I read the unabbridge interview. Ryan said the guard was not an optimal strategy and indicated that bjj my evolve beyond it to some degree where take downs and top game dominate.
My point was the guard is a central part of many top bjj players game. People when world championships with a guard centric strategy. Also of the 3 guys you list 2 are known primarily for their guards and Roger Gracie is arguably the best closed guard player in the game.
You can win with a take down and top game strategy, both Riberio brothers employ this style, but by the same token you can win with a guard centric strategy.
I just don't see the evidence to back up the claims made by Ryan BJJ does evolve, but I believe there is more evidence to support a more varied guard games than a mass movement to a take down and top game style.
Also I am not trying to say that Ryan is not good, but he only has one high level noteworthy accomplishment which is his ADCC finish. Accomplishments at purple belt are to be commended, but they don't make you an elite player. Until he proves himself more I just find it odd that people would fundamentally change their views on BJJ based on anything he says.
Are we talking strictly grappling or are we talking MMA too?
1st I agree with Ryan. I have kept quiet to this point b/c I have some "enemies" so to speak on this board and had I started this thread it wouldhave been shut down pretty quick.
I digress....
Ryan Hall is a famous, elite competitor. He has been out there doing this against the best there are. He is entitled to his opinion.
But even without his opinion the trend was slowly coming anyway.
I knew it would surface 1st in MMA. WHY? Well in MMA the punishment for NOT sweeping or submitting at the very least a loss in a judges decision and at worse a serious beat down.
What the guard has is a technical advantage due to training in that position. That technical advantage has been countered by others own technical advantages AND the inherent mechanical advantage that being on top provides.
Well in grappling only the punishment for being on bottom is not as severe. Worst case scenario, you lose by points or sub,,your teeth stay in tact, usually.
However, as Ryan pointed out the technical advantage of his guard game is starting to be neutralized by his opponents strong technical top game AND leverage based on gravity.
When things start to even out and technique begins to arrive close to the same level the mechanical advantages of the top player start to show themselves.
You provided several good examples of guard players and I am sure that there will continue to be great guard players winning in grappling. But that does not mean that Ryan is wrong, there is an inherent advantage to being a good grappler and being on top.
Please note I prefaced that last comment by stating you have to be a good grappler 1st, be on top 2nd. Being a good grappler would INCLUDE having a good guard game and INCLUDE being able to stifle the guard. It would INCLUDE having a good top game and yes ladies and gentlemen it would include having a good takedown and takedown defense game.