• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Opinion RFK calls for retraction of Danish vaccine study

- Smokers are selfish imbeciles thought. I hate those piece of trash throwing their stupid cigars on trails.
I just think it's real funny to attack medical scientists re: smoking when all of medicine has been trying to eliminate smoking for decades lol
It's the private capitalist wing of venture science that served to legitimize Big Tobacco and their desperate panic wrestling
 
I just think it's real funny to attack medical scientists re: smoking when all of medicine has been trying to eliminate smoking for decades lol
It's the private capitalist wing of venture science that served to legitimize Big Tobacco and their desperate panic wrestling
This explains a lot. Growing up my doc was a Chesterfield man.
 
I just think it's real funny to attack medical scientists re: smoking when all of medicine has been trying to eliminate smoking for decades lol
It's the private capitalist wing of venture science that served to legitimize Big Tobacco and their desperate panic wrestling
- Theres a movement here, Saying that smoking doesnt cause health problems. Guys post several "studies". I dont care if they die, even if that make me look like a ass. DOnt thrown that stupid cigar in the wood and burns vegetation and animal, and just die alone. Thjose pigs also love to thrown that stupid cigar on the beaches sand.
 
Liberals suffer from a lack of cognitive dissonance resolution. Meaning you hear something from authority, fully believe it, then it gets disproven and you completely shelf the fact that it was disproven so you're fresh to believe in the next line of bullshit.

Medical doctors and scientists told us smoking was not harmful. They told us Oxycontin was not addictive. They told us to eat 6-11 servings of carbs per day. They told us dousing our food in Round Up was perfectly fine for us. They completely lied about all sorts of COVID information.

Yet here you stand, ready to believe yet another line of their bullshit.

Try using your own common sense. Does injecting aluminum into the human body seem like a good or a bad thing? If you need a doctor to give you that answer, you're exponentially dumber than the 'dumbfuck' on youtube who says it's probably not a good idea to inject aluminum.

Dose and context matter. Many substances that are harmful in large amounts can be therapeutic in tiny, controlled doses. Skepticism is always warranted but you also have to remember that science and medicine took our life expectancy from around 40 years old in the early 19th century to over 80 today.
 
It was medical doctors and scientists who convinced us it was harmful lol
You're replying to an imbecile. Plain and simple.
This explains a lot. Growing up my doc was a Chesterfield man.
Being a doctor doesn't make you immune to drug addiction. That's not intended to be a knock on you--just making a point.
 
It was medical doctors and scientists who convinced us it was harmful lol

You are completely missing the point. The point is that the scientists and doctors told everyone that smoking was not harmful. It took years and billions of dollars in tobacco profits in order for the real truth to get out.

This conversation I'm having right here is just a rehash of that conversation at that time. I am saying that combusting plants and inhaling the smoke can't be good for you because common sense tells you that there's a reason why your body reacts adversely to smoke. The liberals are telling me it's not bad because the scientists and doctors say so.

Fast forward a few years and the people who were relying solely on the "experts" were completely wrong and the people that used their own brain and common sense were right.

It's laughable that you guys can't see that we are rehashing the exact same thing right here with aluminum being injected into our bodies. Fucking nuts that you guys have no common sense with this one.
 
Isn’t it weird that you didn’t answer my question?

If your question was you attempting to say that they only use a coke can full of glyphosate to treat their land, then no, I will not answer it because it's not truthful at all.

How about you take a bottle of Round Up and just spritz it across your tomato plants? Don't even have to use much, just spray a tiny bit on it and then eat it a week later. The scientists you fully trust say it's okay.

This is what it's like arguing with you guys. I can't even believe we need to have this conversation. Clown world shit right here.

 
Dose and context matter. Many substances that are harmful in large amounts can be therapeutic in tiny, controlled doses. Skepticism is always warranted but you also have to remember that science and medicine took our life expectancy from around 40 years old in the early 19th century to over 80 today.

We were told that one alcoholic drink a day wasn't bad for you and even had health benefits.

Common sense (there's that term again) says that's ridiculous. Alcohol feels like poison when you're consuming it. Is it healthier to have your body process 14,600 drinks over the course of 40 years or to have it process no alcohol over 40 years? "Science" said it was perfectly fine at one point. Anyone with half a brain knew that was ridiculous.
 
If your question was you attempting to say that they only use a coke can full of glyphosate to treat their land, then no, I will not answer it because it's not truthful at all.

How about you take a bottle of Round Up and just spritz it across your tomato plants? Don't even have to use much, just spray a tiny bit on it and then eat it a week later. The scientists you fully trust say it's okay.

This is what it's like arguing with you guys. I can't even believe we need to have this conversation. Clown world shit right here.



You won’t even answer a simple question.
Concession accepted.
 
You are completely missing the point. The point is that the scientists and doctors told everyone that smoking was not harmful. It took years and billions of dollars in tobacco profits in order for the real truth to get out.

This conversation I'm having right here is just a rehash of that conversation at that time. I am saying that combusting plants and inhaling the smoke can't be good for you because common sense tells you that there's a reason why your body reacts adversely to smoke. The liberals are telling me it's not bad because the scientists and doctors say so.

Fast forward a few years and the people who were relying solely on the "experts" were completely wrong and the people that used their own brain and common sense were right.

It's laughable that you guys can't see that we are rehashing the exact same thing right here with aluminum being injected into our bodies. Fucking nuts that you guys have no common sense with this one.
I'm not even sure where to start with this mess lol
It wasn't John Q Public who actually demonstrated, medically/scientifically, that smoking is ass; it was scientists and doctors who did the science and medicine.
Did you know we once thought asbestos was safe? Or how about lead? You're like Mac from It's Always Sunny trying to convince the gang evolution is wrong because "science is a liar sonetimes"
 
We were told that one alcoholic drink a day wasn't bad for you and even had health benefits.

Common sense (there's that term again) says that's ridiculous. Alcohol feels like poison when you're consuming it. Is it healthier to have your body process 14,600 drinks over the course of 40 years or to have it process no alcohol over 40 years? "Science" said it was perfectly fine at one point. Anyone with half a brain knew that was ridiculous.
Ah yes, who needs science when we have "common sense" lol
 
I'm not even sure where to start with this mess lol
It wasn't John Q Public who actually demonstrated, medically/scientifically, that smoking is ass; it was scientists and doctors who did the science and medicine.
Did you know we once thought asbestos was safe? Or how about lead? You're like Mac from It's Always Sunny trying to convince the gang evolution is wrong because "science is a liar sonetimes"

You haven't even begun to refute anything because you can't.

I never said that John Q Public proved that smoking was bad for you. The only reason why the people who I'm debating with know that smoking is bad is because we're already well out in front of the information. The story has already been told. Otherwise you would have been completely fooled by it if you grew up in the time where the lie was told to turn profits.

The story hasn't been fully told on aluminum injections and glyphosate. Once the story is told, common sense will prevail again.

It's clear you guys have outsourced your common sense to other people so it's not surprising that you can't pick up on the simple logic here.
 
You haven't even begun to refute anything because you can't.

I never said that John Q Public proved that smoking was bad for you. The only reason why the people who I'm debating with know that smoking is bad is because we're already well out in front of the information. The story has already been told. Otherwise you would have been completely fooled by it if you grew up in the time where the lie was told to turn profits.

The story hasn't been fully told on aluminum injections and glyphosate. Once the story is told, common sense will prevail again.

It's clear you guys have outsourced your common sense to other people so it's not surprising that you can't pick up on the simple logic here.
What in God's holy name are you blathering about
 
You won’t even answer a simple question.
Concession accepted.

No I would not want to eat vegetables with any amount of glyphosate on them. Even in your fictional coke can that covers a farm scenario. Laughable lol. Hilarious that you think you have some sort of gotcha on your hands here. Please, continue to defend ingesting glyphosate.

I see you didn't answer my question as well. Concession accepted.
 
Try using your own common sense. Does injecting aluminum into the human body seem like a good or a bad thing?

This point has already been explained to you and your argument, debunked.

You aren't some edgelord brave enough to look to outside sources that us sheep can't find. It's fucking youtube. You don't even understand the argument you put forward, or how the trace evidence of aluminum compounds (you keep leaving that out), has shown no evidence of harm in the human body.

So you listened to a shitty source that left out a key portion of information. You got caught, and then you still have the gall to pretend you're some free thinker we just can't puzzle out.

It's boring.
 
Like RFK is finding out, don't go against the machine, there is a lot of money involved.


 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,271,263
Messages
57,707,673
Members
175,812
Latest member
Omidullah81
Back
Top