Well if france had conscription service then things would be different but thats not reality now
Dont know about leadership or training since havent served in either but heard ukr had fairly good system before this shitshow thanks to us/nato training staff there, problem for ukr is gear really which france is ahead by far. You are correct about west keeping ukr floating
Btw one month of training is nothing you should know this if you served. Its bare basics,
Conscription service isn't true backbone in military.
It is always pros. Even in countries like Russia or China....
And next layer is people deeply interested in military so far that they are willing for free do training while they are working in civilian life and paying tax.
Such stuff is in some countries called as National Guard.
Only really small % from ppl in National guards are paid for participating.
National Guard idea is voluntary service for homeland for free. While working somewhere and ofc paying tax.
In best case these are ppl - backbone as fundament for their country. Core.
Then next stuff are special units and here I don't mean riot control pavians.
Anti terrorism units, special units for criminal police and security service under gov...
Border guards - pros......
Custom inspectors - pros....
Only after this are conscripts.........
Ofc it is good that country does have a lot of trained guys.... to some extent.
While someone still should operate tanks, self propelled hotwizers and MRLS launchers....
SAM systems etc.....
Even in USSR they assesed what kind of civil speciality you had before assigned somewhere.
For example someone after 4 years trade school in field where he is usable for military.
Military always needs some specialists and if for free even well trained beginner is good solution...
Especially if to bear in mind that trade schools and engineering diplomas were after mando practical work in field...