- Joined
- Mar 30, 2020
- Messages
- 10,663
- Reaction score
- 6,916
6 August 2025
Seems to be... and since the start of the war Kiev have put forward the doctrine of not allowing commanders to pull back and ceding land (that's what a pro ukraine guy said) even when it would give some tactical advantage (like higher ground). They're only allowed when HQ tells them to. So I would expect a siege there while other russian troops keep pushing forward.From what I gather, Ukraine has only a few miles left open before they seriously begin considering pulling out?
Sounds like Ukraine had an idea for holding a few months longer but the Russians actually started thinking and opted to start surrounding the city instead of running in head first…it’s learningSeems to be... and since the start of the war Kiev have put forward the doctrine of not allowing commanders to pull back and ceding land (that's what a pro ukraine guy said) even when it would give some tactical advantage (like higher ground). They're only allowed when HQ tells them to. So I would expect a siege there while other russian troops keep pushing forward.
Trump says he plans to meet with Putin and Zelenski in Ukraine next week. I'm curious about what have been discussed, if they meet in Ukraine it would means one form of cease fire in place. Dude can't risk going in a drone infested place.
Look, I know it seems fair to Ukraine... but you got to understand that it would fastrack the fall of USA financial dominance tenfold.If anything, release the Russian $$$ being held back and give it to Ukraine, and they can pay for the equipment needed. Show trump enough $$$ and he will grant Ukraine any weapon short of a Nuke to purchase and use.
An endless war which Ukraine will lose. Well, they are actually losing now.Seems to be... and since the start of the war Kiev have put forward the doctrine of not allowing commanders to pull back and ceding land (that's what a pro ukraine guy said) even when it would give some tactical advantage (like higher ground). They're only allowed when HQ tells them to. So I would expect a siege there while other russian troops keep pushing forward.
A waste of time. Nothing will change with the exception of a Russian victory.Trump says he plans to meet with Putin and Zelenski in Ukraine next week. I'm curious about what have been discussed, if they meet in Ukraine it would means one form of cease fire in place. Dude can't risk going in a drone infested place.
30-180 days ceasefire means advantage for russia not ukr..and they might had prepare xx false flags actions in order to rush next active phase.
Longer cesefire than 180 days might maybe help a bit for ukr.
IF russia will continue to yell loud etc...
They're cozying up to Brazil too. Brazilian military is heavily pro USA (because soft power and commission in their overpriced weapons buys), so recently some "reports" came up about part of the military being uncomfortable with China sweet talk. The government on the other hand just sent 2 military attachés of general rank to live and negotiate deals there (previously only USA had general rank attachés from Brazil).☆ china is expanding their impact from Serbia and Belarus, some african areas and caucasus, middle east and gulf area, asia and even countries from uzbekistan and kazahstan etc..
If they even managed to sell weapons for Belarus and Serbia , Armenia, Azerbaijan, then ofc there are xx countries not mentioned here....
Ukr in NATO or EU?What would be a fair deal in your opinion? Would you see Ukr in Nato?
There need to be some guarantee for Ukraine, that's for sure. If they don't agree at the very least demiliarized zone just like in Koreas then might as well just give up the whole country. As soon as Trump leaves office Putin will say 'it was a deal with Trump' and will resume attacks. The scourge cannot be trusted.
Demiliarized zone with sentry towers, snipers, heavy minefields and shut borders with Belarus and Scourge might be the most reasonable of solutions if Nato is out of question.
Ya, the reports have been all over the map. there is only a handful of sources I really trust. One of Spins Marino's trusted sources Times now" had a thumbnail saying "war is over".Propaganda sure is funny. Today I saw 5 different videos talking about the Putin-Trump meeting
American Trump biased video: "Putin blinked and that's why they're meeting"
Russia biased video: "Trump blinked and that's why they're meeting"
NATO (UK)biased video: "Putin will come groveling to Trump"
Ukraine biased video: "I think Putin offered something good to Trump and he'll discard Ukraine's interest in this"
American anti Trump video: "Putin will just keep stringing Trump along"
It's going to be a hard deal to make. Zelensky wants to meet with Putler but what is he going to ask for? He'll want Putler to get out but at the same time Puter wants what he has and more and dealing with putler is close to impossibleWhat would be a fair deal in your opinion? Would you see Ukr in Nato?
There need to be some guarantee for Ukraine, that's for sure. If they don't agree at the very least demiliarized zone just like in Koreas then might as well just give up the whole country. As soon as Trump leaves office Putin will say 'it was a deal with Trump' and will resume attacks. The scourge cannot be trusted.
Demiliarized zone with sentry towers, snipers, heavy minefields and shut borders with Belarus and Scourge might be the most reasonable of solutions if Nato is out of question.
Most places I read that Putin ain't meeting Zelensky. He agreed to meet Trump, the idea of Zelensky being there too was brought up later and they didnt agree with that. Zelensky video later about "the key is to ensure they don’t deceive anyone in the details — neither us nor the United States" kind makes me feel that's probably true. Putin probably doesnt want a counter narrative in the meeting.It's going to be a hard deal to make. Zelensky wants to meet with Putler but what is he going to ask for? He'll want Putler to get out but at the same time Puter wants what he has and more and dealing with putler is close to impossible
Most places I read that Putin ain't meeting Zelensky. He agreed to meet Trump, the idea of Zelensky being there too was brought up later and they didnt agree with that. Zelensky video later about "the key is to ensure they don’t deceive anyone in the details — neither us nor the United States" kind makes me feel that's probably true. Putin probably doesnt want a counter narrative in the meeting.
I think the deal will involve Russia getting the oblasts they already took, some form of cease-fire and lifiting of some sanctions on Russia.
The NATO/buffer zone thing that's the catch there, not sure what anyone would be willing to concede. We know that Trump doesnt think long term, so maybe we'll see a buffer deal here? Something that'll be somebody else trouble years down the line.
I mean what they occupied... maybe not the full oblasts?You think Russia will get all 4 oblasts ? they havnt taken Zaporizhzhia and that city has 750,000 people, do you just tell them to vacate for Putler? Lots of people in Kherson also....that will be a non starter for UKR for sure.