- Joined
- Oct 6, 2004
- Messages
- 43,704
- Reaction score
- 14,613
It's primarily about the attention given and the framing. The reporting on the vast majority of "culture warrior" issues in the US revolves around anecdotal stories which are lightning rod issues for the narrative they are trying to amplify. Identity politics in particular is always like that, and not just in the US. "This identity group has this problem and that identity group is to blame, this story characterises the issue".Because these topics can be used to advantages for nefarious groups doesn't make them invalid imo. Maybe I give people too much credit but as a hypothetical, if someone hears the sentence "white Americans jobs are being taken" I think they then believe whomever is presenting that information has devalued the weight of their opinion and should be trusted less... For various reasons, but not because white people are concerned their jobs are being taken...
And we see these exact tactics used by TV media, so when consuming "news" we get propaganda from every angle. What percent of the population is incapable of recognizing propaganda? We'd all do better to log off "social media" and turn off the TV.
It's not that the majority of the anecdotes won't be things that have happened, just that the details and presentation will be "massaged" to amplify the victimisation narrative.
In this case they are specifically looking to amplify White Identity politics, stories representative of people of color, immigrants, "perverts", and the disabled being "privileged" over or victimising, middle and lower class white Americans. For the purpose of leveraging America's polarisation and removing their ability or interest in American actions on the global stage, and because they believe it's more likely to lead to a Republican/Trump victory and less opposition (or less effective opposition) to their agenda and global interests.
It's interesting to see how instead of the decentralisation of information making propaganda campaigns harder or less effective, it's actually enabled it simply with volume, the "firehose of falsehood" and the propagation of echo chambers. Especially since digital literacy rates/performance aren't great, and people generally aren't motivated to critically evaluate or fact check things they agree with.