Law russell brand allegations

[avenue94]

No. In fact, is quite the opposite.

So you think the White House told the AP to write that? Or was it the Cia lol

 

[giusti825]

Who are these serious intellectuals?

It was a documentary a la British 20/20. Dramatic but thats how tv specials work.

They're supposed to be journalists, not entertainers..... Adding dramatic effects is for propagandists, not unbiased reporters....

 

[Hog-train]

 

[avenue94]

They're supposed to be journalists, not entertainers..... Adding dramatic effects is for propagandists, not unbiased reporters....

In a perfect world yes, but reporting has to be engaging. That's always been the case. It's why I prefer written reporting, or at least partly why.

 

[esotamoc]

In a perfect world yes, but reporting has to be engaging. That's always been the case. It's why I prefer written reporting, or at least partly why.

Jesus, you are so invested in this conversation- who is Russel Brand to you anyway? Why do you give a shit so much? you have said your opinion but you are still here. Strange. Sad.

 

[shinkyoku]

 

[avenue94]

Jesus, you are so invested in this conversation- who is Russel Brand to you anyway? Why do you give a shit so much? you have said your opinion but you are still here. Strange. Sad.

I'm amused, fascinated and horrified by the fever dreams of conspiracy theorists in here. With the cherry on top of the folks in this thread convinced that the allegations are baseless without even having read the actual reporting. It's a peak into proud ignorance you don't get to see up close and personal often.

 

[The_Renaissance]

Why is this such big news? It's a bigger talking point than fucking Prince Andrew being a nonce, for fuck's sake, on mainstream media platforms. Celebrities being sex pests and offenders is a frequent thing, why is this particular one getting such massive coverage?

 

[giusti825]

So you think the White House told the AP to write that? Or was it the Cia lol

With the way both have interfered in both social media and the MSM over the last few years, neither would be surprising.

However, the players here have already been uncovered. Dame Caroline Julian Dinenage, MP Chair, Culture, Media and Sports Committee, Baroness, Lancaster of Kimbledon, DBE (whose husband, Mark Lancaster, is coincidentally a Colonel and Deputy Commander of the 77th Brigade, a psyops and information warfare unit).

She is the one frantically writing letters to not just social media, but mainstream media demanding deplatforming, demonetization, and a more intense smear campaign against Brand.

On GB news, there was a debate about the situation with Brand. One reporter suggested that action shouldn't have been taken until at least a formal investigation had taken place.

For this heresy, Dinenage wrote a scathing letter demanding that not only should noone on the network be defending Brand, but they should be reporting just the accusations and asking more women to come forward. She is literally telling news stations how she wants them to report, cover and analyze the news.

This new online safety bill is the end of any semblance of free speech in the UK. Its a violation of the European charter on human rights. Dinenage is now calling for Rumble to be banned from the UK entirely, in order for the UK to be "the safest place in the world" to use the Internet.

Welcome to the new British ministry of truth.

 

[Zazen]

I'm not taking anyone named Starchild seriously. I don't think there's a bigger red flag in a chick than someone who is deep into new age bullshit astrology.

 

[Zazen]

Why is this such big news? It's a bigger talking point than fucking Prince Andrew being a nonce, for fuck's sake, on mainstream media platforms. Celebrities being sex pests and offenders is a frequent thing, why is this particular one getting such massive coverage?

It wouldn't be a big deal normally but now that he's been spouting off views that align with a lot of right-wingers they are all trying to protect him. If he was a leftie he'd be called a groomer often. Strange times

 

[Hog-train]

I'm not taking anyone named Starchild seriously. I don't think there's a bigger red flag in a chick than someone who is deep into new age bullshit astrology.

That's just their burlesque dancer stage name - real name is Tali De Mar. They're just talking about their experience dating the man. WTF difference does it make with a stage name.

 

[Zazen]

That's just their burlesque dancer stage name - real name is Tali De Mar. They're just talking about their experience dating the man. WTF difference does it make with a stage name.

Obviously into astrology either way based on what's in her background and her name.

Didn't realize this person was trans though.

 

[The_Renaissance]

Obviously into astrology either way based on what's in his background and his name.

Didn't realize this person was a man though.

Fixed.

 

[I Am Legion]

I'm not taking anyone named Starchild seriously. I don't think there's a bigger red flag in a chick than someone who is deep into new age bullshit astrology.

I guess I would respond to that saying if anyone that was looking to make a buck in a false accusation, it could be someone like her. Instead she claims he was a loving dude. I think as a society we need to have some laws in place to protect victims, but also suspects until they are proven guilty. We are in a society where anyone can just point a finger and claim rape or abuse. Every one of us has been in a relationship that didn't work. How would we all be if we were targets of a disgruntled ex? Most of us do not have the cache to warrant it. But the rich and famous do. I hate this 20 years later bullshit. But like I said with Masterson, if he is guilty fuck him, but without proof who knows?

 

[Andy Capp]

I hope some of the libtards in this thread can explain why they act like these salacious newspaper smears are so convincing and yet the police are not even investigating?

EDIT: As I have long predicted, the leftist UK police force has now joined the conspiracy to go after Russel Brand for daring to speak the truth.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-66918331

if this does not convince you that this entire thing is a coordinated attack campaign by the global elites, I have a a COVID vaccine booster to sell you

Like I said earlier, if the Times has tossed journalistic standards out the window and they're making shit up, then fuck'em but how likely do you think it is they're making this up?

You think this is a "salacious newspaper smear"?

• One woman alleges that Brand raped her without a condom against a wall in his Los Angeles home. She says Brand tried to stop her leaving until she told him she was going to the bathroom. She was reportedly treated at a rape crisis centre on the same day, which the Times says it has confirmed via medical records

 

[PhitePhan]

Like I said earlier, if the Times has tossed journalistic standards out the window and they're making shit up, then fuck'em but how likely do you think it is they're making this up?

You think this is a "salacious newspaper smear"?

• One woman alleges that Brand raped her without a condom against a wall in his Los Angeles home. She says Brand tried to stop her leaving until she told him she was going to the bathroom. She was reportedly treated at a rape crisis centre on the same day, which the Times says it has confirmed via medical records

Was that the one who had consensual sex and was upset about Brand not using a condom?

Don’t get me wrong, that’s a fucked up move and reprehensible.

If so, could it be that rape crisis centres also test for STDs, and that was the purpose of the visit? If so, in theory the Times could have reviewed records and technically be telling the truth (woman was seen at a rape crisis center) although implying something untrue (that she was forced to have sex).

Text message is in the article below:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/russell-brands-late-night-text-30966457#google_vignette

 

[giusti825]

Like I said earlier, if the Times has tossed journalistic standards out the window and they're making shit up, then fuck'em but how likely do you think it is they're making this up?

You think this is a "salacious newspaper smear"?

• One woman alleges that Brand raped her without a condom against a wall in his Los Angeles home. She says Brand tried to stop her leaving until she told him she was going to the bathroom. She was reportedly treated at a rape crisis centre on the same day, which the Times says it has confirmed via medical records

Real journalists don't use anonymous sources..... There's nothing more unprofessional. You could be making the whole thing up with no way to verify. Without an extremely strong piece of corroborating evidence that can be immediately displayed or used in the article itself, anonymous sources are bullshit.

 

[Jack V Savage]

If you honestly believe that the liberal establishment got even most things right during the pandemic, there is no helping you. Did you take the injections? Did you get COVID?

Well, first let me note that you're switching between a discussion of liberalism (we agree that Brand is not a liberal because his thinking is more based on intuition and fantasy than reason) to some "liberal establishment," which isn't even defined. But, yes, of course liberal institutions were getting better results than the CT community, and like all responsible people, I got vaccinated. I haven't gotten COVID myself (not sure why you're asking).

Youre trapped in a cult that you are incapable of criticizing.

Bit of projection there, friend.

What exactly are you refuting here? Do you honestly believe that the will of the working class majority is carried out more than the donors class? That's ridiculous.

I don't believe "the will of the working class" or "the will of the donor class" are actually definable things, and you're changing the subject again. I was merely noting your inability to discuss what liberalism is without injecting your negative affective response to the term, which is a sign of a trait that most people grow out of.

Liberalism as a philosophy exists, however, the group of people identifying themselves as liberals have completely turned their backs on the core tenets of that philosophy.

Modern "liberals" are so ideologically different from 90s liberals, you would think they were entirely different people. 90s liberals had principles and ideological consistency. Modern "liberals" are just party loyalists to the point you would believe the party was a church.

90s liberals are still alive and still liberals. You should try reading what they say rather than what dishonest propagandists like Carlson and Greenwald tell you they think.

 

[Kung Fu Kowboy]

OP Checks Out