- Joined
- Nov 2, 2017
- Messages
- 20,431
- Reaction score
- 17,882
RIP
Social Scott Adams (Dilbert Creator) RIP
- Thread starter SurferH2O
- Start date
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2010
- Messages
- 4,552
- Reaction score
- 9,840
That's MAGA people in a nutshell.
They're hateful, bigoted people, who truly think that if a just and loving God exists, that it would somehow be fooled by their games on morality and life. That they could repent on their death bed and everything would be fine, instead of, you know, actually living a live of love and being kind to people.
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2006
- Messages
- 10,460
- Reaction score
- 11,140
It all depends. I know it was fashionable for a while on the left to shit on ivermectin as a horse dewormer but what's missed by such empty rhetoric is that many substances have many purposes and uses. Both of these medications are very effective at treating certain forms of cancer and there are in fact people who went into complete remission from even stage 4 after using these medications for just a few months(after they were given no chances on standard chemo/radiation treatments).
There's now ongoing research of these substances for cancer treatment. Such research is still in the relatively early stages but there's clear initial evidence it works.
I had a close friend who didn't survive his first chemo treatment at just 44. He was initially given 2 years to live with stage 4 colorectal cancer and he died in just 2 months last year. I truly wish he went the ivermectin and fenbendazole route because I think he'd still be alive. Sometimes the cure is worse than the disease.
To summarize this is not quackery. There are in fact well established mechanisms via which these medications work to kill off cancer.
Unexpected Antitumorigenic Effect of Fenbendazole when Combined with Supplementary Vitamins - PMC
Diet containing the anthelminthic fenbendazole is used often to treat rodent pinworm infections because it is easy to use and has few reported adverse effects on research. However, during fenbendazole treatment at our institution, an established ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Oral Fenbendazole for Cancer Therapy in Humans and Animals
Fenbendazole is a benzimidazole anthelmintic agent commonly used to treat animal parasitic infections. In humans, other benzimidazoles, such as mebendazole and albendazole, are used as antiparasitic agents. Since fenbendazole is not currently approved by the FDA or EMA, its pharmacokinetics and...
ar.iiarjournals.org
Anti-cancer effects of fenbendazole on 5-fluorouracil-resistant colorectal cancer cells - PMC
Benzimidazole anthelmintic agents have been recently repurposed to overcome cancers resistant to conventional therapies. To evaluate the anti-cancer effects of benzimidazole on resistant cells, various cell death pathways were investigated in ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Ivermectin has New Application in Inhibiting Colorectal Cancer Cell Growth - PMC
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and still lacks effective therapy. Ivermectin, an antiparasitic drug, has been shown to possess anti-inflammation, anti-virus, and antitumor properties. However, whether ivermectin ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Efficacy of ivermectin against colon cancer induced by dimethylhydrazine in male wistar rats - PMC
Colon cancer (CC) is a common form of cancer worldwide. According to growing incidence of cancer and little information about the possible protective role of Ivermectin (IVM) on colon cancer, this study aimed to investigate the chemoprotective role ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Selective Synergy of Ivermectin Combined With Recombinant Methioninase Against Colon-Cancer Cells in Contrast to Normal Fibroblasts
Background/Aim: Recent studies have shown that ivermectin, developed as an anti-parasitic drug, has efficacy against several cancer types. Methionine restriction, including the use of recombinant methioninase (rMETase), has been developed to target methionine addiction, a fundamental hallmark of...
ar.iiarjournals.org
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
- Messages
- 12,456
- Reaction score
- 8,397
He said a lot of stuff but I think what was pretty out there was that he referenced some poll about how 60% of black people or something like that don't like or are suspicious of white people. His response to that was if that many people don't have a favorable view of white people, I should stay as far away from them as possible. It sounds logical but it is kind of retarded as well. He said a lot of stupid shit, would double down on it when criticized, and feel proud about logically saying why segregation should exist and why women are dumb and incompetent. When he first started talking about this, I at first thought he was trolling and then that he was being paid or was patronizing MAGA. Then I just realized he was a retarded asshole and quit listening to his podcast.
The parts I liked though about his podcast was him breaking down academically why Trump had off the chart persuasion. I still believe this to be the case and if anyone doubts this, listen to a Trump speech and then listen to someone read the transcript. The latter fails so much harder than the former.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2005
- Messages
- 11,696
- Reaction score
- 18,232
No you dumb son of a bitch.
The thrust of the post was look at how biased the left wing is, they have this glowing obit of al-baghdadi, but are so mean to Adams. And that theory falls apart the moment you read the article and see that the first headline referred to him as "terrorist-in-chief"; then the second was the one quoted; then the third settled on "extremist leader of Islamic State."
So no. It would be very stupid to call that some sort of liberal bias when 2/3 of the headlines they cycled through referred to his piece of shit nature. And you idiots do this all the time. You blatantly misrepresent something, get called on it immediately, and then run some version of......"well, technically....."
If the entire point of the shit meme (which i see your hive-mind buddies are spamming in unison), is proven wrong, you don't get to pretend you're on the side of the truth.
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2013
- Messages
- 23,315
- Reaction score
- 48,718
Article written by:
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2010
- Messages
- 4,552
- Reaction score
- 9,840
Articles are invalid because you think the author is ugly, is that what this is? Lol.
Article written by:
No wonder this country is fucked. If someone has to be "hot" in order for you to listen to them and think they have an opinion, then that's insanely gross and weird.
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2013
- Messages
- 23,315
- Reaction score
- 48,718
There's no additional context that makes it okay to have referred to him as an austere religious scholar. The fact it was changed a few times is meaningless.
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2010
- Messages
- 13,554
- Reaction score
- 6,979
Or maybe just grow up, stfu and if you have to post, exercise a little class and just share an obituary in the appropriate section.
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2005
- Messages
- 11,696
- Reaction score
- 18,232
Well it's kinda hard to argue that the headlines were a result of liberal bias, when two of them went a bit far in the other direction. I mean, calling al-baghdadi a "terrorist in chief," is hardly the position of a bleeding lefty.
Nor, is it truthful to omit that they didn't lead, nor end up with, the headline in the meme. But lets be honest, none of the trumpers here reposting it actually checked to see if it was true.
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2010
- Messages
- 4,552
- Reaction score
- 9,840
Typical boomer comment lol. "Anyone I don't agree with is a dipshit who knows nothing."
Y'all consistently show how fucked you are in the head, constant pet names and shit talking and libtard this leftist that, it's fucking hilarious
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2009
- Messages
- 18,749
- Reaction score
- 29,205
Article written by:
Every damn time
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2022
- Messages
- 6,504
- Reaction score
- 11,956
Your delusion has you thinking that you're on a higher moral ground than those you hate. Yet you spend a lot of time on here being anything but kind to people who have differing opinions than you.
Essentially you're no different than the people you hate. You just create a delusion in your head so you can think that what you believe in is morally superior while you simultaneously spew your own version of vitriol and hatred.
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2005
- Messages
- 66,611
- Reaction score
- 38,531
No, it doesn't, and don't think I don't notice how you tried adopting this argument after scrambling to Google in response to the first person slapping you across the face with the truth.
The Washington Post originally went with the headline shown. There was no preceding headline. This is confirmed by archival resources for this obituary. The first snapshot of the headline on October 27, 2019 at 3 o'clock GMT is that. The "terrorist in chief" was never the headline. That's in the final URL address.
Congratulations on doubling down on being the dumbest guy in the room while condescending to everyone else.
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2005
- Messages
- 11,696
- Reaction score
- 18,232
Nope. From the article:
The first version of the Washington Post's headline called Baghdadi "terrorist-in-chief", before it was changed to "austere religious scholar at the helm of Islamic State".
And I really don't care if you think omitting that makes the meme true. I do not. I think when you intentionally leave information out, you are lying. So when you try to pretend that the Washington Post only posted some overly liberal take on al-baghdadi, you are lying.
Concession accepted.
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2006
- Messages
- 7,574
- Reaction score
- 15,251
As usual leftists are celebrating his death.
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2024
- Messages
- 3,388
- Reaction score
- 1,411
He was famous before the crack up of the mono culture. The end.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2010
- Messages
- 14,600
- Reaction score
- 20,786
IIRC he wifed up this chick when he was in his 50s and she was like 28.
Respect, Sir Adams. R.I.P.
Respect, Sir Adams. R.I.P.
Rip.I remember he pulled a young baddie. Well played lad!
