D
Deleted member 585708
Guest
"But if we just let Putin do what he wants, he'll stop!"
![]()
It makes you wanna cry, doesn't it?
"But if we just let Putin do what he wants, he'll stop!"
![]()

Agreed. Hence Russia is not a threat to Europe. Not militarily anyway.Even if they keep the current territory (which I doubt) they completely lost their ability to project non-nuclear force and have most of their armed forces stuck in a quagmire.
How Pres. Putin has shafted Russia.
Look at that map. Russia is a massive country, but somehow it's still not enough.
. As Losses Pile Up, Ukraine Needs More Tanks And Fighting Vehicles (forbes.com)Yes Ukraine has lost some number of tanks and other equipment however what Russia has repeatedly done is release pictures of the same tanks or vehicles from different angles while claiming those were all separate tanks as they did from the first weeks of this 2023 offensive. It's incredibly disingenuous to post such information and pretend that it's even remotely accurate. This is beyond being naive. These are the type of things that you say that makes everyone question your motives.
Soon to be owned by their Chinese overlords.Look at that map. Russia is a massive country, but somehow it's still not enough.
You said Russia had lost this war. I told you this conflict was not over yet. What is there to put into perspective?You didn't really put in perspective anything, I showed you arguments on why has Rus failed on every single one of it's strategic tasks and you listed a number of wars lost or drew by the US.
The Ukrainian Army has not, is not, and will not be anywhere near what the North Vietnamese Army was during the 60s and 70s.Btw your examples confirm my stance of Rus unable to defeat Ukr army even more, because Ukr right now is stronger than Iraq, Vietnam or Afghanistan armies back then.
Why do you think the Americans lost the war in Vietnam?Plus Ukr is more unified than ever and way more unified than all those three countries.
Because the Ukrainian Army is growing weaker by the month. They are facing shortages of men and ammunition. The west is not giving Ukraine what it needs to win this conflict: Surface-to-surface missiles.And if those defeated US (a larger force than Rus by far), why is it impossible for Ukr to defeat Rus in it's already weak ass occupational attempt.
. As Losses Pile Up, Ukraine Needs More Tanks And Fighting Vehicles (forbes.com)
"Nine days into its 2023 counteroffensive, the Ukrainian army has lost at least four of the 85 Leopard 2 tanks its foreign allies have pledged to the war effort. And it’s apparent the Ukrainians expect to lose many more."
* Check the source.
You yourself have said many times in this thread series that we shouldn’t be aiding Ukraine because it risks a nuclear confrontation. Now it’s just propaganda?That is just Russian propaganda. If you want to believe it. It has been doing this for years. Iran is doing the same thing - for years now. What about the Iranian nuclear threat?
Argue? Legitimate questions mate. Two simple questions really.
What threat is Russia posing to the West? This conflict has been contained in Ukraine.
What other countries is Russia planning to invade besides Ukraine?
Nuclear confrontation if the West gets involved in this conflict (as in troops on the ground). Stop putting words in my mouth. Plus, yes, I don't think the US should have given Ukraine half of what it got in financial and military aid. Again, I believe this is a European problem.You yourself have said many times in this thread series that we shouldn’t be aiding Ukraine because it risks a nuclear confrontation. Now it’s just propaganda?
But only France complained when the US invaded Iraq.The Russian threat has been, and still is very real for Sweden and many other countries.
That looks like a nice collection of dildos.