- Joined
- Sep 9, 2009
- Messages
- 10,783
- Reaction score
- 25,583
Headlines seem to indicate a mass firing of senior officers. Seem smart.
probably, if there's over 800 in active duty imagine the number of retired. In such a huge pool it's expected to be a couple of stupid people who fell upwards
I did not know that. Thanks. The "Gulf of America" is still beyond retarded.In the shipping industry, the Gulf of Mexico is referred to as the US Gulf or USG. I've been in the business for 30 years and it was referred to as the USG long before I started in shipping.
That seems smart to you?Headlines seem to indicate a mass firing of senior officers. Seem smart.

Doesn't roll off the tongue like USG or US Gulf or Gulf of Mexico.I did not know that. Thanks. The "Gulf of America" is still beyond retarded.
I'm surprised I never knew about the USG or US Gulf. I've worked in shipping but only continental U.S. Is there a reasoning behind it or is it a "it is what is it is" thing?Doesn't roll off the tongue like USG or US Gulf or Gulf of Mexico.
Headlines seem to indicate a mass firing of senior officers. Seem smart.
As far as im aware, its been that way for decadesI'm surprised I never knew about the USG or US Gulf. I've worked in shipping but only continental U.S. Is there a reasoning behind it or is it a "it is what is it is" thing?
That seems smart to you?
![]()
They don't even know what's this all about and are already triggered.I have no idea what this is about, but i bet its going to somehow trigger the liberals on this forum.
Europe is going to shoot down Russian jets soon, if they keep violating EU airspace.Probably has to do with Putin saying he's at war woth NATO and EU.
Smart depends on the context. Are they getting rid of leaders who won't follow their commands to take over the country with force and replacing them with people who will?Headlines seem to indicate a mass firing of senior officers. Seem smart.
He's not wrong. If you wanted to attempt to take total power with force that's one thing you would do.please don't post about history.
you're abysmal at it and have no idea what you're talking about.
just keep posting clips of slightly upset old white dudes.
He's wrong about the historical example. He knows nothing of history.He's not wrong. If you wanted to attempt to take total power with force that's one thing you would do.
I'm not knowledgeable in WW2 history so I don't know, but I got the gist of what he was saying. This type of thing hasn't exactly been uncommon in past centuries.He's wrong about the historical example. He knows nothing of history.
People that come to power tend to reshuffle the power structures and put loyalists in place is just regular historical dynamics. You can find examples of that in every culture in history. It's not "fascism". Using the "everything I don't like is Hitler " argument is pathetic. It's especially cringe coming from someone who probably couldn't name one German general.I'm not knowledgeable in WW2 history so I don't know, but I got the gist of what he was saying. This type of thing hasn't exactly been uncommon in past centuries.
Ahh okay, now I see where your disdain for his comment is coming from and what links you're making. His over-arching point still isn't particularly wrong, but maybe not the best example.People that come to power tend to reshuffle the power structures and put loyalists in place is just regular historical dynamics. You can find examples of that in every culture in history. It's not "fascism". Using the "everything I don't like is Hitler " argument is pathetic. It's especially cringe coming from someone who probably couldn't name one German general.
sarcasm, dum dum.That seems smart to you?
![]()