I don't think they lost all those men and equipment, during their initial push into Kiev, if they weren't seriously trying to decapitate the government. Even then they might not have annexed the entire country but they'd have de facto control of it by having another puppet in power and the new government could have ceded the land Russia has currently claimed. This land bridge being the very least they'd be willing to take which is still ¼ of the most valuable part of Ukraine.Your PS more strictly the last sentence is a strawman.
If you're referring to the land bridge that was a core goal of the mission it's not "invading the whole country and taking as much of it as they can get". Kharkov Oblast is heavily Russian too and Russia had plans to annex it before the Ukranian offensive. The Ukranian Kharkov offensive is actually what led Russia to officially announce their annexations sort of thing.
If Russia was gunning for the whole country they'd have never withdrawn from the north.
Well, I agree that western world is like you.You just put Global Warming as more important than war and the potential of nuclear war. You did that.
There is reason why Putin in power is good for China and NATO.Russia decided to continue the armor decommissioning program in Avdiivka
![]()
![]()
I don't think they lost all those men and equipment, during their initial push into Kiev, if they weren't seriously trying to decapitate the government. Even then they might not have annexed the entire country but they'd have de facto control of it by having another puppet in power and the new government could have ceded the land Russia has currently claimed. This land bridge being the very least they'd be willing to take which is still ¼ of the most valuable part of Ukraine.
They very obviously were trying to seize the entire countryThey were trying to win the war right away. They were not trying to annex Kiev and land west of the Dneiper. Prussia took Paris they didn't hold Paris, they got French surrender and negotiated a settlement. This is how it typically goes.
So they aren't trying to take all of Ukraine. I'm not disputing what you wrote after sentence 1.
They had year to build fortifications and bunkers, to install minefields and create tunnels underground too. For example two lines of threnches connect with underground tunnel etc like stuff.It basically looks to me like the Russian army is capable enough in defense but cannot (either through ISR or good Ukrainian defenses or lack of material or all three) generate an offensive, at least not this year. With the operational failure of the Ukrainian Black Sea offensive (it failed to sever the land bridge or reach Tokmak) we may be entering the frozen conflict of this war, at least until spring 2024.
It basically looks to me like the Russian army is capable enough in defense but cannot (either through ISR or good Ukrainian defenses or lack of material or all three) generate an offensive, at least not this year. With the operational failure of the Ukrainian Black Sea offensive (it failed to sever the land bridge or reach Tokmak) we may be entering the frozen conflict of this war, at least until spring 2024.
From small short range quadrocopters both sides are using doctored Chinesse mainstream mass production civil drones.so long as western support remains, this is favorable for Ukraine. Ukraine is getting better and better weapons as they deplete and run out of soviet era shit. Russia is getting... sus artillery from NK and low-tech drones from Iran.
Obviously the level of western support (including paying the bills of the Ukr government) will determine a great deal. A lot also depends on the Russian military industry, what it can supply and how fast, and whether they can pump out trained soldiers fast enough. But I think the front will be pretty immobile for awhile.so long as western support remains, this is favorable for Ukraine. Ukraine is getting better and better weapons as they deplete and run out of soviet era shit. Russia is getting... sus artillery from NK and low-tech drones from Iran.
im not expecting significant changes until Ukraine can, hopefully, defend the airspace better. probably wont get a NATO/USA style of air superiority, but if they can expand the lines in the sky they will have much better success with a spring/summer 24 operation.Obviously the level of western support (including paying the bills of the Ukr government) will determine a great deal. A lot also depends on the Russian military industry, what it can supply and how fast, and whether they can pump out trained soldiers fast enough. But I think the front will be pretty immobile for awhile.
They very obviously were trying to seize the entire country
They didn't had get supplies in time.You mean the 40 km long convoy was just a feint? Those pesky Russians always have the best game plans.
Obviously they didn't want to take the whole country, bud. I mean, if they wanted to, they would have, so they clearly didn't want to, because they didn'tYou mean the 40 km long convoy was just a feint? Those pesky Russians always have the best game plans.