International Russia/Ukraine Megathread V9

[SandisLL]

Kremlin btw already had scheduled " referendums " in these 2 areas controlled by pro kremlin oriented " republics " in Georgia. To incorporate them in Russian Federation.

However then sanctions had been increased with next package and deNazification small special operation in Ukraine didn't went enough fast ......

 

[SandisLL]

One thing that a lot of analytics didn't had predicted was that they will attack Kiev from Belarus....

Due to old fowchart like in 2014 th because then Belarus didn't had sanctions.
From economic point of wiev for Russia today had been easier if they just had attacked Ukr from Crimea and Russia's territory ...
Then Belarus today had 0 sanctions and Lukashenko is best Kremlin's friend.

 

[GhostZ06]

 

[GhostZ06]

 

[Strychnine]

 

[Queen B]

People says Russia isnt crazy enough to launch nukes. I say otherwise. They have no issues inflicting pain on their own people, history didnt changed much.

Also I wonder what Lavrov means by saying world will get Russia attention on Feb 24?

 

[Queen B]

 

[Strychnine]

North Korea's famine at worst in more than 30 years - report - The Jerusalem Post (jpost.com)

Is North Korea quietly grappling with a COVID resurgence? (msn.com)

I wouldn't be surprised if some of them make a break for it. N.K. is being gripped by another extreme famine right now along with some kind of respiratory ailment going around Pyongyang.

 

[DEVILsSON]

People says Russia isnt crazy enough to launch nukes. I say otherwise. They have no issues inflicting pain on their own people, history didnt changed much.

Also I wonder what Lavrov means by saying world will get Russia attention on Feb 24?

That's bs. While Russian people can get used to daily sodomy, that's not the problem. The problem is that NATO will conventionally obliterate Russia. At the very least all Russian assets will be destroyed outside its borders. Another more aggressive plan is that Russia will be seen as completely unstable and NATO may move on Russia. Maybe Russia is able to launch a few nukes maybe not. It's not a pleasant scenario but if Russia is seen as unstable regime run by a lunatic, it will become a practical solution/approach. Putin knows all this so he will not use nukes no matter how much he bluffs or has his lapdogs and pundits do likewise or worse with their rhetoric. Medvedev and others can say it daily. Like I said before, they all put themselves in the corner. Either use the nukes or stfu. Except using nukes is the end of the Russian regime. China will not stand by Russia. India will not stand by Russia.

We live in a weird time where anyone 'smart' is qualified to analyse absolutely anything according to some.

The fuck does Russell Brand know about war or international politics?

It's literally embarrassing where people source their bullshit from.

But Brand is famous and his politics are different from my own and yet somehow we agree completely so what he is saying must be sensible and correct!!! Common bro trust me!

Flawless logic by Kremlin parrots.

 

[Cole train]

 

[Hog-train]

Will this possibly cause South Korea to respond with arms aid?

 

[Vergilius]

Detailed analysis of the tactical situation in Bakhmut. We are seeing a slow, attritional grinding sort of war. Some analysts are speculating that we might not see a return to manouver warfare for many months yet (if at all). However, it is a common mistake to try to deduce the future of a war from the state it is currently in: if this video is correct, for example, in its thesis that Russia is overcommitting its forces to Bakhmut and will end up exhausted and in need of a break (after potentially taking the city), then that could potentially create a situation where Ukraine can counter attack succesfully and rapidly with fresh troops and new equipment... but it's all speculation at this point.

 

[San Marino]

People says Russia isn't crazy enough to launch nukes. I say otherwise. They have no issues inflicting pain on their own people, history didn't change much.

Ah, there won't be a Russia left.
There may not be a US left either.
All because of Ukraine? I don't think so.
"Better to lose an arm or a leg than to lose your life."

 

[Ruthless Ryan]

Ah, there won't be a Russia left.
There may not be a US left either.
All because of Ukraine? I don't think so.
"Better to lose an arm or a leg than to lose your life."

Well, I would assume the US and Nato have to take his saber rattling serious as launching nuclear bombs all over europe and US is a big deal. And if he managed to get one off that would be more then enough excuse to solve the Russia problem that doesnt appear to be going away anytime soon.

 

[Rholk]

Ah, there won't be a Russia left.
There may not be a US left either.
All because of Ukraine? I don't think so.
"Better to lose an arm or a leg than to lose your life."

They were given an arm in 2008, a leg in 2014.
I'm sure if you give up another arm they'll stop this time.

 

[Rod1]

Russia: "We won't stop at Ukraine"

Russian trolls: "maybe we can try a diplomatic solution".


https://sot.com.al/english/bota/rus...jesoj-si-ukraina-japim-gjithcka-per-t-i533879

 

[AWilder]

<45>

 

[Queen B]

<45>

Bunker Boy would tell Zelenskyy to give up the land?

 

[pinger]

<45>

He is such a fucking idiot.

 

[Terry Noonan]

<45>

I believe him