Sherdog POTWR: Round 4: The General Election

[Prime Ang]

Illegal.

Pussy

 

[NelmarksGhost]

Pussy

Stick to sports. You are not a WR kinda guy.

 

[Gandhi]

GNN Prediction !!!!!!!

Based on having too much time on our hands and some very bad math, GNN is confidently predicting on very little basis that JDragon will be the next PRESIDENT OF THE WAR ROOM.

Never mind that it is to early or to close to call. Or even that Palis is technically in the lead.

Please see table below, which explains why none of this matters!!!!!!

Palis leads by one vote as of the latest count (62 to Dragons 61). So the answer remains what will happen with the 47 remaining eligible voters who have not yet cast a ballot?

Based on mathematical extrapolation supplemented by a detailed review of posting patterns, GNN has made the following predictions:

1) Palis will steal another 2 voters that voted for a non deplorable last round while JDragon will retain 6 of them

2) All 4 remaining voters who opted for a non deplorable will vote for Palis

3) The big prize is that untapped reservoir of 33 voters who did not participate at all in the last round.

A detailed review of posting history performed by GNN has revealed that 17 of these voters are not deplorable, 9 are deplorable, while 7 are neither/unknown at this time.

GNN has calculated that even if the more motivated deplorables show up in droves it may not be enough for Palis. Even if 75% of the remaining deplorables who did not vote last round, showed up tomorrow (gaining Palis 7 votes), Jdragon would only needs a little 53% of the remaining non deplorable votes to win by 1 vote.

From this analysis GNN is calling the election for the Dragon within the expected statistical discrepancy of +/- 50% margin of error, 10 times out of 20.

YOU HEARD IT HERE FIRST

JUST WOW1!1!1!

 

[Prime Ang]

Stick to sports. You are not a WR kinda guy.

I post in the war room often, very often, we don't cross paths because I skim thru your shit posts

 

[NelmarksGhost]

I post in the war room often, very often, we don't cross paths because I skim thru your shit posts

So, if we examined your posts most of them would be in the WR other than this thread to get your buddy Palis elected?

 

[Prime Ang]

So, if we examined your posts most of them would be in the WR other than this thread to get your buddy Palis elected?

No, but I do post in the WR often, majority of my posts are in the Sports bar, but I have lots of posts

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

lol at @Lead's inability to follow his own rules while pretending he's not bias as fuck.

What a sham. Should change his name to @microcosm.

 

[Lead]

lol at @Lead's inability to follow his own rules while pretending he's not bias as fuck.

What a sham. Should change his name to @microcosm.

There wasn;t a rule in place for a person asking to be taken off the list and then subsequently asking to be added back and vote. The only person at fault for this entire thing is Aged Flatus being a complete dumbass.

He was removed before he voted so it had nothing to do with Palis.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

There wasn;t a rule in place for a person asking to be taken off the list and then subsequently asking to be added back and vote. The only person at fault for this entire thing is Aged Flatus being a complete dumbass.

He was removed before he voted so it had nothing to do with Palis.

Call it what you will, but the list was set and the dude didn't want spammed. He never asked to be removed from voting eligibility. Regardless, there's no precedent for removing someone from the rolls so if you don't count his vote that's a bit hypocritical. Can't say the list is the list and then decide to remove someone. That's what the next cycle is for. Or at least that's what you say when convenient.

 

[Lead]

Call it what you will, but the list was set and the dude didn't want spammed. He never asked to be removed from voting eligibility. Regardless, there's no precedent for removing someone from the rolls so if you don't count his vote that's a bit hypocritical. Can't say the list is the list and then decide to remove someone. That's what the next cycle is for. Or at least that's what you say when convenient.

It isn't hipocritical cause at the time I did it, the thinking was it wouldn't have affected the result of the election. When you add someone, it does because the person is expected to vote. A person asking to be removed you would assume isn't voting and nothing of consequence happened.

Again, this isn't a problem and it opens two scenarios. You are comparing someone being asked to be ADDED vs Removed. When someone asks to be added, you would assume the election results would change. When someone asks to be removed you assume nothing will change because they don't want involved and would be an asshole to come back and vote and then complain. For you're argument to work, you would have to take positon 1

1.) The registry is locked in every sense, including removals even by request of the user. Aged Flatus never should've been removed from the beginning cause he didn't have the power to remove himself from the list after Round 1.
2.) A user can only be removed by their own request. Once done, they are seen as any other user not on the registry after Round 1 and cannot request to be added.

Also, regardless of what happens for this, Aged Flatus will not be on any registers going forward. That is something I can promise.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

It isn't hipocritical cause at the time I did it, the thinking was it wouldn't have affected the result of the election.

It's bullshit to not allow his vote is he was eligible at the time you "locked" the registry. If you're going to be such a stickler you won't change a guy's vote who made an electronic error then you really have no justification here for changing the list that you said was set in stone. His vote counts or it's bullshit.

 

[Lead]

It's bullshit to not allow his vote is he was eligible at the time you "locked" the registry. If you're going to be such a stickler you won't change a guy's vote who made an electronic error then you really have no justification here for changing the list that you said was set in stone. His vote counts or it's bullshit.

I showed the two options and both have their own merit. The reason he was removed is because I didn't think he would then vote. He put this on himself and I could care less about all those whining for him. It's about which option is better between the 2. He made the system look bad for no reason other than being an asshole.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

I showed the two options and both have their own merit. The reason he was removed is because I didn't think he would then vote. He put this on himself and I could care less about all the whiny for him. It's about which option is better between the 2. He made the system look bad for no reason other than being an asshole.

Let me get this straight. Your intuition and someone's disposition are what makes for revocation of eligibility? That's not really a justification for removing someone while refusing to add long time posters or fixing an errant ballot. The word for that is rationalization.

 

[Lead]

Let me get this straight. Your intuition and someone's disposition are what makes for revocation of eligibility? That's not really a justification for removing someone while refusing to add long time posters or fixing an errant ballot. The word for that is rationalization.

You are constantly ignoring what I said. The point is here. Everything else is just me bitching about how stupid Aged Flatus is which doesn't factor into anything. I just want to make it clear how stupid he is.

Again, this isn't a problem and it opens two scenarios. You are comparing someone being asked to be ADDED vs Removed. When someone asks to be added, you would assume the election results would change. When someone asks to be removed you assume nothing will change because they don't want involved and would be an asshole to come back and vote and then complain. For you're argument to work, you would have to take positon 1

1.) The registry is locked in every sense, including removals even by request of the user. Aged Flatus never should've been removed from the beginning cause he didn't have the power to remove himself from the list after Round 1.
2.) A user can only be removed by their own request. Once done, they are seen as any other user not on the registry after Round 1 and cannot request to be added.

You're refusing to actually take the two clear options I'm showing and twisting every post I make. I'm not arguing for either option at this point. I'm just saying they are the only two which make sense. You just keep crying for the one you want which isn't something I'm arguing against you about. Lead says hey Cubo, since this ridiculous hypthoethetical came up, there has to be a ruling for these two scenarios while Cubo says thats bullshit Lead, 1 is the best!. I never said 1 wasn't the best. I'm telling you it's those two options and one needs to be decided on.

I made that post BEFORE Hans made the one above about the lock too so I'm not suddenly being more honest about this. I got it down to this without Hans input because Hans doesn't care about what the right option is. That's why he bitches about Stoic1 nonstop while he's silent when that Egon guy came in asking.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

You are constantly ignoring what I said. The point is here. Everything else is just me bitching about how stupid Aged Flatus is which doesn't factor into anything. I just want to make it clear how stupid he is.



You're refusing to actually take the two clear options I'm showing and twisting every post I make. I'm not arguing for either option at this point. I'm just saying they are the only two which make sense. You just keep crying for the one you want which isn't something I'm arguing against you about. Lead says hey Cubo, since this ridiculous hypthoethetical came up, there has to be a ruling for these two scenarios while Cubo says thats bullshit Lead, 1 is the best!. I never said 1 wasn't the best. I'm telling you it's those two options and one needs to be decided on.

I made that post BEFORE Hans made the one above about the lock too so I'm not suddenly being more honest about this. I got it down to this without Hans input because Hans doesn't care about what the right option is. That's why he bitches about Stoic1 nonstop while he's silent when that Egon guy came in asking.

Look bro, I wasn't really paying that much attention. I was just piling on when I saw an opportunity.

 

[Anung Un Rama]

Umm, that didn't help your case

Also, you can't get on now cause it's after round 1. We had a whole week where regulars could come in and asked to be added if they didn't see their name. It's not a perfect system but it did okay this year around and the list will likely increase next year

Egon is a WR poster, too. I vouch for him.

 

[Lead]

Look bro, I wasn't really paying that much attention. I was just piling on when I saw an opportunity.

 

[Lead]

Egon is a WR poster, too. I vouch for him.

I know he is. My point was just that I wasn't enforcing rules when someone likely to vote Palis came in. Egon literally said "I'm going to vote for the more left leaning guy" but that didn't matter.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

 

[Lead]