I don't give a heck about Khabilov (haven't even seen him fight until I saw this thread), but anyone using media scores as a means of "challenging" the validity of the official decision is a retard. You know what's the difference between the opinion of a MMA media outlet and a random sherdogger or a random MMA fan in general? The media outlet has a bigger platform to proclaim their opinion from, that's it. Neither the media outlet, nor the random fan are actually accountable for their judging, while official decisions can be challenged and overturned. Neither the media outlet nor the random fan are beholden to a strict set of scoring criteria like the ringside judges are, meaning that they can give out decisions based on personal bias and will suffer no repercussions for "scoring" fights that way. Heck, most of the time the media or fans don't even know the scoring criteria properly, lmao. Subjective biased opinions do not gain additional value simply because they are proclaimed from a bigger platform, like an entire site instead of a single forum post.
When some dumbfuck challenges an official decision (especially an unanimous one, lmao) by posting a list of "media scores", it's enough to present an equal number of random MMA fan opinions to counter it. You know why? Because the media scores and fan opinions are equivalent in their value, or, in other words, they're equally fucking worthless.