- Joined
- May 18, 2006
- Messages
- 4,542
- Reaction score
- 1
because you know its a shit sandwich.
lol
because you know its a shit sandwich.
Sure, but fighting an on duty police officer is a crap shoot. I wouldn't recommend it. I would suggest obey the officers orders. If you feel like you are mistreated, go through the process and file a complaint. It might be a pain in the ass, but it certainly beats the possible alternative.
It's crazy, even in this thread it's people talking about how this community needs to do this and that community needs to stop doing that, people ranting and raving about how this is all the fault of "Liberals", and now who jumped to what conclusion with new evidence.
The Police (at least it seems like it right now, if this has been shown to be incorrect I apologize) went out and started going after journalists as soon as this became a public issue. Teargassing people covering the events and confiscating their equipment? Detaining reporters who are REPORTING on the events? How can this part not be dominating the conversation at this point? Heck, at this point it seems like no one is even going to care about this part of it.
Don't protest cops because they are public servants trying to protect you. We make cops out to be the bad guys then wonder why only people with chips on their shoulder want to be cops.
Disproportionate to how big the problem actually is. Everyones sign says "don't shoot me" "I'm black don't shoot me" "hands up don't shoot". Like I said, in the last four years >1000 people have been gunned down and murdered in the greater STL area. One person was possibly murdered by cops and this garned more response than the other 1000 murders combined. Shrewd logic.
Yes, a letter would be more appropriate than a riot.
With all due respect, I think the ones protesting are in far better position than you to decide how big the problem of police brutality and abuse of authority in their community is, especially when you're saying that the same organization tear gassing and stealing journalists' equipment only ever ''try to protect you.''
Disproportionate to how big the problem actually is. Everyones sign says "don't shoot me" "I'm black don't shoot me" "hands up don't shoot". Like I said, in the last four years >1000 people have been gunned down and murdered in the greater STL area. One person was possibly murdered by cops and this garned more response than the other 1000 murders combined. Shrewd logic.
![]()
It has been confirmed him and his friend did rob the gas station. Missouri law states that any theft that uses force is 2nd degree felony. Which gives probable cause for a police officer to stop and arrest suspect. If suspect fights back, police can use deadly force.
With all due respect, I think the ones protesting are in far better position than you to decide how big the problem of police brutality and abuse of authority in their community is,
Ahh yes, anyone who makes any claim about what they feel is "in a better position". Why would anyone challenge anybodies ideas? How silly of me.
especially when you're saying that the same organization tear gassing and stealing journalists' equipment only ever ''try to protect you.''
I'm sure lots of things deviated from standard protocol. When riots occur S happens. I'm certainly not going to try to nominate Ferguson for an award on riot control.
Or protests. Or indeed anything that would garner any significant attention to the issue. That seems to be a bee in your bonnet
The bees in my bonnet are (1) the lack of intellectual dishonesty in the protestors and news sources with an agenda to push. It is people trying to push an agenda or internal narrative while not applying standards evenly. (2) Widespread confirmation bias and lack of objective analysis. This one issue is a sympton of a major cultural and societal problem that goes across to all races, groups and political parties. (3) The cultural portrayal of our nation's police officers based on incidents that don't represent the overwhelming majority of police action.
I'm not trying to demonize just the urban STL people who I sincerely wish the best for, I just think they aren't very logical in identifying and prioritizing their plights (which to me seems to be a major problem for other geographical areas, demographics, etc as well)
What if the police officer's story is not correct? Would you change your mind? It seems to me, based on what we've seen since the incident, that it's at least suspect.
New police chief of Ferguson MO walks with protestors.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/14/ron-johnson-ferguson_n_5680351.html
Ahh yeah, huffington post. Who have an article titled, "it doesn't matter if Brown robbed(or assaulted)" A few days ago they were calling for the police officers history (which is clean). I'm sure if the officer had a record of police brutality they would run an article "It doesn't matter if the Officer has a disciplinary history.'
The site that is now going to front page every and any incident in all of america that is any way paints a police officer in a bad light.
They have just as bad spin as Fox News.
New police chief of Ferguson MO walks with protestors.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/14/ron-johnson-ferguson_n_5680351.html
The bees in my bonnet are (1) the lack of intellectual dishonesty in the protestors and news sources with an agenda to push. It is people trying to push an agenda or internal narrative while not applying standards evenly. (2) Widespread confirmation bias and lack of objective analysis. This one issue is a sympton of a major cultural and societal problem that goes across to all races, groups and political parties. (3) The cultural portrayal of our nation's police officers based on incidents that don't represent the overwhelming majority of police action.
I'm not trying to demonize just the urban STL people who I sincerely wish the best for, I just think they aren't very logical in identifying and prioritizing their plights (which to me seems to be a major problem for other geographical areas, demographics, etc as well)
In what way did they spin the above story?
Ahh yeah, huffington post. Who have an article titled, "it doesn't matter if Brown robbed(or assaulted)" A few days ago they were calling for the police officers history (which is clean). I'm sure if the officer had a record of police brutality they would run an article "It doesn't matter if the Officer has a disciplinary history.'
The site that is now going to front page every and any incident in all of america that is any way paints a police officer in a bad light.
They have just as bad spin as Fox News.
He's trying to calm the masses.
Yeah, he definitely thinks Brown got what was coming to him despite the show of solidarity.
He's trying to calm the masses. As a black man he can do it. Its not likely the white chief we know of could get away with it.