Russia/Ukraine Megathread V6

[GhostZ06]

Russians destroying a S-300 system used by the UA

 

[ViD]

Pentagon also confirmed there’s no reports of Russia pulling in any additional troops, not calling for foreign volunteers, not calling for Belarus troops. If things were so bad for them, surely they would start bringing more troops?

 

[GhostZ06]

How is this possible? All this is in direct conflict with @Da Speeit . INB4 NATO official is fake news.

Since the fall of the soviet union they basically threw all theyre knowledge of warfare down the toilet. Make no mistake, the soviets union military was far more battle hardened an then what we are seeing today.

Putin must have really fucked the officer core

 

[Da Speeit]

Yes, but you're the one responding to others when any discussion is being had, with contrarian views without really adding anything except "we don't know!" while using Russian talking points. Like "Hey, Ukraine is being invaded, and people are dying, but did you know about Zelenksyy's corruption?" as if that's relevant justification.

I'm sure it will be quite awhile before any realistic, verifiable numbers from this invasion/war come out. But it's painfully obvious what your agenda is, regardless of how neutral you say you are.

I'm responding to everyone who is sticking their chest out saying "So what we know is..." when no one has any fucking clue, in order to spin their own narrative, which proves to be more and more false as the days go on.
It's apparent at this point that Putin doesn't want Kiev, and people keep hammering it home and won't move off it or consider anything else.

I don't have an agenda other than discussing the truth. Some of you hate hearing it.
Zelensky's corruption is very relevant. The Azov is relevant. Everything is relevant. The mud in the north is relevant. Everything in war in relevant. You guys just consume this Disney version of the topic and get hostile when people expose you to facts and ideas outside of your bubble.

You, for instance, have no fucking clue what you're talking about and are in here correcting people about things like the spelling of Kyyiv (which you misspelled) and attribute people spelling it differently as Russian-Backed motives. Do you comprehend how stupid and childish that is? If you brought that up in a normal conversation, not on the internet, with a human adult, they would look at you like you're out of your mind or have the emotional maturity of a child.
And you have the gall to talk about the "Relevancy" of what the rest of us are discussing.

You can leave again.

 

[Da Speeit]

Where has Ukraine said they shot down HUNDREDS of planes?

God, you truly have no clue what you're talking about

Spoiler

 

[GhostZ06]

Pentagon also confirmed there’s no reports of Russia pulling in any additional troops, not calling for foreign volunteers, not calling for Belarus troops. If things were so bad for them, surely they would start bringing more troops?

They should, but only thing i heard is they made a deal with a merc group in Libya and i saw a video of more Chechen fights arriving

 

[GhostZ06]

God, you truly have no clue what you're talking about

Spoiler

eh? i dont know about that lol. I need to see nato/DoD sources

 

[Da Speeit]

How is this possible? All this is in direct conflict with @Da Speeit . INB4 NATO official is fake news.

NATO are not a reliable source. Sorry. Hate to break it to you.

 

[b34stmode]

Pentagon also confirmed there’s no reports of Russia pulling in any additional troops, not calling for foreign volunteers, not calling for Belarus troops. If things were so bad for them, surely they would start bringing more troops?

Where did Pentagon confirm this?

 

[Da Speeit]

eh? i dont know about that lol. I need to see nato/DoD sources

KI is completely full of shit, obviously, but that poster was saying they were and @b34stmode can't believe anyone who isn't Russian would lie

 

[b34stmode]

God, you truly have no clue what you're talking about

Spoiler

You do realize "hundreds" refers to multiples of 100, right? Let me know when that number hits 200 or 300.

 

[The Diplomat]

I'm responding to everyone who is sticking their chest out saying "So what we know is..." when no one has any fucking clue, in order to spin their own narrative, which proves to be more and more false as the days go on.
It's apparent at this point that Putin doesn't want Kiev, and people keep hammering it home and won't move off it or consider anything else.

I don't have an agenda other than discussing the truth. Some of you hate hearing it.
Zelensky's corruption is very relevant. The Azov is relevant. Everything is relevant. The mud in the north is relevant. Everything in war in relevant. You guys just consume this Disney version of the topic and get hostile when people expose you to facts and ideas outside of your bubble.

You, for instance, have no fucking clue what you're talking about and are in here correcting people about things like the spelling of Kyyiv (which you misspelled) and attribute people spelling it differently as Russian-Backed motives. Do you comprehend how stupid and childish that is? If you brought that up in a normal conversation, not on the internet, with a human adult, they would look at you like you're out of your mind or have the emotional maturity of a child.
And you have the gall to talk about the "Relevancy" of what the rest of us are discussing.

You can leave again.

More goalposting. As if KyivNotKiev was my idea, or that that's all I've said in this thread.

And nah, I think I'll stay. Maybe relax a bit, put my feet up for awhile. Whatever your schtick is, however wrong, it's still entertaining.

God, you truly have no clue what you're talking about

Spoiler

Kyiv Indepedent?! More like Kyyiveiv Independent, amirite?

 

[ViD]

Where did Pentagon confirm this?

There was an article posted in the previous thread

 

[b34stmode]

Since the fall of the soviet union they basically threw all theyre knowledge of warfare down the toilet. Make no mistake, the soviets union military was far more battle hardened an then what we are seeing today.

Putin must have really fucked the officer core

It's crazy to think that Russia doesn't have NCO's, from everything I know NCO's are a MUST have to be effective on the battlefield when you are talking about tens of thousands of troops.

 

[USA!USA!]

Big yikes if any of that is even remotely true.

 

[b34stmode]

There was an article posted in the previous thread

You are mistaken, sorry. Everything is reporting to Russia bringing in mercanary's from Syria.

Ukraine war: Why is Russia encouraging foreign fighters to join? | Russia-Ukraine war News | Al Jazeera

On March 11, Russian President Vladimir Putin threw his support behind a plan to recruit what he characterised as eager foreign volunteer fighters to join his forces in Ukraine and “help the people who live in the Donbas”.

Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu said 16,000 troops were ready to assist Russia in combat, which came as unfavourable news for Ukrainians.

 

[Da Speeit]

NATO is not reliable at all

https://web.archive.org/web/2022032...n-ukraine-nato-estimates-xyZjWxinMDHzdeRZvAeD

NATO says that up to 40,000 Russian troops have been killed, wounded, taken prisoner or are missing in Ukraine, said a senior military official from the alliance.

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization calculates the figure based on information provided by Ukrainian authorities and information obtained from Russia – both officially and unintentionally, the official said.

NATO estimates that between 7,000 and 15,000 Russian soldiers have been killed since the invasion began on Feb. 24. Using statistical averages from past conflicts that for every casualty roughly three soldiers are wounded, NATO analysts reach their total figure.

Russia began its invasion with roughly 190,000 troops. It has since brought in additional troops from Chechnya, Syria and other locations.

their new number is 40,000 casualties/captured/missing
They're full of shit.

Their out will be that "Missing" means "we don't know their whereabouts" which means they could be moving in areas with low intel. 40,000 losses is insane to claim. We're in the first real social media war and you guys are falling for it.

 

[Da Speeit]

Big yikes if any of that is even remotely true.

See my previous post.
Here's a good article that represents reality and not the spewing of propaganda you're going to see all day every day. I'm gonna keep pumping it
https://www.newsweek.com/putins-bombers-could-devastate-ukraine-hes-holding-back-heres-why-1690494

 

[Cole train]

NATO is not reliable at all

https://web.archive.org/web/2022032...n-ukraine-nato-estimates-xyZjWxinMDHzdeRZvAeD


their new number is 40,000 casualties/captured/missing
They're full of shit.

Their out will be that "Missing" means "we don't know their whereabouts" which means they could be moving in areas with low intel. 40,000 losses is insane to claim. We're in the first real social media war and you guys are falling for it.

Nah Armenia azerbaijan was first

Just didn't get that much hype as this one

(Armenia managed to fool everyone that things were going good when they were being slaugtered)

 

[ViD]

You are mistaken, sorry. Everything is reporting to Russia bringing in mercanary's from Syria.

Ukraine war: Why is Russia encouraging foreign fighters to join? | Russia-Ukraine war News | Al Jazeera

On March 11, Russian President Vladimir Putin threw his support behind a plan to recruit what he characterised as eager foreign volunteer fighters to join his forces in Ukraine and “help the people who live in the Donbas”.

Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu said 16,000 troops were ready to assist Russia in combat, which came as unfavourable news for Ukrainians.

This doesn’t mean anything yet, no new troops have been pulled in according to Pentagon