- Joined
- Feb 27, 2018
- Messages
- 1,350
- Reaction score
- 911
your argument comes down to how somebody might feel about their vote...
its not a real argument.
No, that's not my argument at all. You must be a slow one too.
your argument comes down to how somebody might feel about their vote...
its not a real argument.
States already have rights and representation. They're called their congressional representatives.
Since you're hung up on this, I'll present it to you this way. Every state has a number of votes (kind of like how every state has a number of votes in the EC). However, unlike the EC the number of votes at most is the number of citizens in the state that have the right to vote. It may be less than that if less citizens vote. All those votes get tallied. EXCEPT instead of ONLY the majority votes in a state getting represented in the final total tally, even the minority votes get tallied in the final total. Every state sends their majority and minority votes to the final tally. The majority of all those votes tallied together is what decides the President. That is equal representation for everybody and everyone within a state gets their vote counted. Excellent, yes? YES.
No, that's not my argument at all. You must be a slow one too.
you dont know what you argue
thats the problem
Basically grimballer is saying Murka isn't really a country.
well its on the states to decide that cause its not a unitary state with centralized government...
why is that so hard?
You're just playing dumb because there's no reasonable counter to why every vote shouldn't count.
just cause its decentralized doesn't mean its not a country...
why lefties always push for centralized dictatorships?
Yes, the states can amend the Constitution. That doesn't actually form an argument against my proposal and explanation for popular vote for President, which can still be viewed as a state representative act. So you agree with me? Popular vote is excellent and best? Okay, I accept your concession.
Are you even from the US?
every vote counts....
why are you against smaller states being represented?
Who says they're not? Every State has two Senators and a proportional number of Representatives, so what are you crying about?
those are separate issues...
if states decide they want popular vote in presidential elections thats their decision.
what you arguing doesn't make sense the way us is set up right now.
theres no reason for smaller states to accept even less representation in presidential elections
are you?
Yes, which is why I do not know why you brought it up just to agree with me.
It's actually everyone's decision if we want to do away with the electoral college. Please learn about the Constitution.
You do know this thread is about a hypothetical situation right?
They get representation that is true to their citizen size. 1 citizen = 1 vote. It's the best. Smaller states already have the Senate for equal State representation and the house is skewed proportionally for more representation to smaller states as well. You just like oppressing larger states because you have a mind that does not value equality.
Yes. Now answer the question.
you constantly mix things up
so you change constitution via nation wide referendum?
interesting...
doesnt mean it shouldn't be practical
oh yes, larger states are so oppressed by states with 3 ec...
what happened to equity?
And pretty much everyone's life has gotten better under Biden's presidency.
so you dont know basic things about us politics?