D
Deleted member 555403
Guest
The world has changed greatly since the 1930s, most notably with the nuclear weapon. It's why the run up to '14 and the armament since is so fucked up. Ultimately the end is the same, you have to sit down with the world's other nuclear superpower. The cost analysis from the west was to make Russia pay if it couldn't westernize Ukraine and have its corporations extract its resources, so now Ukrainians are making the payments in blood.They probably aren't getting any concessions because the point needs to be made that we can't have land grabs like this anymore. It's not the 1930's world anymore and there are plenty of dictators around the world that would love to increase their power at the expense of their neighbors. Dropping sanctions and ceding the land they grabbed in '14 would set a bad precedent and fail to deter future military actions.
America set up a win/win situation. Either they get Ukraine and its resources into the fold, or get to ramp up the MIC, strengthen NATO, and weaken Russia without spilling blood. Putin was facing a lose/lose. Either Ukraine opens up its 14th largest gas reserves to Europe and undercuts Russian energy, or he invades to secure his lot and faces international sanctions. It was a stupid calculus for anyone that values harmony and human life to put that decision in Putin's hands. Unfortunately nation states don't give a shit about any of that, we'll dangle NATO in front of their face like a piece of candy to a child and tell them to get fucked when the rubber hits the road.
also dictator, despot, whatever.. none of that matters without a massive nuclear arsenal. North Korea would get glassed into oblivion if they invaded SKor with their 30ish nukes, because mutually assured destruction is not on the table.
