Social Spying on Trump confirmed: Operation Crossfire Hurricane ***UPDATE: Comey Admits, "I Was Wrong" ***

[Cake4Breakfast]

That’s a fancy way of dancing around my statement.


Btw, the IG is taking this very seriously. Halper has been interviewed 3 times.

IG + AG > cake

Your dodge is noted

 

[Wingslaught]

its not really that poetic. Obamas administration, by and large, wasnt crawling with corruption, cronyism, and outright illegality. Its why theres only been one of his staffers in hot water vs Trumps admin having dozens of possible convictions.
Conservatives would count as a victory 1 Obama staffer getting jail time if it meant 100 Trump bots get pokey time.

Maybe he was better at deflecting scrutiny onto his political opponents. One has to wonder why he was so eager to scapegoat Republicans 24/7. My guess is it's because he was up to all kinds of no good behind the scenes.

 

[Wingslaught]

LOL, look who is still stuck in Trump's 2016 campaign rhetoric.

Hey, bud, you might check in with Trump. He's updated his position. They are very much our enemies in terms of global politics. They align with Iran, Syria, and China on almost everything. They are also closely allied with nations like Egypt.

Yes, I agree. This Trump talking point won't age well, imo. Russia probably will always be America's geo-political foe. Mistaking rivals or enemies for allies can put one into a highly disadvantageous position.

 

[Cake4Breakfast]

I made fun of this exact point by Trump in the post above your post.

Usually, when someone says "my wires were tapped" he is not referring to two "coffee boy"s and someone "who was on my team for a very short period" having their intercepted communications and financial records examined. And those three earned that scrutiny.

 

[bobgeese]

I made fun of this exact point by Trump in the post above your post.

Usually, when someone says "my wires were tapped" he is not referring to two "coffee boy"s and someone "who was on my team for a very short period" having their intercepted communications and financial records examined. And those three earned that scrutiny.

What exactly did GP do to “earn” being set up by Stefan Halper?

What did Page do?

Neither man had conspiracy charges. Furthermore,

“Department of Justice court records from 2015 have provided details about how Carter Page cooperated with FBI agents in exposing Russian spies working inside the United States.”

Why not just enlist pages help again?


Even best case scenario, the lack of charges of both men is an embarrassment to the fbi.

 

[SBJJ]

I made fun of this exact point by Trump in the post above your post.

Usually, when someone says "my wires were tapped" he is not referring to two "coffee boy"s and someone "who was on my team for a very short period" having their intercepted communications and financial records examined. And those three earned that scrutiny.

What if Trump would have said.....They had spies infiltrate my campaign.

That would have been super crazy

 

[bobgeese]

What if Trump would have said.....They had spies infiltrate my campaign.

That would have been super crazy

Nope, nope, not a spy.


He was only a spy the first time he was caught spying on a presidential campaign, which was outlined in detail in both the nyt, and WP...


And besides, he wasn’t spying on trump, he was spying on the Russians...

 

[SBJJ]

Nope, nope, not a spy.


He was only a spy the first time he was caught spying on a presidential campaign, which was outlined in detail in both the nyt, and WP...


And besides, he wasn’t spying on trump, he was spying on the Russians...

Yup. All this shit that is the textbook definition of spying is actually not spying

Fuckin Clapper can't make up his mind. Brennan is in hiding. And Comey is looking at the trees and cloud formations to get answers

 

[Bargey]

Nothing to settle.

Stop making shit up.

The guys who think their opinion is the end all are the ones saying 'if you do not have a conviction in court then you have nothing to discuss here'. That is not my view. My view is we, that is right WE, can discuss these things rightly based on evidence, and that evidence is not limited to what is only decided in a court.

So again stop making shit up as my position is the opposite of what you say and yours is closer to what you say.

Sherdog is not a court of law and the pretend lawyers here who always demand a court level standard and then proclaiming victory if that threshold is not meant are just clowns who watch too much Matlock.

If you don’t indict, you can’t incite.

Now that’s a legal saying but it applies in a moral sense to all discussions including online forums. Of course you can say what you want but we have objective standards when it comes to people’s culpability and responsibility in any situation of wrong doing. You want to look like an idiot and talk about “well this is my view of the evidence that I haven’t actually seen but blah blah....”

That makes you look like a dope or simply that you just can’t handle the outcome.

 

[bobgeese]

Yup. All this shit that is the textbook definition of spying is actually not spying

Fuckin Clapper can't make up his mind. Brennan is in hiding. And Comey is looking at the trees and cloud formations to get answers

Synonyms for spying

• surveillance
• bugging
• observing
• prying
• voyeurism
• surveyance
• wiretapping

 

[MikeMcMann]

If you don’t indict, you can’t incite.

Now that’s a legal saying but it applies in a moral sense to all discussions including online forums. Of course you can say what you want but we have objective standards when it comes to people’s culpability and responsibility in any situation of wrong doing. You want to look like an idiot and talk about “well this is my view of the evidence that I haven’t actually seen but blah blah....”

That makes you look like a dope or simply that you just can’t handle the outcome.

Its a bullshit standard that does not apply.

There is a reason, for instance why a President can be brought down by evidence in an Impeachment that might not be sufficient to get a conviction in court.

If we see a video of a crime but because of how the warrant or evidence was handled they cannot enter that video evidence to a jury and the person walks, we can certainly talk about the person as guilty of doing a crime. We do not have to pretend we are in court and ignore what we clearly see as evidence.

Trying to apply a court conviction standard to such discussions is BS, but that said you should never pretend the person was also convicted in court if they were not. They can be guilty as hell but unconvicted and that is totally fair.

 

[Bargey]

Its a bullshit standard that does not apply.

There is a reason, for instance why a President can be brought down by evidence in an Impeachment that might not be sufficient to get a conviction in court.

If we see a video of a crime but because of how the warrant or evidence was handled they cannot enter that video evidence to a jury and the person walks, we can certainly talk about the person as guilty of doing a crime. We do not have to pretend we are in court and ignore what we clearly see as evidence.

Trying to apply a court conviction standard to such discussions is BS, but that said you should never pretend the person was also convicted in court if they were not. They can be guilty as hell but unconvicted and that is totally fair.

Apples and oranges. You haven’t seen any evidence of anything. All we have is that he’s been totally exonerated of collusion and a major lack of evidence of obstruction. This is no “well he’s guilty but he got off on a technicality....”

So, by all means, contact your Democrat overlords and voice your support for impeachment due to the “evidence of something-I-don’t-know-what....”

 

[bobgeese]

You haven’t seen any evidence of anything.”

Brah, do you even Rachael Maddow? Her whole show last night was filled with evidence.





Surely, if they only put Rachael in charge of the case, then they’d get that rascally trump!!!

 

[unimackpass]

Excellent work.

 

[WTF2008]

Apples and oranges. You haven’t seen any evidence of anything. All we have is that he’s been totally exonerated of collusion and a major lack of evidence of obstruction. This is no “well he’s guilty but he got off on a technicality....”

So, by all means, contact your Democrat overlords and voice your support for impeachment due to the “evidence of something-I-don’t-know-what....”

Remember when it was a huge conspiracy theory that the Obama administration was spying on Trump.

Now it's "common knowledge" and of course he was. Like it's some normal thing.

2 years people put up with a fake stolen election conspiracy.

But try to actually investigate the illegalities of said investigation and it's somehow treason or sour grapes.

 

[DIDM]

I dont get why everyone made a big deal of Barrs admission today.

I thought we already knew Obama was spying on Trump for over a year now

It was never admitted, it was all conspiracy theory

 

[unimackpass]

What if Trump would have said.....They had spies infiltrate my campaign.

That would have been super crazy

That would be some serious tinfoil hat shit right there. Could you imagine homer and his ilk going batshit crazy over a comment like that?

 

[7437]

Apples and oranges. You haven’t seen any evidence of anything. All we have is that he’s been totally exonerated of collusion and a major lack of evidence of obstruction. This is no “well he’s guilty but he got off on a technicality....”

So, by all means, contact your Democrat overlords and voice your support for impeachment due to the “evidence of something-I-don’t-know-what....”

He was totally exonerated of collusion? When. Gonna need a source on that.

 

[bobgeese]

He was totally exonerated of collusion? When. Gonna need a source on that.

“the Special Counsel did not find that any U.S. person or Trump campaign official or associate conspired or knowingly coordinated with the IRA in its efforts”


Rod Rosenstein says it’s ‘completely bizarre’ to say William Barr is ‘trying to mislead people’ on Mueller report

....

There you go 7, Rosenstien (who you probably sucked the cock of for a year straight) says your stance is bizarre.

Congratulations on your tin foil hat.

 

[WTF2008]

CNN didn't or won't report it so the ctrl-left will never know about it or what to think about it.
They need to know what to think and say.