The story I was referring to. Milley never fails to disappoint and being wrong. He was actually a good officer in his younger days. The corruption in DC has destroyed the man. Of course, it is IBC Ukraine, so take it with a grain of salt.
.
Ukraine already liberated over half of land captured by Russians, U.S. top general says (msn.com)
Since the beginning of the Russian full-scale invasion, Ukraine has already liberated more than half of the Russian-occupied territories, as U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley says during a briefing after the Ramstein meeting. "Ukraine continues to achieve success. As of today, Ukraine has already liberated 54% of the occupied lands," Milley said.
So, let us see. The current occupied Russian part of Ukraine is roughly the size of the state of Ohio. So, Ukraine has taken back 50% of a land mass roughly 22,400 sq mi? That is way impressive. The map below shows twice that numbered under Russian control (red).
You can see all the current Ukrainian land mass taken back from Russia here - Eastern Front:
.
Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, September 19, 2023 | Institute for the Study of War (understandingwar.org)
Roughly 3 to 6 miles South and East in certain places. It does not amount to much. The price in casualties for Ukraine has been enormous.
I'll give credit for Ukraine in the Northern campaign in the early stages of this conflict. Maybe Milley is referring to that. A nice
spin to the story. Like 'Spin Marino.' Looks like San Marino and Mark Milley do have something in common. Something that happened 18 months ago. That was an amazing pushback of Russian troops - over a large area. Somehow it has not worked in the Eastern front. Russia is still making advances, but this part is not covered in the news. So, why was the Ukrainian Northern campaign so successful and the Eastern campaign such a failure?