Elections RFK getting roasted at presentation hearing

Last post since you are actually so blinded by your ideology you refuse to even read the sources I am posting.

I didn't claim anything. I posted a source from the CDC that said it was a FACT that they removed thimerosal from childhood vaccines since 2001. I quoted it in the first post.

Then I posted another source dated

from the CDC showing that they are still using thimerosal in multi-dose influenza vaccines.

I then posted another source from immunize.org dated

that showed that children in certain states where thimerosal hasn't been banned are still given multi-dose influenza vaccines with thimerosal.

Here's an official Illinois government source:
<lmao>

Another source for what?

Are multi-dose vaccines for flu "children's vaccines"? According to your source, they specify "children's vaccines" and provide a link to a list of vaccines and whether or not they contain thimerosal, don't they?

To wit,
Thimerosal was taken out of childhood vaccines in the United States in 2001.
  • Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccines do not and never did contain thimerosal.
  • Varicella (chickenpox), inactivated polio (IPV), and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines have also never contained thimerosal.
  • Influenza (flu) vaccines are currently available in both thimerosal-containing (for multi-dose vaccine vials) and thimerosal-free versions.
For a complete list of vaccines and their thimerosal content level, see the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Thimerosal in Vaccines page."

Where in the other CDC document you posted does it contradict any of his? That is what you claimed. It's not even a little misleading. All the other document says is multi-dose vials of flu vaccines contain it without the added detail of the above. There is no contradiction.

Goddamn, you must be used to hanging out with a lot of knuckle-draggers if you think this is at all clever.

Edit: pardon me, upon rereading I missed where you shifted the goal posts. I'm not searching through "immunize.org", nor whatever other bullshit to "do my own research" to prove your point for you. You made the claim, let's see the contradictions. I'm sure they'll all be 100 percent double-blind randomized trials and that will settle everything once and for all so it should be easy peasy for you.
 
Last edited:
Last post since you are actually so blinded by your ideology you refuse to even read the sources I am posting.

I didn't claim anything. I posted a source from the CDC that said it was a FACT that they removed thimerosal from childhood vaccines since 2001. I quoted it in the first post.

Then I posted another source dated

from the CDC showing that they are still using thimerosal in multi-dose influenza vaccines.

I then posted another source from immunize.org dated

that showed that children in certain states where thimerosal hasn't been banned are still given multi-dose influenza vaccines with thimerosal.

Here's an official Illinois government source:
you destroyed that kid and he isn't even bright enough to realize it. Your gonna have to link a slate.com article or Wikipedia, those are more on his level.
 
The throat cancer/robot voice isn't helping RFK's chances IMO..
My money is on confirmation, regardless. Biden got a tranny confirmed as the assistant health sec, ffs. And I wouldn't have it any other way. Every potus nom needs to be confirmed so those assholes get all the credit if it works out and all the blame if it doesn't. No excuses, play like a champion!
 
Damn, we need an investigation on the Onesiesgate. That could derrail any appointment.
 
<lmao>

Another source for what?

Are multi-dose vaccines for flu "children's vaccines"? According to your source, they specify "children's vaccines" and provide a link to a list of vaccines and whether or not they contain thimerosal, don't they?

To wit,
Thimerosal was taken out of childhood vaccines in the United States in 2001.
  • Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccines do not and never did contain thimerosal.
  • Varicella (chickenpox), inactivated polio (IPV), and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines have also never contained thimerosal.
  • Influenza (flu) vaccines are currently available in both thimerosal-containing (for multi-dose vaccine vials) and thimerosal-free versions.
For a complete list of vaccines and their thimerosal content level, see the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Thimerosal in Vaccines page."

Where in the other CDC document you posted does it contradict any of his? That is what you claimed. It's not even a little misleading. All the other document says is multi-dose vials of flu vaccines contain it without the added detail of the above. There is no contradiction.

Goddamn, you must be used to hanging out with a lot of knuckle-draggers if you think this is at all clever.

Edit: pardon me, upon rereading I missed where you shifted the goal posts. I'm not searching through "immunize.org", nor whatever other bullshit to "do my own research" to prove your point for you. You made the claim, let's see the contradictions. I'm sure they'll all be 100 percent double-blind randomized trials and that will settle everything once and for all so it should be easy peasy for you.
Okay, actual last post because I'm getting tired of literally doing all the work and you just constantly ignoring it. Multiple sources show children are still receiving multi-dose vaccines containing thimerosal. The CDC is lying when it said it removed it from childhood vaccines. Again, look at an official Illinois Department of Public Health link for confirmation (you know, the people that actually administer vaccines in Illinois). They even say that Fluvirin, a single-dose flu vaccine shot contains trace amounts of thimerosal as well.

Why is thimerosal still in some flu vaccines that children may receive?​

  • To produce enough flu vaccine for the entire country, some of it must be put into multi-dose vials. These vials have very tiny amounts of thimerosal as a preservative. This is necessary because each time an individual dose is drawn from a multi-dose vial with a new needle and syringe, there is the potential to contaminate the vial with harmful microbes (toxins). So, this preservative is needed to prevent contamination of the vial (as a safeguard) when individual doses are drawn from it, and keep the children safety who are receiving the flu shot from the multi-dose vial. Children can safely receive flu vaccine that contains thimerosal.
  • Flu vaccine that does not contain thimerosal is available in single-dose vials or single-dose syringes. One formulation of single-dose inactivated flu vaccine, Fluvirin, contains trace amounts of thimerosal.

This official government site also has the same thing that immunize.org quotes:
  • Thimerosal was removed from all childhood vaccines in 2001 with the exception of inactivated flu vaccine in multi-dose vials. However, thimerosal has been removed from all single-dose preparations of flu vaccine for children and adults. No acceptable alternative preservative has yet been identified for multi-dose flu vaccine vials.

Is the Department of Public Health in Illinois enough of a source for you? Or are you just going to continue being a hack?

These are the people who actually administer the vaccines for children program in Illinois minus Chicago:
The Vaccines For Children (VFC) program is a federally funded, state administered program that provides free vaccines to eligible children ages 18 and younger. Vaccines are provided at no cost to the provider or the patient. Providers are able to charge an administration fee for the vaccine.
The Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) is responsible for administering the VFC program within the state excluding the City of Chicago. The Chicago Department of Public Health is responsible for administering the VFC program within Chicago city limits. To learn more about the City of Chicago program, see RESOURCES in the right-hand column.

So tell me, how can the CDC state that it's a "FACT" that thimerosal was removed from children's vaccines when I've shown you that a state is admitting to still administering them to children as part of their children vaccination program? And it isn't the only state, it's just the first one I found. The reason is because they are misleading people. And all of this should've been obvious with my original post, or easily clarified with some additional Google searches. But instead you chose to waste my time explaining it to you. I wont make the same mistake of wasting my valuable time on responding to you again.

Edit: I also find it funny how you think a site like immunize.org, that's entire existence is to promote immunizations to the public, would for some reason be biased in the complete opposite direction. It's so idiotic that you would even say that that it is completely laughable. If you did even a minute of research you would realize that they are completely legitimate as well, but I guess that's too much to think about for someone of your caliber. Since I've evaluated you as too dumb to debate and a complete waste of my time I've decided to add you to my ignore list.
 
Last edited:
<lmao>

Another source for what?

Are multi-dose vaccines for flu "children's vaccines"? According to your source, they specify "children's vaccines" and provide a link to a list of vaccines and whether or not they contain thimerosal, don't they?

To wit,
Thimerosal was taken out of childhood vaccines in the United States in 2001.
  • Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccines do not and never did contain thimerosal.
  • Varicella (chickenpox), inactivated polio (IPV), and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines have also never contained thimerosal.
  • Influenza (flu) vaccines are currently available in both thimerosal-containing (for multi-dose vaccine vials) and thimerosal-free versions.
For a complete list of vaccines and their thimerosal content level, see the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Thimerosal in Vaccines page."

Where in the other CDC document you posted does it contradict any of his? That is what you claimed. It's not even a little misleading. All the other document says is multi-dose vials of flu vaccines contain it without the added detail of the above. There is no contradiction.

Goddamn, you must be used to hanging out with a lot of knuckle-draggers if you think this is at all clever.

Edit: pardon me, upon rereading I missed where you shifted the goal posts. I'm not searching through "immunize.org", nor whatever other bullshit to "do my own research" to prove your point for you. You made the claim, let's see the contradictions. I'm sure they'll all be 100 percent double-blind randomized trials and that will settle everything once and for all so it should be easy peasy for you.
Vaccines given to children are by definition “childhood vaccines,” no?

<{vega}>
 
One of my geek pastimes when playing online poker (real money) at home is watching Congressional Appointment hearings. I've watch a ton of Democrat appointed judges that have ZERO business being nominated. Some of the Democrat nominees are such hard Left Woksters that it's crazy. Others simply have no legal background to justify their nominations. The Democrats don't even show up to the hearings. The Republicans do and expose the frauds these people are an how bad the Democrats just want politicos on the bench. Then the lockstep Left Democrats vote party line to allow tons of nutters in. I can share some videos of highly unqualified candidates getting through. With all that, the attacks on RFK, Tulsi, Hegeseth, and Kash over experience is a laugh. They are so over qualified in comparison to the Democrat nominees it's not close.
 
Twisted as I am, I keep imagining Kristi Noem and Tulsi Gabbard going North/South.
635bdc3784017fc9ad69e3b2_Kristi%20Tulsi.jpg

I know, I know.
Depraved individual.
 
Last edited:
you destroyed that kid and he isn't even bright enough to realize it. Your gonna have to link a slate.com article or Wikipedia, those are more on his level.
Heh, yeah, you better pat each other on the back because no one else will.
 
Poor Bernie got cucked again. Biggest pharma recipient tried to have a meltdown over a baby onesie about not shooting up infants with the clot shot, then looked like he was going to cry when he found out RFK doesn't even work with that group anymore and asked him to call them anyway and tell them to stop selling baby onesies, then started raging again when he got called out for being the biggest recipient from big pharma. It was almost as entertaining as how defensive that grifter gets whenever he's trying to dupe kids into raging about millionaires, and says it's only moral when he makes millions and has 3 houses and his wife takes a large severence for bankrupting a college by taking fraudulent loans and riding off into the sunset. <lol>


I also liked the 2nd biggest recipient of pharma money, Pocahontas, asking him not sue big pharma after leaving office.


His visual lack of wellness alone should disqualify him from any matters regarding public health.
Totes, bro. A guy who's jacked at 71 should be nowhere near giving any health advice. Health advice should obviously be left to obese men with teeth rotting out of their head who started wearing a dress at 55 years old



071023_rfkjr_muscles_web.jpg



iu
 
Back
Top