• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Opinion RFK calls for retraction of Danish vaccine study

The US is free of polio because of the vaccine!

Source for 288 getting it from the vaccine? I believe it was the sugar pills in the 50’s that carried the live polio virus but that’s no longer the case.

Typically when this happens, it is because someone came into contact with recently vaccinated person who is shedding the virus at the time, and I believe this only happens at a rate of like 1 in 2.7 million people. It isn’t very accurate if someone paints this as being “worse” than the new cases of polio, which are so low anyhow because the vaccine exists.
@Rob Battisti
 
Yes I will admit that, do you admit that it's not the element that matters, but how it behaves in the compound?


Diet is the main exposure route to metals [4]. Aluminium is found in different drinks and foods such as drinking water, where it is added as a flocculant (aluminium sulphate, Al2(SO4)3), processed foods, where it is used as an additive and as a result of the packaging used and even in fresh foods such as vegetables and fruit because of the Al contained in the soils [5].

 
You kept say Aluminum is being injected in to the bloodstream. I corrected you and said that it's not Aluminum, it's an Aluminum salt compound.
I mean to say the adjuvant, which I believe i said in atleast 1 response, not elemental aluminum to be clear. Still though does that change the core argument?
 
You kept say Aluminum is being injected in to the bloodstream. I corrected you and said that it's not Aluminum, it's an Aluminum salt compound.
I went back to the original point you responded and I explicitly said "The adjuvants persist.." which is Aluminum Salts. I recognize Aluminum is not whats being injected but the adjuvants. Both the Aluminum Salts and aluminum compounds in food release ions in the body. The argument was about the amount and how long it stays in the body. This is what you have pivoted away from.
 
“The people I know”

99 people contracted wild polio GLOBALLY last year.

Coincidentally, 288 got it from the vaccine.

The US has been polio free since 1979. Who the hell do you know who has polio?
They obviously did NOT contract it LAST YEAR you muppet.


Similar to how measles is making a comeback thanks to your brand of "critical thinking" polio could/would do the same, and the consequences of such would be devastating. RFK is NOT a scientist, he's barely a functional adult, so if you are in alignment with him, chances are high that you are, in fact, a numbnut.
 
They obviously did NOT contract it LAST YEAR you muppet.


Similar to how measles is making a comeback thanks to your brand of "critical thinking" polio could/would do the same, and the consequences of such would be devastating. RFK is NOT a scientist, he's barely a functional adult, so if you are in alignment with him, chances are high that you are, in fact, a numbnut.
Don't forget he specifically said people shouldn't take medical advice from him, while under oath.
 
Last edited:
Wait so you completely have pivoted from my original argument, from ingestion vs injection. Two red herrings in a row.
You haven't made an argument. Your arguments are conjecture. Probably don't know the difference.

Making an argument means providing evidence to prove your assertion.

You haven't done that. Not once.
 
W
You haven't made an argument. Your arguments are conjecture. Probably don't know the difference.

Making an argument means providing evidence to prove your assertion.

You haven't done that. Not once.
What have I said thats factually incorrect regarding injection vs ingestion? Sorry I havent formulized everything properly on an mma forum. This should be easy for you to point to right?
 
You haven't made an argument. Your arguments are conjecture. Probably don't know the difference.

Making an argument means providing evidence to prove your assertion.

You haven't done that. Not once.
This is also ironic because you dont even know what an argument is or isnt. Making an argument requires premises that are followed by a conclusion as a basic syllogism, not all arguments are evidential or necessarily require evidence to be logically sound. Also what I said isnt conjecture, its pretty well understood and not even contraversial.
 
I went back to the original point you responded and I explicitly said "The adjuvants persist.." which is Aluminum Salts. I recognize Aluminum is not whats being injected but the adjuvants. Both the Aluminum Salts and aluminum compounds in food release ions in the body. The argument was about the amount and how long it stays in the body. This is what you have pivoted away from.

Then I misread it, and I'm willing to continue. Yes the adjuvant stays longer in the body, and they are intended to do so to give the immune system a prolonged exposure. What is the issue with this?
 
Then I misread it, and I'm willing to continue. Yes the adjuvant stays longer in the body, and they are intended to do so to give the immune system a prolonged exposure. What is the issue with this?
My main issue with this is that infants and babies immune systems are still developing at this point and we know theyre less equipped to deal with some of the inflamation responses, and the possibility, since there is longer retention for it to spread and accumulate on different tissues and areas of the body, is also troubling to me.
 
Back
Top