So red shirt guy was Asadulla Emiragaev.

That's all true....however there is video, or at least a photo, of Islam punching DANIS in the head.


that does need to be taken into account, i'm thinking the usual 50,000 performance bonus would be about right
 
There's definitely an element of inbreeding going on in that part of the world. It's very insular, outsiders are not welcome, it's a law of averages that somewhere along the line someone is getting arranged marriages to at least a cousin.

A lot like American Indian Reservations
 
Sneaking up from behind and thowing punches at someone who's exhausted from 20 minutes of fighting ... you call that "fuck someone up" ?

You're a waste of space.


all the noise heard during the riot was people shouting "turn around so i can punch you face to face", very common in brawls
 
395

Other myth debunked: "Hit Conor in the back of the head"
 
Not to be "that guy" but how can caucasians be "racist" towards other caucasians? Pretty sure that's a technical impossibility.
Not true. You can be racist against your own race. Just think today how many SJW white people hate straight white men and blame them for everything ? It's possible bro , just believe in yourself! You can do it!!
 
Not actually part of Khabib's corner. He was Khabib's childhood friend who was in the crowd.

DG3sTfD.jpg

395

zEpH1vL.jpg


So the only people involved in the scuffle in the cage were Khabib's brother (who Conor smacked first to be fair), Tukhugov and this dude, so if they cut Islam Makhachev over this that would be pretty fucked up.
To be fair, he made contact with Conor first
 
Sad to see some people celebrate this. Conor went too far many times, but punching someone from behind is the most cowardly thing you can do
These guys are unhinged simpletons

I'd say it's more cowardly to throw a dolly at a bus full of innocent bystanders than to punch a guy who just punched a guy.
 
You are exactly "that guy" if you want to nitpick about semantics. Everyone knows that the term "racism" in every day use doesn't just apply to race, but ethnic and cultural backgrounds too. You don't hear the term "ethnocentrism", or others that could apply, being used much at all. Granted, it's probably because a huge portion of people don't even seem to know the difference between a Muslim and an Arab.
No, it's because most people want to use the term that will cause the most controversy despite it not being applicable.

The meaning of the word hasn't changed. People have just become more ignorant and that really isn't excusable imo.
 
I'd say it's more cowardly to throw a dolly at a bus full of innocent bystanders than to punch a guy who just punched a guy.

100% Conor sucker-punched a guy. This can't be disputed. When you do that, you should not expect unified rules to apply.
 
No, it's because most people want to use the term that will cause the most controversy despite it not being applicable.

Why would it cause more controversy? Is being prejudiced about race somehow much worse than being prejudiced about ethnic background or cultures? Prejudice is prejudice.

Also:

"While the concepts of race and ethnicity are considered to be separate in contemporary social science, the two terms have a long history of equivalence in both popular usage and older social science literature. "Ethnicity" is often used in a sense close to one traditionally attributed to "race": the division of human groups based on qualities assumed to be essential or innate to the group (e.g. shared ancestry or shared behavior). Therefore, racism and racial discrimination are often used to describe discrimination on an ethnic or cultural basis, independent of whether these differences are described as racial."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism
 
Red shirt guy pieced Conor up with a blistering combination, lit his ass up like a Christmas tree.
 
Why would it cause more controversy? Is being prejudiced about race somehow much worse than being prejudiced about ethnic background or cultures? Prejudice is prejudice.

Also:

"While the concepts of race and ethnicity are considered to be separate in contemporary social science, the two terms have a long history of equivalence in both popular usage and older social science literature. "Ethnicity" is often used in a sense close to one traditionally attributed to "race": the division of human groups based on qualities assumed to be essential or innate to the group (e.g. shared ancestry or shared behavior). Therefore, racism and racial discrimination are often used to describe discrimination on an ethnic or cultural basis, independent of whether these differences are described as racial."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism
You know as well as I do "racism" is a far more impactful term than "prejudice".

Not sure what you are trying to prove with that excerpt, it's basically just saying the term has been being misused for longer than I thought, doesn't change the fact it's being misused though.
 
Back
Top