• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Opinion RFK calls for retraction of Danish vaccine study

If the concern is aluminum, are we going to enhance the regulation of aluminum in foods and supplements?

I don't see RFK jr saying shit about the FDA and EPA doing a better job of regulating and cleaning up lead and arsenic in drinking water, or holding corporate polluters who aren't vaccine manufacturers responsible.
 
Last edited:
They bear the burden but dont meet the standards sufficient for any mandate or any high degree of confidence, just epistemically. We can build an evidence base but we have to be brutally honest on the limitations which no on is. So in the Biology example, we know Biology is a complex system and an open system, that means millions of variables. We see the issue but we dont actually take it into seriously.

What is the degree of confidence needed for anything in the field of biology to be implemented on the public? We are not going to get 5 Sigma in Biology.

So when we get to this specific study and we see the flaws but we still see the way its spoke about and the conclusions taken from it, we have to be percise.

We cant say that from this study its justified to conclude aluminum in vaccines cause no harm. When causality wasnt even determined or looked at.

The study doesn't claim that aluminum is completely harmless in every way. What it is saying is that in their dataset there was no statistical significant association found between Aluminum and certain disorders. Now why is that an issue for you?
 
So the respomse is that its not bad because the poisoning is ubiquitous and continues?
So, you think babies should not eat during the first 6 months if life? <lmao>


Is there any difference between subcutaneous injection and digestion in the relation to holding on to aluminum or it passing between the brain barrier?
Maybe you should go and see if you can find some evidence. Good luck with that.

"Given the quantities of aluminum we are exposed to on a daily basis, the quantity of aluminum in vaccines is miniscule. Aluminum-containing vaccines have been used for decades and have been given to more than 1 billion people without problem. In spring 2000, the National Vaccine Program Office (NVPO) reviewed aluminum exposure through vaccines and determined that no changes to vaccine recommendations were needed based on aluminum content. The Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety, part of the World Health Organization (WHO), has also reviewed studies and found no evidence of health risks that would require changes to vaccine policy."
 
How the fuck did that Nepo baby career fuck up RFK Jr became the face of MAGA science.

3xcdrvn9uukd1.jpeg
 
So, you think babies should not eat during the first 6 months if life? <lmao>



Maybe you should go and see if you can find some evidence. Good luck with that.

"Given the quantities of aluminum we are exposed to on a daily basis, the quantity of aluminum in vaccines is miniscule. Aluminum-containing vaccines have been used for decades and have been given to more than 1 billion people without problem. In spring 2000, the National Vaccine Program Office (NVPO) reviewed aluminum exposure through vaccines and determined that no changes to vaccine recommendations were needed based on aluminum content. The Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety, part of the World Health Organization (WHO), has also reviewed studies and found no evidence of health risks that would require changes to vaccine policy."
Yeah so you’re not arguing that there could be differences between subcutaneous injection and ingestion just that you don’t know and don’t like that people think it could be an issue
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Cid
Yeah so you’re not arguing that there could be differences between subcutaneous injection and ingestion just that you don’t know and don’t like that people think it could be an issue
Seems to me that doubts based on specious reasoning shouldn't be directing our national health policy, particularly when it comes to vaccine science. Furthermore, the doubt isn't even the issue, but rather partisan politics and intellectually arrogant conspiracy brain rot.
 
Seems to me that doubts based on specious reasoning shouldn't be directing our national health policy, particularly when it comes to vaccine science. Furthermore, the doubt isn't even the issue, but rather partisan politics and intellectually arrogant conspiracy brain rot.
This concern is based on the study
 
History shows that medical consensus can be and has been wrong. Think of things like leaded gasoline, asbestos, or tobacco.

Its reasonable to call for extra scrutiny when aluminum is repeatedly injected into infants during critical stages of brain development. Research in this field often ties back to institutions invested in current vaccine schedules, which can influence study design and conclusions. Apparently let’s all just trust big pharma implicitly.

This study lacked a true unvaccinated control group, limiting its ability to rule out subtle or long-term effects. It’s sensible to thoroughly investigate and explore safer alternatives, especially since the cost of caution is minimal compared to the potential harm of overlooking a real health risk.

Instead just keep calling people VaxTards while injecting 24 hour old babies with HepB vaccines.
 
Yeah so you’re not arguing that there could be differences between subcutaneous injection and ingestion just that you don’t know and don’t like that people think it could be an issue
Your reasoning is shitty*. You're making the claim that it could be an issue. Show me evidence for it being an issue and we can talk about the evidence, not this "well it could be so n'yaaaaa" bullshit.

*edit: pardon me, specious :D

Credit to @Limbo Pete.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top