Law School Wouldn’t Let Her Son Opt Out Of Class That Promotes Anti-White Racism. Now She’s Suing

Is nobody going to aknowledge the Elephant in the room? The kid is too stupid to pass whatever grade he/she is in.
 
tibba said:
Yet there are those that do say " all white people are racist ... period " ( grade 6 teacher, to his class ) how about you join me on the fuck racists and racism side rather than arguing about well its only one well , nobody's saying this.. ( word for word they do ) Texas blah blah blah. Join me and fight all forms of racism. Rather than condoning it and twisting and dancing your way to " whites have a more powerful form of racism " historical blah blah.

Racism is wrong. Full stop. It happens to everyone worldwide. Fight it. Or not . Smh
Click to expand...

"Yet there are those that do say " all white people are racist ... period "

And?

This lady seems like a racist, but this doesn't magically do away with the very real societal issues critical race theory outlines. When a society is founded, in large part, upon the backs of a people who even, after being freed have been subject to conditions uniquely poor ever since, it's odd for one side of the aisle to moan about a lone black racist lady while those in power, actually making changes, are white....

It's not the blacks unwilling to talk about these issues, homie.......
 
mkess101 said:
We have charter schools here that are public. Those aren't mutually exclusive...you're saying this is a private school?

Who is "you guys"? Going crazy for school choice? Huh?

I started out by saying this likely is NOT being taught in too many places. For now. There is a groundswell of support by some in our society for this type of attitude. I have no clue if this type of message could or will take hold and become more common. Maybe, maybe not. I'm just responding in this thread to what some kids are evidently being taught.
Click to expand...
The whole point of a charter school is that they have the freedom to teach what and how they want. I'm sure there are conservative publicly funded charter schools as well. That's what the right is demanding right now because of a conspiracy that general public education is leftist indoctrination plotted by the communists.

Forgive me if you aren't in that camp, but your post reads identically to many on this forum who are. Just because you say "yet" doesn't make you look less biased.
 
hillelslovak87 said:
"Yet there are those that do say " all white people are racist ... period "

And?

This lady seems like a racist, but this doesn't magically do away with the very real societal issues critical race theory outlines. When a society is founded, in large part, upon the backs of a people who even, after being freed have been subject to conditions uniquely poor ever since, it's odd for one side of the aisle to moan about a lone black racist lady while those in power, actually making changes, are white....

It's not the blacks unwilling to talk about these issues, homie.......
Click to expand...

And ? Yeah you don't give a shit about racism apart from in the context of your own narrative.

Good to know. Have fun
 
tibba said:
And ? Yeah you don't give a shit about racism apart from in the context of your own narrative.

Good to know. Have fun
Click to expand...

Kid's an ethno-masochist. And an intellectually bankrupt dope. Slimy weasel.
 
hillelslovak87 said:
And yet again, IT'S ONE TEACHER.

You're saying you understand it's one teacher, yet you still scale it out, speaking as if that's a common practice.

There are a lot of people on the left willing to talk, and fabricate proposals pertaining to racial injustices. It's not the left moving along when these conversations can be had......
Click to expand...

Corporations are including this type of thing in their training too. Not as bad because at least it's not kids, but it's more pervasive than you want to admit. Widespread is probably overboard, but this is NOT the only place this is being disseminated. If you honestly think the "POC cannot be racist" trope is ONLY coming from this teacher...you're just way way wrong. I had to go through corporate training that said much of this. Not so much "POC cannot be racist", it didn't say that. It did GO OUT OF ITS WAY though to say that racism by POC toward whites was not viewed the same as vice versa. The power structure being the implicit reason, despite the fact this was information targeted to employees. I work for a private, family owned corporation. The family that owns us is VERY conservative. And they're still putting out training that says "Racism by whites toward POC is far worse than vice versa."

Oddly, sexism was not approached the same way. While men have obviously been atop the power structure and women have been the oppressed when it comes to the workplace...they definitely did not say that sexism by women towards men was looked at differently than vice versa.
 
Slick_36 said:
The whole point of a charter school is that they have the freedom to teach what and how they want. I'm sure there are conservative publicly funded charter schools as well. That's what the right is demanding right now because of a conspiracy that general public education is leftist indoctrination plotted by the communists.

Forgive me if you aren't in that camp, but your post reads identically to many on this forum who are. Just because you say "yet" doesn't make you look less biased.
Click to expand...

Charter schools might have a bit more leeway, but they're still public. They're still taxpayer funded. And more importantly, they still have parameters they have to adhere to. Posting memes that say POC cannot be racist falls far outside those parameters imo. We'll see what the courts say I guess.

And yes, YET. That's not to say I think it's a given fact that this type of information will spread and become commonplace. I don't have a crystal ball. The fact that even one teacher thought it acceptable warrants keeping an eye on. For now, that's all. We'll see if it gets legs, or if it gets nipped in the bud.

I don't know what my bias would be on this...that I don't want a teacher telling students that one type of racism doesn't exist or is insignificant? Yeah, guilty of bias then I suppose.
 
mkess101 said:
Charter schools might have a bit more leeway, but they're still public. They're still taxpayer funded. And more importantly, they still have parameters they have to adhere to. Posting memes that say POC cannot be racist falls far outside those parameters imo. We'll see what the courts say I guess.

And yes, YET. That's not to say I think it's a given fact that this type of information will spread and become commonplace. I don't have a crystal ball. The fact that even one teacher thought it acceptable warrants keeping an eye on. For now, that's all. We'll see if it gets legs, or if it gets nipped in the bud.

I don't know what my bias would be on this...that I don't want a teacher telling students that one type of racism doesn't exist or is insignificant? Yeah, guilty of bias then I suppose.
Click to expand...
This distinction between public and private when we're talking about charter schools is pointless. That freedom is the whole point of them. Unless you're implying that the government is purposely pushing this and funding it, it's irrelevant how they're funded.
 
Slick_36 said:
This distinction between public and private when we're talking about charter schools is pointless. That freedom is the whole point of them. Unless you're implying that the government is purposely pushing this and funding it, it's irrelevant how they're funded.
Click to expand...

Fair enough on funding, but it's still not freedom without limitations. The argument can't be "Well, she did say one type of racism is fine because it doesn't really exist but that's okay because...it's a charter school! She can teach whatever the hell she wants!"
 
tibba said:
You are only concerned about certain forms of racism. Racism is the problem not who's doing it to who. Other racism gets a well may be or and?

Have a nice day .
Click to expand...

It's crazy how I never so much as imply what you're accusing me of thinking, called the lady a racist, and yet still, fabricating a narrative within your dome.

You guys never care to explain how CRT is actually racist, so you retreat to anecdote in some sort of Ben Shapiro argument from disgust.
 
hillelslovak87 said:
It's crazy how I never so much as imply what you're accusing me of thinking, called the lady a racist, and yet still, fabricating a narrative within your dome.

You guys never care to explain how CRT is actually racist, so you retreat to anecdote in some sort of Ben Shapiro argument from disgust.
Click to expand...

Dude just stop. Its a pointless discussion. Have a nice day
 
hillelslovak87 said:
It would have been nice if you were actually willing to have a conversation about CRT, which is the point of this thread.......
Click to expand...

The point of the thread is discussion on a teacher cramming in some objectionable and probably racist materials into her curriculum under the guise of only teaching anti-systemic racism.

If you want a more general discussion on CRT or systemic racism, nothing wrong with that at all but that was not the point of this thread.
 
hillelslovak87 said:
It would have been nice if you were actually willing to have a conversation about CRT, which is the point of this thread.......
Click to expand...

Kind off addressed that in another post. But in layman's terms ascribing any " race " especially by such pathetic markers as such as white or black , literally pigment will only create more racism. Thats where this all white are racist, only whites can be racist comes from.

Ascribing anyone anything based on peoples percieved pigmentation will only have the effect of more division. It will create far more racists. If you think some kids being taught they're inherently racist due to their skin color won't create some ugly racists , I think that's naive.

Where do you draw the line? If there's teachers out there teaching all whites are racist you'll end up eventually with actual racists teaching all blacks have a predisposition towards being violent. CRT creates the framework that can be used in some ugly ugly ways. Oh its just historical and financial context yada yada.

I despise racism and I don't like CRT because it creates a framework where true racism can exist.
 
mkess101 said:
The point of the thread is discussion on a teacher cramming in some objectionable and probably racist materials into her curriculum under the guise of only teaching anti-systemic racism.

If you want a more general discussion on CRT or systemic racism, nothing wrong with that at all but that was not the point of this thread.
Click to expand...

When people are talking about "You want to teach people that one race is super bad and blacks are awesome!!" like many are doing, it's quite obvious this has a direct connection to critical race theory, a conservative bugaboo never even explained coherently in opposition of.

And to think, I agree with a biracial kid suing a school into forcing him into making any declarations of his "blackness" or "whiteness". Guess I can't doubt the veracity of the story, given the sources...........
 
tibba said:
Kind off addressed that in another post. But in layman's terms ascribing any " race " especially by such pathetic markers as such as white or black , literally pigment will only create more racism. Thats where this all white are racist, only whites can be racist comes from.

Ascribing anyone anything based on peoples percieved pigmentation will only have the effect of more division. It will create far more racists. If you think some kids being taught they're inherently racist due to their skin color won't create some ugly racists , I think that's naive.

Where do you draw the line? If there's teachers out there teaching all whites are racist you'll end up eventually with actual racists teaching all blacks have a predisposition towards being violent. CRT creates the framework that can be used in some ugly ugly ways. Oh its just historical and financial context yada yada.

I despise racism and I don't like CRT because it creates a framework where true racism can exist.
Click to expand...

Ah, so your position is that CAN means WILL. So, we might as well just scrap CRT completely since a nutjob could do harm with it. Much sense.

It's weird how recognizing the real disparities between black and white, the only category convention we have given our nation's history and culture, that's the problem because it's racist. Unlike not teaching people about these issues at all, and just letting things get worse and worse.

It's also nuts how you're pushing this odd fabrication about pigmentation, like that's what CRT is actually about. Weird, like these academics are sitting around playing a game of duck duck racist white......
 
hillelslovak87 said:
Ah, so your position is that CAN means WILL. So, we might as well just scrap CRT completely since a nutjob could do harm with it. Much sense.

It's weird how recognizing the real disparities between black and white, the only category convention we have given our nation's history and culture, that's the problem because it's racist. Unlike not teaching people about these issues at all, and just letting things get worse and worse.

It's also nuts how you're pushing this odd fabrication about pigmentation, like that's what CRT is actually about. Weird, like these academics are sitting around playing a game of duck duck racist white......
Click to expand...

And this is why it was a pointless discussion. Thanks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,101
Messages
57,968,153
Members
175,884
Latest member
cloudfair

Share this page

Back
Top