rant and still no evidence.A “former lawyer of the FBI” who has “sources”. Right - because the FBI insiders who hate Trump have proven themselves to be so honest, right?

But anyway - None of the points made were mentioned in Barr’s summation of Muller’s Report. And all your ‘facts’ aren’t actually facts. There just made up points probably lifted from CNN, Vox or huffpost.

The question for you is: Why are you so offended by the real facts - that there has been no evidence of collusion or obstruction?

lets take it to the Bet thread that my facts are not Facts if you believe what you say.

I will post the indictments, the guilty pleas, the guilty verdicts, the proof Trump son and insiders met with Russians. The proof Russians meddled. And you take the side non of those are facts.

Stand behind your words if you believe them or duck and prove you do not. I will give you 12:1 odds. I get your sig and Av for 1 month if I win and you get mine for 12 months if I lose.

 

[andnowweknow]

lets take it to the Bet thread that my facts are not Facts if you believe what you say.

I will post the indictments, the guilty pleas, the guilty verdicts, the proof Trump son and insiders met with Russians. The proof Russians meddled. And you take the side non of those are facts.

Stand behind your words if you believe them or duck and prove you do not. I will give you 12:1 odds. I get your sig and Av for 1 month if I win and you get mine for 12 months if I lose.

Why would you debate the merits of truth (ie facts) with people clearly uninterested in it (Trump supporters)?

 

[MikeMcMann]

Why would you debate the merits of truth (ie facts) with people clearly uninterested in it (Trump supporters)?

I know. You should just ignore trolls.

But i find it fun to pin them when they claim something so easily proven thru a bet and watching them run the other way and NEVER take the bets offered.

This is the easiest bet ever. Either I post 'evidence' or 'facts' in the Bet thread and win or I lose. He claims there are none and I have none. Lets see if he stands behind that. But we both know he won't.

 

[bobgeese]

lets take it to the Bet thread that my facts are not Facts if you believe what you say.

I will post the indictments, the guilty pleas, the guilty verdicts, the proof Trump son and insiders met with Russians. The proof Russians meddled. And you take the side non of those are facts.

Stand behind your words if you believe them or duck and prove you do not. I will give you 12:1 odds. I get your sig and Av for 1 month if I win and you get mine for 12 months if I lose.

^^^ Tin foil hat alert.

“Trumps sons met with Russians”

That not illegal, it’s opposition research. If it was illegal, Meullers report wouldn’t have stated nobody in the campaign conspired with the Russians.


“I’ll post indictments”

None of which are conspiracy, which was the entire focus of the left for two years.

Meullers report flopped, Trump walked, and he has the best weapon he could hope for in 2020.


Now please, tell us again about the core mandate...

 

[Bargey]

lets take it to the Bet thread that my facts are not Facts if you believe what you say.

I will post the indictments, the guilty pleas, the guilty verdicts, the proof Trump son and insiders met with Russians. The proof Russians meddled. And you take the side non of those are facts.

Stand behind your words if you believe them or duck and prove you do not. I will give you 12:1 odds. I get your sig and Av for 1 month if I win and you get mine for 12 months if I lose.

Oh so now the test is “met with Russians”

Ok brah, you win that little strawman game.

 

[MikeMcMann]

Oh so now the test is “met with Russians”

Ok brah, you win that little strawman game.

haha I knew you would dick tuck and run.

Met with Russians and lied about it, yes. All at a time when Russians were interfering in the election. Serious stuff. Stuff to talk about. Yes.

 

[Bargey]

haha I knew you would dick tuck and run.

Met with Russians and lied about it, yes. All at a time when Russians were interfering in the election. Serious stuff. Stuff to talk about. Yes.

Quick go tell Uncle Bob so he can put it in his report and impeach! Impeach, I say!!

 

[bobgeese]

haha I knew you would dick tuck and run.

Met with Russians and lied about it, yes. All at a time when Russians were interfering in the election. Serious stuff. Stuff to talk about. Yes.

“Stuff to talk about”







My, we’ve come a long was from, “Kushner and Jr are going to prison”

To,

“Stuff to talk about”






This shit just keeps getting better.

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

Synonyms for spying

• surveillance
• bugging
• observing
• prying
• voyeurism
• surveyance
• wiretapping

Not synonyms Bob, "colloquies", Trump's best people know the best words.

"when the attorney general of the United States uses the word ‘spying,’ it’s rather provocative and in my view unnecessarily inflammatory.” Senator Brain Schatz stated to Barr.

“Um, did you say that I said that it occurred?" " I just want to make it clear, thinking back on all the different colloquies here, that I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred,” Barr offered at the close of the hearing. “I am saying I am concerned about it and looking into it, that’s all.”

<{ByeHomer}>

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

What if Trump would have said.....They had spies infiltrate my campaign.

That would have been super crazy

So you agree that what Trump said was crazy.

And yes, his campaign was under investigation, and the FBI kept that investigation quiet heading into the election, not exactly what you do when you are trying to torpedo a campaign with a nefariously politically motivated investigation to try to stop someone from being elected, no?

As for spying: "I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred,” Barr offered at the close of the hearing. “I am saying I am concerned about it and looking into it, that’s all.”

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

What exactly did GP do to “earn” being set up by Stefan Halper?

What did Page do?

Neither man had conspiracy charges. Furthermore,

“Department of Justice court records from 2015 have provided details about how Carter Page cooperated with FBI agents in exposing Russian spies working inside the United States.”

Why not just enlist pages help again?


Even best case scenario, the lack of charges of both men is an embarrassment to the fbi.

Cliff Notes:

George P got drunk and blabbed to an Australian diplomat about Russia having dirt on Hillary Clinton, prompting Strzok to open the investigation.

https://thehill.com/policy/national...ulos-info-triggered-fbis-russia-investigation

Page was of concern to the FBI long before Trump (e.g., when the FBI heard Russian spy Podobnyy say that Page's "enthusiasm works for me" that Page "wants to earn a lot of money" and that he is an "idiot" and described his recruitment method of Page as "You promise a favor for a favor. You get the documents from him and tell him to go fuck himself") and he became a concern again after Page's role in Trump's campaign was announced, and Page was invited to give a speech at the New Economic School in Moscow, whose board chairman was Russia's deputy prime minister, and that on that trip Page claimed to have met with "mostly scholars".


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/04/us/politics/carter-page-trump-russia.html

 

[bobgeese]

Not synonyms Bob, "colloquies", Trump's best people know the best words.

"when the attorney general of the United States uses the word ‘spying,’ it’s rather provocative and in my view unnecessarily inflammatory.” Senator Brain Schatz stated to Barr.

“Um, did you say that I said that it occurred?" " I just want to make it clear, thinking back on all the different colloquies here, that I am not saying that improper surveillance occurred,” Barr offered at the close of the hearing. “I am saying I am concerned about it and looking into it, that’s all.”

<{ByeHomer}>

https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/spying

 

[bobgeese]

Cliff Notes:

George P got drunk and blabbed to an Australian diplomat about Russia having dirt on Hillary Clinton, prompting Strzok to open the investigation.

https://thehill.com/policy/national...ulos-info-triggered-fbis-russia-investigation

Page was of concern to the FBI long before Trump (e.g., when the FBI heard Russian spy Podobnyy say that Page's "enthusiasm works for me" that Page "wants to earn a lot of money" and that he is an "idiot" and described his recruitment method of Page as "You promise a favor for a favor. You get the documents from him and tell him to go fuck himself") and he became a concern again after Page's role in Trump's campaign was announced, and Page was invited to give a speech at the New Economic School in Moscow, whose board chairman was Russia's deputy prime minister, and that on that trip Page claimed to have met with "mostly scholars".


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/04/us/politics/carter-page-trump-russia.html

Jesus Christ dude, maybe actually learn the timeline before embarrassing yourself.


“To begin with, the New York Times reported in December of last year that the FBI investigation into possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia began when George Papadopoulos drunkenly boasted to an Australian diplomat about Russian dirt on Hillary Clinton. It was the disclosure of this episode by the Australians that “led the F.B.I. to open an investigation in July 2016 into Russia’s attempts to disrupt the election and whether any of President Trump’s associates conspired,” the NYT claimed.

But it now seems clear that Halper’s attempts to gather information for the FBI began before that. “The professor’s interactions with Trump advisers began a few weeks before the opening of the investigation, when Page met the professor at the British symposium,” the Post reported.

And it suggests that CIA operatives, apparently working with at least some factions within the FBI, were trying to gather information about the Trump campaign earlier than had been previously reported.

Then there are questions about what appear to be some fairly substantial government payments to Halper throughout 2016. Halper continues to be listed as a “vendor” by websites that track payments by the federal government to private contractors.”

- Glenn greenwald.

 

[MikeMcMann]

Quick go tell Uncle Bob so he can put it in his report and impeach! Impeach, I say!!

holy crap you are painfully dumb. The info came from Mueller,you dolt.