• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Law Same sex marriage under review?

The fact it's recognised as a religious thing is bonkers anyway, right?
Not really. It is what it is, and has the roots it does. The real bonkers thing is the government getting involved and framing some "legalization" around two people tying the knot, and offering certain benefits for such a thing, that can push and pull it in either direction at any time. It's complicated though, because without them getting involved, gay marriage would've never been recognized. Now they are reliant on the government to uphold it, and the church is reliant on them to denounce it.

Overall the relationship of church and state is the bonkers thing, but it's what we've collectively accepted for many reasons. The government is a bit of a "frienamy" to both sides.
 
the government should not be involved in the marriage thing at all. why should they have a say.

Well, they could always leave it up to the Church...

I mean, government was kind of needed to step in and recognize them as equal. It's a tenuous relationship, but without it, they ain't even close to having their unions(and all the benefits that come with it) being recognized at all.
I don’t see how they can get out of it. Laws about estates and dividing of assets, medical power of attorney…hell, the government issues marriage licenses. They kind of need to have a say on these issues, but as long as the states are in the marriage law business then it seems clear that the SCOTUS decision is the correct one.
 
Not really. It is what it is, and has the roots it does. The real bonkers thing is the government getting involved and framing some "legalization" around two people tying the knot, and offering certain benefits for such a thing, that can push and pull it in either direction at any time. It's complicated though, because without them getting involved, gay marriage would've never been recognized. Now they are reliant on the government to uphold it, and the church is reliant on them to denounce it.

Overall the relationship of church and state is the bonkers thing, but it's what we've collectively accepted for many reasons. The government is a bit of a "frienamy" to both sides.
It's archaic and draconian.
 
Always, they're the most hateful and ignorant people, yet they're the most depraved and predatory and are all about sex crimes. They're fucked in the head.
Curtain twitching busy bodies. How does it affect you who gets married?
 
It’s strange when animals get brought into it…always by “traditionalists” too. 🤔
Well, how do you get more traditional than barnyard animals?

lol traditionalist. I hope you don't mean me.
 
Well, how do you get more traditional than barnyard animals?

lol traditionalist. I hope you don't mean me.
I wouldn’t claim to know your level of orthodoxy my brother.
 
True love is woke. Just marry a woman and use Grindr when you’re on business trips like Mike Johnson.
Right @Koro_11?

tenor.gif
 
I'm sure Obergefell will be overturned, and I'm sure all the MAGA swine pretending they're cool with gay marriage now will celebrate it. What I'm actually interested in seeing, however, is how the queer "pick-me" MAGAts deal with it. I'm sure they'll find some way to justify it (because they're scum), but it'll be fun watching then scramble for a bit.
 
I'm sure Obergefell will be overturned, and I'm sure all the MAGA swine pretending they're cool with gay marriage now will celebrate it. What I'm actually interested in seeing, however, is how the queer "pick-me" MAGAts deal with it. I'm sure they'll find some way to justify it (because they're scum), but it'll be fun watching then scramble for a bit.
I know Clarence has a ton of clout but how do you reckon they will spin this? There was a leak a few days before Rowe. I wonder if the same.
 
One man
One woman


Edit: libtards don’t get a say as they don’t know the difference
 
Back
Top