- Joined
- May 14, 2017
- Messages
- 18,417
- Reaction score
- 8,383
I disagree. The presence of a firearm makes the emotional and impulsive behaviors of individuals easu to act on to a catastrophic degree. And the irresponsibility of individuals in caring for their guns allows for the impulsive nature of others. There is no excuse for owning a deadly weapon, especially in the presence of troubled children, and not keeping it secured and out of their ability to access. While guns in of themselves aren't the problem, the fact that anyone can easily access such a dangerous tool with no education on how to handle them is a problem.The notion that guns are more dangerous than protective to an individual is misguided, for a number of reasons:
1) People are individuals not monoliths. The fact that some people commit suicide with a gun, doesn't mean that a gun presents any suicide risk at all to someone who is not of the small minority.
2) Recency bias.. if one looks at the current events of the last few years, than it would seem that a gun is not needed for protection, and that random gun crime presents a far greater danger. However, if one takes a more thorough look at history, the numbers of people murdered during massive civil unrest, or under the control of a tyrannical authority are FAR greater. An armed populous keeps these dangers at bay. When tyrants come to power it's typical to see 20% or more of the population decimated, in the US that would mean 70,000,000 dead, or 3500 years of gun homicide.
An armed populous IN THEORY is a good thing. But when that populous is greatly divided, turned against each other, and are told that anyone who isn't on their side wants to ruin their lives...it only leads to more violence.
And for the record, I am not anti gun. I am pro gun education. If we're going to arm the populous, we need to ensure they are educated on how to be a good owner