• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Opinion RFK calls for retraction of Danish vaccine study

Voodoo_Child906

Silver Belt
@Silver
Joined
Mar 27, 2004
Messages
10,128
Reaction score
4,927
https://www.reuters.com/business/he...call-for-retraction-vaccine-study-2025-08-11/

Danish study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine that found no increased health risks from aluminum ingredients in childhood vaccines. The study analyzed data from over 1.2 million children across two decades and concluded that aluminum exposure from vaccines was not linked to autoimmune, allergic, or neurodevelopmental disorders.

RFK called this study “a deceitful propaganda stunt by the pharmaceutical industry,” alleging that the researchers deliberately designed the study to avoid finding harm. It seems like he came to this conclusion on his own, without guidance/advice from any US medical board.

The journal’s editor-in-chief, Dr. Christine Laine, rejected Kennedy’s request, stating there was no evidence of scientific misconduct and that the study’s limitations did not invalidate its findings. She emphasized the study’s robust methodology and large dataset.

alone-bitcoin.gif
 
There is a clear methodology issue with this study.

This study does not include a truly unvaccinated control group, which limits its ability to completely rule out possible harms from aluminum additives. There is evidence to suggest aluminum builds up in the body and cross into the brain, creating big concerns about repeated exposure during early childhood. We need to be skeptical here.

RFK bless
 
There is a clear methodology issue with this study.

This study does not include a truly unvaccinated control group, which limits its ability to completely rule out possible harms from aluminum additives. There is evidence to suggest aluminum builds up in the body and cross into the brain, creating big concerns about repeated exposure during early childhood. We need to be skeptical here.

RFK bless
I still think the study is valid, the findings are encouraging. Maybe not perfect but it's good evidence.

Have you known anyone who had polio? The people that I know who had it are all big vaccine supporters.
 
Pretty much anything that comes out of RFK’s mouth is “a deceitful propaganda stunt.”
The guy is an absolute bottom-of-the barrel scumbag of a person.
 
Reminder: RFK and his brain worm published "The MAHA Report," which was commissioned by the Trump admin. In addition to misrepresenting research, the report contained citations to studies that just simply didn't exist. They made them up. It's very likely something like CHAT GPT was used (just like the formula for the tariffs).
 
I still think the study is valid, the findings are encouraging. Maybe not perfect but it's good evidence.

Have you known anyone who had polio? The people that I know who had it are all big vaccine supporters.
“The people I know”

99 people contracted wild polio GLOBALLY last year.

Coincidentally, 288 got it from the vaccine.

The US has been polio free since 1979. Who the hell do you know who has polio?
 
There is a clear methodology issue with this study.

This study does not include a truly unvaccinated control group, which limits its ability to completely rule out possible harms from aluminum additives. There is evidence to suggest aluminum builds up in the body and cross into the brain, creating big concerns about repeated exposure during early childhood. We need to be skeptical here.

RFK bless

Skepticism is always a good practice. Are you skeptical of RFK and his knowledge on this subject?
 
I still think the study is valid, the findings are encouraging. Maybe not perfect but it's good evidence.

Have you known anyone who had polio? The people that I know who had it are all big vaccine supporters.
Can you elaborate as to why and as to why the concerns raised don't seem about this study don't bother you or why they are incorrect ?
 
Can you elaborate as to why and as to why the concerns raised don't seem about this study don't bother you or why they are incorrect ?
The data collected is valid, they followed 1,200,000 children for 20 years and measured the affects of the vaccines. Maybe it's not everything you want in a study but that is certainly a large number of participants over a very long time.

Denmark has a high vaccination rate so they don't have a lot of unvaxxed people to study. This doesn't mean you can't analyze the population.

That's pretty easy to understand.
 
“The people I know”

99 people contracted wild polio GLOBALLY last year.

Coincidentally, 288 got it from the vaccine.

The US has been polio free since 1979. Who the hell do you know who has polio?
The US is free of polio because of the vaccine!

Source for 288 getting it from the vaccine? I believe it was the sugar pills in the 50’s that carried the live polio virus but that’s no longer the case.
 
The US is free of polio because of the vaccine!

Source for 288 getting it from the vaccine? I believe it was the sugar pills in the 50’s that carried the live polio virus but that’s no longer the case.
The figure of 288 circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 (cVDPV2) cases in 2024 comes from a World Health Organization (WHO) report cited in the provided search results. Specifically, the “Statement of the Thirty-ninth Meeting of the Polio IHR Emergency Committee” (dated August 13, 2024) states that in 2024, there were 72 confirmed cVDPV cases globally, of which 68 were cVDPV2, but this appears to be a partial count for the year up to July 2024. The full-year estimate of 288 cVDPV2 cases is derived from a combination of WHO and Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) data, as referenced in the broader context of the search results, particularly from the GPEI’s updates on polio cases for 2024.


The exact source for the 288 cVDPV2 cases is not explicitly detailed in a single document within the provided results, but it aligns with the GPEI’s “Polio this week” updates (as of August 6, 2024) and other WHO reports that track global cVDPV2 cases. These updates aggregate data from the WHO Polio Information System and Global Polio Laboratory Network, indicating 288 cVDPV2 cases for the full year of 2024, with specific breakdowns like 98 cases in Nigeria, 37 in Chad, and 43 in Yemen.
 
The US is free of polio because of the vaccine!

Source for 288 getting it from the vaccine? I believe it was the sugar pills in the 50’s that carried the live polio virus but that’s no longer the case.

The oral version which is a live virus can cause infection of the recipient and transmission to unvaccinated. In the US I believe only the IPV inactive polio vaccine is used and does not cause infection or transmission.


Vaccine-Derived Poliovirus

 
Ah Africa mainly. The oral vaccine that contains the live weakened virus isn’t used in countries where it’s been eradicated (vaccine bless). And they’re apparently trying to eliminate its use everywhere. Regardless, the polio vaccine has done exponentially more good than harm.
 
There is a clear methodology issue with this study.

This study does not include a truly unvaccinated control group, which limits its ability to completely rule out possible harms from aluminum additives. There is evidence to suggest aluminum builds up in the body and cross into the brain, creating big concerns about repeated exposure during early childhood. We need to be skeptical here.

RFK bless


Aluminum can only be put in vaccines for nefarious reasons.
 
He wants to figure out a better way to make vaccines that is a good thing . There is a huge problem on how reports, study groups and analyst is performed. The process needs a real change and to be more neutral.
 
Back
Top