- Joined
- Jun 9, 2003
- Messages
- 15,860
- Reaction score
- 5,437
Russia but not by much now that US aid has arrived.Who's winning now lads?
From what I've pieced together in my peripheral, most pundits saying Russia via long game? Ukraine has recently received more guarantees on funding and military aid but will it just prolong the same thing?
Where we at and where do you see the end?
West fights with jets and we've sent no western jets being the issue.
This is mainly an artillery war and western countries don't really have artillery capacity or stockpiles outside America (because America) and South Korea (who use artillery heavily in their forces)
SK currently can't send shells to war zones but they back fill some US stockpiles.
Which makes the US aid package an artillery package deal from the two western artillery forces worth a damn in an artillery war.
If US/SK aid flows Ukraine does well, if not they really struggle. Right now it flows but the delays were quite damaging.
Long term is hard to tell, both sides have their issues and there are many different factors.
NK/SK proxy war being a possibility right now... NK has men to die, SK artillery power is insane. Could rival the US as a contributor.
Russia only having 4 dishes to communicate with their satellites and one just got struck because Ukraine made their own deep strike capabilities...
Which now happen almost daily.
Increasing western artillery purchases from non aligned states..
Predicting the twists and turns.. uyyyyy
Biggest factor by far is US passing the next bill. Russia can't long war because they can't match western production except for a few areas. In 2 years stockpiles for stuff starts to get dangerously low.
Last edited: