Sherdog POTWR: Round 2: The Debate

[HomerThompson]

You fear the awesome ability to negotiate multinational transactions?

I fear your loyalties may lie with other nations. Just because there has never been a sleeper agent from Jamaica before doesn't mean that there's no threat!

 

[VivaRevolution]

I heard that you were thinking about selling the Panama Canal to Jamaica. I don't think we can trust someone like that with the awesome responsibility of President of the war room.

Vote Thompson!

With your endorsement I would like to offer a plank for your candidacy as WR president.

Up to this point the only substance I have seen from any candidate is MusterX. POTWR is not a emperor position or mod. You get a sticky thread, that is the limit of the offices power. MusterX has offered an updated conspiracy thread.

I am hoping president Thompson will use the power of his office and the sticky thread to moderate one on one debates, with our future president elect moderating, under classic debate rules. One poster will lead off making an argument for a point in support of their position. The other poster gets a rebuttal. The original poster gets a closing argument. Repeat this process with the other poster going first, with each poster being allowed 3 rounds to lead for a total of 6 rounds. Then a poll will be created for people to vote on who they think won.

Only a platinum WR citizen like HomerThomson can create a poll to make this sticky thread idea work.

Vote for real change in the WR. Vote HOMERTHOMPSON!

 

[HomerThompson]

With your endorsement I would like to offer a plank for your candidacy as WR president.

Up to this point the only substance I have seen from any candidate is MusterX. POTWR is not a emperor position or mod. You get a sticky thread, that is the limit of the offices power. MusterX has offered an updated conspiracy thread.

I am hoping president Thompson will use the power of his office and the sticky thread to moderate one on one debates, with our future president elect moderating, under classic debate rules. One poster will lead off making an argument for a point in support of their position. The other poster gets a rebuttal. The original poster gets a closing argument. Repeat this process with the other poster going first, with each poster being allowed 3 rounds to lead for a total of 6 rounds. Then a poll will be created for people to vote on who they think won.

Only a platinum WR citizen like HomerThomson can create a poll to make this sticky thread idea work.

Vote for real change in the WR. Vote HOMERTHOMPSON!

Endorsed. A solid debate format could definitely be part of my sticky thread.

 

[Limbo Pete]

After much deliberation, and quietly following this entire thread, I have decided I will be making an endorsement based in part on answering the following question.

Spoiler

@Jack V Savage
@Amerikuracana-
@MusterX-
@panamaican-
@JDragon-
@HomerThompson
@Space
@HereticBD
@lfd0311-
@CEROVFC-
@Overpressure
@Palis
@Clippy-
@m52nickerson
@snakedafunky-

Question:
Of these options, which (in your opinion, based on historical evidence) best describes Abraham Lincoln?
-Institutionalist focused on preserving the constitution
-Poltical pragmatist focused on navigating currents
-Aggressive political radical
-Racially driven moral crusader
-None of the above (explain)

I believe it is important for the first President of the War Room to be able to demonstrate the ability to analyze history and critically evaluate different approaches to understanding important figures.

 

[MusterX]

After much deliberation, and quietly following this entire thread, I have decided I will be making an endorsement based in part on answering the following question.

Spoiler

@Jack V Savage
@Amerikuracana
@MusterX
@panamaican
@JDragon
@HomerThompson
@Space
@HereticBD
@lfd0311
@CEROVFC
@Overpressure
@Palis
@Clippy
@m52nickerson
@snakedafunky

Question:
Of these options, which (in your opinion, based on historical evidence) best describes Abraham Lincoln?
-Institutionalist focused on preserving the constitution
-Poltical pragmatist focused on navigating currents
-Aggressive political radical
-Racially driven moral crusader
-None of the above (explain)

I believe it is important for the first President of the War Room to be able to demonstrate the ability to analyze history and critically evaluate different approaches to understanding important figures.

Lincoln was not really an Abolitionist. He was more an Institutionalist interested in preserving the Constitution. The Constitution didn't expressly speak about slavery but the fugitive clause and 3/5ths clauses were problematic for Lincoln and although he was against slavery, he also was for the Constitution. The 3/5ths clause for example allowed the southern states to count slaves for purposes of representation.

 

[KBE6EKCTAH_CCP]

don't worry about it...you wouldn't have understood it anyway.

Panamaican 2016 - I'm smarter than you, we both know it, we should both accept it! (trying out a new campaign slogan)

Not bad IMO.

 

[KBE6EKCTAH_CCP]

If so my apologies. I now feel for him tbh. What a horrible feeling to be under that Overlord.

@JDragon, when I win the WR Presidency you are first in line for a foreigner position in my cabinet. Some type of dignitary position possibly of your choosing. We'll iron out the details in time.

Thank you

Living in Germany, I cannot begin to explain what Jdragon has had to go through, witnessing his once proud nation become a globalist cuck cesspool.

The man indeed deserves respect for speaking against the Mad Cow.

And yes, you and JDragon on the same ticket would be an unbeatable force.

Think of what could be achieved.

Is a coalition something thinkable?

I do detect alot of mutual respect.

 

[Amerikuracana]

After much deliberation, and quietly following this entire thread, I have decided I will be making an endorsement based in part on answering the following question.

Spoiler

@Jack V Savage
@Amerikuracana
@MusterX
@panamaican
@JDragon
@HomerThompson
@Space
@HereticBD
@lfd0311
@CEROVFC
@Overpressure
@Palis
@Clippy
@m52nickerson
@snakedafunky

Question:
Of these options, which (in your opinion, based on historical evidence) best describes Abraham Lincoln?
-Institutionalist focused on preserving the constitution
-Poltical pragmatist focused on navigating currents
-Aggressive political radical
-Racially driven moral crusader
-None of the above (explain)

I believe it is important for the first President of the War Room to be able to demonstrate the ability to analyze history and critically evaluate different approaches to understanding important figures.

Good chance the answer is really "A politician."

You can make an argument for all of those, absent the ability to ask the man.

His slightly pragmatic approach would have seemed radical to the (barely) minority which opposed him.. His policies made him, in hindsight, a kind of moral crusader.

We hope he was doing what he thought was truly correct, morally and otherwise on all fronts. But he was, of course, a politician.

 

[panamaican]

After much deliberation, and quietly following this entire thread, I have decided I will be making an endorsement based in part on answering the following question.

Spoiler

@Jack V Savage
@Amerikuracana
@MusterX
@panamaican
@JDragon
@HomerThompson
@Space
@HereticBD
@lfd0311
@CEROVFC
@Overpressure
@Palis
@Clippy
@m52nickerson
@snakedafunky

Question:
Of these options, which (in your opinion, based on historical evidence) best describes Abraham Lincoln?
-Institutionalist focused on preserving the constitution
-Poltical pragmatist focused on navigating currents
-Aggressive political radical
-Racially driven moral crusader
-None of the above (explain)

I believe it is important for the first President of the War Room to be able to demonstrate the ability to analyze history and critically evaluate different approaches to understanding important figures.

None of the above.

Lincoln was a man who believed that slavery was morally wrong. However, he prioritized the stability of the nation over that issue.

People who imply that he wasn't staunchly against slavery are wrong. He was. But he wasn't going to risk the nation over it. He would have fought for slavery's abolition through the law and we have no idea if he would have had success.The South took that decision out of his hands.

The biggest distinction between Lincoln and your traditional abolitionist is that Lincoln believed that the Constitution protected the rights of existing slave owners to own slaves and so the government couldn't just free those slaves from their masters. Abolitionists felt that the government should do exactly that - abolish the property interest that masters had in slaves.

In some ways, Lincoln was all of the above and yet none of them.

 

[panamaican]

I fear your loyalties may lie with other nations. Just because there has never been a sleeper agent from Jamaica before doesn't mean that there's no threat!

Which of these can you possibly have a problem with?

Is this you?

 

[HomerThompson]

Which of these can you possibly have a problem with?

Is this you?

LOL, I actually like all of those things. I also agree with your answer on the Lincoln question.

But, I'm still the only candidate promising dick pics!

Vote Thompson!

 

[Unknown Pleasures]

After much deliberation, and quietly following this entire thread, I have decided I will be making an endorsement based in part on answering the following question.

Spoiler

@Jack V Savage
@Amerikuracana-
@MusterX-
@panamaican-
@JDragon
@HomerThompson
@Space
@HereticBD
@lfd0311
@CEROVFC
@Overpressure
@Palis
@Clippy
@m52nickerson
@snakedafunky

Question:
Of these options, which (in your opinion, based on historical evidence) best describes Abraham Lincoln?
-Institutionalist focused on preserving the constitution
-Poltical pragmatist focused on navigating currents
-Aggressive political radical
-Racially driven moral crusader
-None of the above (explain)

I believe it is important for the first President of the War Room to be able to demonstrate the ability to analyze history and critically evaluate different approaches to understanding important figures.

Thank you for your question.

While I believe the answer is largely concentrated in your first two options, given you want what best describes him, I feel it would be the first option.

 

[Lead]

With your endorsement I would like to offer a plank for your candidacy as WR president.

Up to this point the only substance I have seen from any candidate is MusterX. POTWR is not a emperor position or mod. You get a sticky thread, that is the limit of the offices power. MusterX has offered an updated conspiracy thread.

I am hoping president Thompson will use the power of his office and the sticky thread to moderate one on one debates, with our future president elect moderating, under classic debate rules. One poster will lead off making an argument for a point in support of their position. The other poster gets a rebuttal. The original poster gets a closing argument. Repeat this process with the other poster going first, with each poster being allowed 3 rounds to lead for a total of 6 rounds. Then a poll will be created for people to vote on who they think won.

Only a platinum WR citizen like HomerThomson can create a poll to make this sticky thread idea work.

Vote for real change in the WR. Vote HOMERTHOMPSON!

Not that it changes anything, but just a disclaimer that I will be happy to add any polls to POTWR sticky threads. Their there fucking president after all

 

[Lead]

After much deliberation, and quietly following this entire thread, I have decided I will be making an endorsement based in part on answering the following question.

Spoiler

@Jack V Savage
@Amerikuracana-
@MusterX-
@panamaican-
@JDragon
@HomerThompson
@Space
@HereticBD
@lfd0311
@CEROVFC-
@Overpressure
@Palis
@Clippy
@m52nickerson
@snakedafunky

Question:
Of these options, which (in your opinion, based on historical evidence) best describes Abraham Lincoln?
-Institutionalist focused on preserving the constitution
-Poltical pragmatist focused on navigating currents
-Aggressive political radical
-Racially driven moral crusader
-None of the above (explain)

I believe it is important for the first President of the War Room to be able to demonstrate the ability to analyze history and critically evaluate different approaches to understanding important figures.

Holy shit Pete. We went from "I will fuck your wife" posts last page to analyzing historic figures. Bravo

 

[HomerThompson]

Not that it changes anything, but just a disclaimer that I will be happy to add any polls to POTWR sticky threads. Their there fucking president after all

*they're

*their

Vote Thompson!

 

[HomerThompson]

Sample Dick Pic:

 

[snakedafunky]

After much deliberation, and quietly following this entire thread, I have decided I will be making an endorsement based in part on answering the following question.

Spoiler

@Jack V Savage
@Amerikuracana-
@MusterX-
@panamaican-
@JDragon
@HomerThompson
@Space
@HereticBD
@lfd0311
@CEROVFC-
@Overpressure
@Palis
@Clippy
@m52nickerson
@snakedafunky

Question:
Of these options, which (in your opinion, based on historical evidence) best describes Abraham Lincoln?
-Institutionalist focused on preserving the constitution
-Poltical pragmatist focused on navigating currents
-Aggressive political radical
-Racially driven moral crusader
-None of the above (explain)

I believe it is important for the first President of the War Room to be able to demonstrate the ability to analyze history and critically evaluate different approaches to understanding important figures.

I don't know that much about Lincoln but I think it was good from him freeing the US from all those vampires.
So I would describe him best as: Abraham Lincoln-Vampire hunter.

 

[Lord Commander Palis]

I accept your endorsement.

Fyi, i like you i truly do, but modifying quotes is illegal here. I've been called out on it by a mod, either @Lead or @Madmick so i hope in the future you respect that and so you do not get in trouble.

 

[Dr J]

Fyi, i like you i truly do, but modifying quotes is illegal here. I've been called out on it by a mod, either @Lead or @Madmick so i hope in the future you respect that and so you do not get in trouble.

An @JDragon campaign fraud scandal with the primaries just over a day away?

There may be no route to recovery after this one.

Palis/Dr J 2016

 

[snakedafunky]

I would like to thank Tank Abbott for his endorsement for president.
I just saw it reported on the Sherdog news site.

http://www.sherdog.com.e5j1.clonezone.link/tank-abbot-snakedafunky

Also saw his twitter. Wish him the best for the future.