This is truly hilarious. Claiming to be a voice of reading while continuously making false claims ("American bombings hit the wrong target 90% of the time") and peddling conspiracy theories ("this war is about enriching the global elite", "the pandemic was about government contracts for vaccines") with ZERO evidence, arguments or attempts to back up your claims - and you never admit to being wrong when it is clearly demonstrated to you.
Just for your general information, this war is not enriching "the global elite". In fact, inflation and rising energy prizes caused by this war have put a damper on consumption and production around the world. If you are a member of a global business elite, that is exactly what you DON'T want to see. Furthermore, if you are a globalist, a return to 1800's style nationalism and 1900's style ideological blocs are the OPPOSITE of what globalism is about.
Oh, and American drone strikes hit the intended target 95% of the time. The OPPOSITE of what you claim. Not that I expect you to admit that or even adress it: "The average value of strike precision after implementation of the near certainty standard grew to 95 percent, indicating U.S. strikes in Pakistan approached “
near-unerring accuracy” without carrying a risk of civilian harm. "
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/...casualties-during-us-drone-strikes-heres-how/
You are the exact opposite of a "voice of reason".