International Russia/Ukraine Megathread V7

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cid said:
Wait are you serious?
Click to expand...

Damn bro, you can't even answer basic questions like "what hard evidence do you have?" What motive does any leader of any country have to start a nuclear war? It would lead to complete and total self annihilation, the exact opposite of what their interests are.
 
tibba said:
Sadly it's pretty obvious. No offence Strychnine but you defended ghost because you said it was his opinion not a source. Yet ghost himself tried to claim he posted a source.. ( he lied ) but still claimed he posted a legitimate source. Somehow no warning. No public call out . Nothing. Different strokes for different folks shrug.

I still like ya though lol
Click to expand...

He was warned, it's just hiding way back on page 185 with pebs source for 500k foreign fighters and rationalposters source on thermobarics being fired into residential areas
 
Fashionisdanger said:
Do you think the Red Baron would've done interviews like that? Jesus Christ.
Click to expand...

The Red Baron would have been all over traditional media AND social media. He wrote a mass-produced autobiography about shooting down English aircraft AND painted his plane bright red for attention. He would have loved this era.
 
In 2018, Trump warned Germany that they will become dependent on Russia for energy and the German politicians openly laughed:


I wonder if they are still laughing...
 
F35 pilot turned on its transponder to let people see that it's responding to Russian aggression near snake island. Likely others where involved.

 
Son of Jamin said:
In 2018, Trump warned Germany that they will become dependent on Russia for energy and the German politicians openly laughed:


I wonder if they are still laughing...
Click to expand...

That's because Angela Merkel being tied to Putin’s hip. Her staff was a ship of fools.
 
KeepingItReal said:
Damn bro, you can't even answer basic questions like "what hard evidence do you have?" What motive does any leader of any country have to start a nuclear war? It would lead to complete and total self annihilation, the exact opposite of what their interests are.
Click to expand...

Well you have just added more questions...

As to the evidence of the general threat to human life there's a whole bunch here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_winter#General_references



As to your theoretical question to the motives when Mutually Assured Destruction exists is that MAD is a possibility.

You claim that it is an inevitability.

Can you prove that?

What if the first nuclear strike is conducted miles in the sky?
What if it's in an incredibly lowly populated area?

Government run simulations on possible outcomes if a nuke is dropped. It's considered an important thing for some people. It doesn't always lead to massive escalation by both sides.

Turns out that there is a lot of thought that goes into the process of deciding whether a 500 odd nuclear missile retaliation is the appropriate response to a nuclear attack.

Aerial escalation is the most commonly accepted likely course of the initial phases of a nuclear war. A superpower, likely Russia launches a nuclear strike well above a low populated area in a show of force and deterrent. In most scenarios America returns a singular aerial nuclear device of its own.

From there it quickly shifts into hasty talks to avert nuclear war or nuclear escalation. Mainly nuclear escalation.
 
Son of Jamin said:
In 2018, Trump warned Germany that they will become dependent on Russia for energy and the German politicians openly laughed:


I wonder if they are still laughing...
Click to expand...


Actually for example warnings in europe that natural gas in future will be expensive....were since 2007 th!
More than this......
When they 2008-2011-2012 psyched anti nuclear campaign to close NPPs....
They had been warned by multiple analytics, economists and energetic field analytics.....that cos this ....electricity will be more expensive!
That usage of natural gas to produce electricity will boost up demand for natural gas and cos this....natural gas prices will increase!

___
2007-2020 they didn't listened anything.

Even launched Nord Stream I and invested in Nord Stream II...!!!

Waked up only in autumn of 2021 th!
When saw actual current market prices for natural gas!
 
Cid said:
Well you have just added more questions...

As to the evidence of the general threat to human life there's a whole bunch here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_winter#General_references



As to your theoretical question to the motives when Mutually Assured Destruction exists is that MAD is a possibility.

You claim that it is an inevitability.

Can you prove that?

What if the first nuclear strike is conducted miles in the sky?
What if it's in an incredibly lowly populated area?

Government run simulations on possible outcomes if a nuke is dropped. It's considered an important thing for some people. It doesn't always lead to massive escalation by both sides.

Turns out that there is a lot of thought that goes into the process of deciding whether a 500 odd nuclear missile retaliation is the appropriate response to a nuclear attack.

Aerial escalation is the most commonly accepted likely course of the initial phases of a nuclear war. A superpower, likely Russia launches a nuclear strike well above a low populated area in a show of force and deterrent. In most scenarios America returns a singular aerial nuclear device of its own.

From there it quickly shifts into hasty talks to avert nuclear war or nuclear escalation. Mainly nuclear escalation.
Click to expand...

Yes more questions but they are only the outcrop of the first question. However complicated the scenarios are, yet it's exactly the fear of being destroyed by other nuclear powers that stops a nuclear power from using said power. This scenario where Russia uses nukes as a deterrent sounds like total BS because they have other weapons they can use as deterrents.
 
Zinger said:
Guys who have access to Russian combat videos, info about the war and stuff like that, can you suggest some telegram groups where to check those out?
Click to expand...

Just keep checking combatfootage section on reddit most stuff come there anyway in time.
 
Yeah ....
Because red carpet rule for them....
They need to have normal rooms etc + all utilities etc bills covered...

They aren't locals so does have MORE rights than locals btw....

__
Riga and it's area already had >33000 residents with Ukr origin with different passports before this shit started ..
+ enough legal immigrants ( these who are working or doing business or are students ) from different countries...
+ now...refugees from Ukraine to add here . ..
 
KeepingItReal said:
Yes more questions but they are only the outcrop of the first question. However complicated the scenarios are, yet it's exactly the fear of being destroyed by other nuclear powers that stops a nuclear power from using said power. This scenario where Russia uses nukes as a deterrent sounds like total BS because they have other weapons they can use as deterrents.
Click to expand...

The fear of being destroyed by other nuclear powers is also likely the motive to pre-eminent strike.

If you want any hope of surviving the impending holocaust it pays to go first.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

LeonardoBjj
International Global aviation council finds Russia responsible for downing MH17 over Ukraine in 2014
Replies
4
Views
182
nixkid
N

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,211
Messages
57,974,918
Members
175,889
Latest member
MEthzale

Share this page

Back
Top