lol this again. There is no mass immigration and the problems are not what right wing people make them out to be. Civil unrest/ riots isn’t something solely for immigrants.
And it isn’t that uncommon for migrants to hate on other migrant groups especially when there is difference in religion or culture. The crabs in a bucket phenomenon.
But you’re making a few mistakes in your whole conception of this subject.
1. Their is no mass immigration. Muslims account for maybe 5/6% of European citizens. And immigrants account for something like 14% of Swedish citizens.
2. Problems with immigrants mainly stem from socioeconomic factors and not them being immigrants or religion/ culture
3. There was no failure in the last decade
4. Yes it is mainly due to policies and lack of understanding that these group fail to fit in society
5. Most of the immigrants come from war torn countries where they had a high living standard before they left the country. It is common knowledge that the more wealthier immigrants leave because it’s very expensive.
So yeah you shouldn’t let the right wing anti immigrant propaganda influence you that much. Most of these people are just looking for a better life for themself and their families.
LOL ! "Migrant groups hate other migrant group" Obviously true, if you're focusing on being a migrant instead of assimilating.
Also "There are no problems." Yes, hand grenades and drive-by's in Sweden are normal, hundreds of years of tradition.
1. There is mass-immigration (just stick to your Sweden as an example, with a population of 10M and having a net immigration of tens of thousands a year can be considered as MASSIVE, with 1 net migrant per 14 minutes, 20% foreign-born and another 7% born in Sweden to foreigners..) this is a level that no country can sustain.
2. Socioeconomic factors, being able to live in a welfare state without everything provided, you mean?
3. You don't consider civil unrest as failure? Why don't you just take your head out of your ass and enjoy the Swedish crime statistics.
4. There has been nothing but understanding and support in the billions to accommodate these people, with very little effort from themselves (admittedly, bad policy because it's based on empathy and not seeking to assimilate the people)
5. And so what if they're from war torn countries and they are rich, you say? So they should be provided the similar level by the Nordic tax-payer because they are used of having a certain standard of living? What countries are they? Iraq? Somalia? Iran? Afghanistan? Morocco? Bosnia? Syria? Or the Sub-Saharan African countries?
Saying that these people are just looking for a better life for themselves is garbage, because they've abused our obsolete asylum-system to the fullest on the expense of others. Why wouldn't I be against that?