• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Opinion RFK calls for retraction of Danish vaccine study

Oh sure, sure…



You understand that it is professional scientists conducting systematic reviews who repeatedly find vaccine safety research to be low/very low quality, right?

Just by the laws of averages I'm sure that there a some low quality studies, but I'm fairly certain that the overall body of work is robust. I explained to you earlier what the aim of this study cited was and how it was impossible to create a true control group here. Why do you believe it's low quality?

The context of the meaning of safety?

As a parent, the context of the meaning of safety is, what is my child’s risk from the disease versus the vaccine? If you want to give my healthy child a vaccine to protect against an almost non-existent threat, you’d better have something better than low/very low quality evidence that it’s safe.

I recognize that this is a privileged position, and that I have the benefit of healthy children and easy access to care… vaccination might make sense for others without such privilege, and I’d imagine risk skews in favor of vaccination in other areas/circumstances.

The fact that your are casting aspersions and resorting to name calling and deflection is very telling, and suggests that you probably understand your argument has no merit.

Do you forget that your privileged position was brought to you by modern science, engineering and MEDICINE. Most people in the western world today don't need to worry about the infectious diseases which used to plague previous generations because of modern advancements which includes herd immunity brought to us by mass vaccinations. Your fine with accepting and living with this privilege and not acknowledging and taking part with what gave it to us? How is a child contracting the measles and passing it on to others safer than the measles vaccine?

And if you're going to cite febrile seizures, we've had this discussion in the past. You didn't respond to this post:

https://forums.sherdog.com/threads/...reads-measles-outbreak.4355635/post-174972858
 
There is a clear methodology issue with this study.

This study does not include a truly unvaccinated control group, which limits its ability to completely rule out possible harms from aluminum additives. There is evidence to suggest aluminum builds up in the body and cross into the brain, creating big concerns about repeated exposure during early childhood. We need to be skeptical here.

RFK bless

There is more evidence that suggest that body is very good at clearing out aluminum in the doses that humans encounter it in the world. Have you actually looked at those studies you're touting and seen the peer review analysis?

Of course there are conditions that make aluminum in food and environment toxic to humans (kidney disease for one)... but that isn't what alarmists like RFK are suggesting. And even those with the worst kind of kidney disease wouldn't be harmed by the TINY amount of aluminum in vaccines, which is RFK's motive.
 
There is more evidence that suggest that body is very good at clearing out aluminum in the doses that humans encounter it in the world. Have you actually looked at those studies you're touting and seen the peer review analysis?

Of course there are conditions that make aluminum in food and environment toxic to humans (kidney disease for one)... but that isn't what alarmists like RFK are suggesting. And even those with the worst kind of kidney disease wouldn't be harmed by the TINY amount of aluminum in vaccines, which is RFK's motive.
he tapped out a few pages ago after it was obvious he was copy pasta AI results without even reviewing their accuracy or relevancy.
 
we have a control group, they're called the amish, and they're fine.

also, if you took an emergency mandated only jab, that never went through the full length clinicals/trials, where every other vaccine before did, then STFU because you don't understand shit. 100% safe and effective my ass.
 
he tapped out a few pages ago after it was obvious he was copy pasta AI results without even reviewing their accuracy or relevancy.
I'm seeing this more often from posters, citing AI summaries and articles they didn't read. AI brain rot is going to be intense.
 
RFK is a joke if the leaked MAHA reports are anywhere close to being true. No regulations for food industry or pesticides, just recommendations.

So the government is going to recommend we eat healthy. Such an improvement.
 
I'm seeing this more often from posters, citing AI summaries and articles they didn't read. AI brain rot is going to be intense.
It’s not much different from the posters who constantly spam tweets from other people to substitute for their own thoughts. It’s just that now they’re passing it off as their own ideas instead of having plausible deniability when called out on how stupid their posts are.
 
It’s not much different from the posters who constantly spam tweets from other people to substitute for their own thoughts. It’s just that now they’re passing it off as their own ideas instead of having plausible deniability when called out on how stupid their posts are.
The difference is with tweets they're short or have images and/or short videos so even these knuckleheads can process that level of info.

With the AI they think they've found a shortcut for absorbing more substantial material but it's an illusion, they're better off with the tweets.
 
It largely comes down to who you trust: medical doctors, or some dumbfuck on youtube.

Liberals suffer from a lack of cognitive dissonance resolution. Meaning you hear something from authority, fully believe it, then it gets disproven and you completely shelf the fact that it was disproven so you're fresh to believe in the next line of bullshit.

Medical doctors and scientists told us smoking was not harmful. They told us Oxycontin was not addictive. They told us to eat 6-11 servings of carbs per day. They told us dousing our food in Round Up was perfectly fine for us. They completely lied about all sorts of COVID information.

Yet here you stand, ready to believe yet another line of their bullshit.

Try using your own common sense. Does injecting aluminum into the human body seem like a good or a bad thing? If you need a doctor to give you that answer, you're exponentially dumber than the 'dumbfuck' on youtube who says it's probably not a good idea to inject aluminum.
 
Liberals suffer from a lack of cognitive dissonance resolution. Meaning you hear something from authority, fully believe it, then it gets disproven and you completely shelf the fact that it was disproven so you're fresh to believe in the next line of bullshit.

Medical doctors and scientists told us smoking was not harmful. They told us Oxycontin was not addictive. They told us to eat 6-11 servings of carbs per day. They told us dousing our food in Round Up was perfectly fine for us. They completely lied about all sorts of COVID information.

Yet here you stand, ready to believe yet another line of their bullshit.

Try using your own common sense. Does injecting aluminum into the human body seem like a good or a bad thing? If you need a doctor to give you that answer, you're exponentially dumber than the 'dumbfuck' on youtube who says it's probably not a good idea to inject aluminum.
Im pretty sure it was liberals who were trying to change the smoking laws and following the long existing/better emerging science that smoking was bad.

It was the tobacco companies who paid for bad studies for decades and more conservatives that were fine with keeping it as it was.
 
Liberals suffer from a lack of cognitive dissonance resolution. Meaning you hear something from authority, fully believe it, then it gets disproven and you completely shelf the fact that it was disproven so you're fresh to believe in the next line of bullshit.

Medical doctors and scientists told us smoking was not harmful. They told us Oxycontin was not addictive. They told us to eat 6-11 servings of carbs per day. They told us dousing our food in Round Up was perfectly fine for us. They completely lied about all sorts of COVID information.

Yet here you stand, ready to believe yet another line of their bullshit.

Try using your own common sense. Does injecting aluminum into the human body seem like a good or a bad thing? If you need a doctor to give you that answer, you're exponentially dumber than the 'dumbfuck' on youtube who says it's probably not a good idea to inject aluminum.

If I were to spread a can of coke across a football field, would you consider that football field doused with coke?
 
Im pretty sure it was liberals who were trying to change the smoking laws and following the long existing/better emerging science that smoking was bad.

It was the tobacco companies who paid for bad studies for decades and more conservatives that were fine with keeping it as it was.

The liberals and conservatives of yesteryear and the liberals and conservatives of today are and were entirely different. Basically flip flopped for the most part.

I've said it a million times. There is no truth seeking subset of the scientific community that gets funded to just merely seek out what is true and what isn't. They are funded by people and corporations that are looking to find a specific answer to boost their bottom line. If you think that studies are only done in a truthful manner these days, you are naive and suffer from what I explained in the post above.

Use common sense. Should you be injecting aluminum into your body or not? Answer is pretty fucking simple from where I stand. Is it not so simple from where you stand?
 
If I were to spread a can of coke across a football field, would you consider that football field doused with coke?

Doesn't it feel weird to have a knee jerk reaction to someone saying we shouldn't be eating Round Up?

You guys have completely lost all common sense.

I can't even imagine where your headspace is at to read someone saying we shouldn't be eating Round Up and the first thing that comes to mind is the need to defend and minimize it with a false representation of what is happening to our food. We have skyrocketing cases of cancer because of the chemicals and processes used in our food and you ignore all that so you can knee jerk defend having Round Up sprayed on your food. The Europeans don't allow their food to get poisoned like ours for a reason.

So fucking weird to defend that.
 
Doesn't it feel weird to have a knee jerk reaction to someone saying we shouldn't be eating Round Up?

You guys have completely lost all common sense.

I can't even imagine where your headspace is at to read someone saying we shouldn't be eating Round Up and the first thing that comes to mind is the need to defend and minimize it with a false representation of what is happening to our food. We have skyrocketing cases of cancer because of the chemicals and processes used in our food and you ignore all that so you can knee jerk defend having Round Up sprayed on your food. The Europeans don't allow their food to get poisoned like ours for a reason.

So fucking weird to defend that.

Isn’t it weird that you didn’t answer my question?
 
Back
Top