"Revolution possible when whites become minority"

[WrestlinganJudo]

Yes but the Trans-Atlantic slave trade did that too on a larger scale. It also introduced modern weaponry to the continent and vastly altered the power balances of the time.

And the end of slavery gave way to the scramble for Africa. There's no question which civilization made a deeper mark.

The Romans, the Golden hoard, Persia or Arabs, as a % of the population? The spike that happened with the Atlantic slave trade I don't think was as large as it had been as a percentage of the population.

 

[TheGOD]

White America is truly beginning to swirl in a cesspool of delusion.

Whites should be chomping at the bit to become minorities.

Minorities live luxurious lives full of welfare, expensive cars, free college, free healthcare, saying the n-word, award ceremonies for them. It's great.

I, for one, would like to put the breaks on white genocide. Just a little bit though.

White genocide???? Jesus Christ! Haha!

 

[panamaican]

It's like all of you guys failed history class.

"During the Second World War, women proved that they could do "men's" work, and do it well. With men away to serve in the military and demands for war material increasing, manufacturing jobs opened up to women and upped their earning power. Yet women's employment was only encouraged as long as the war was on. Once the war was over, federal and civilian policies replaced women workers with men.'

You missed the key part of my post: After the war, women wanted to keep working.

That is what drove the creation of 2 income households. Women insisting that they wanted to be part of the workforce. Over time this led to an increase in the labor supply and more women choosing to remain in their professions after getting married. Fast forward 60 years and here we are.

The only way things could have been different is if society flat out made it illegal for women to work. That wasn't going to happen so every year saw more and more women pursue employment.

 

[TemujinKhan]

Honestly people who think like this are scary people, when a man thinks his back is against a wall with no recourse then he turns into an animal. It takes very little to set these types off, even though most of them have not seen true suffering, war, famine, real in your face racism, they feel entitled to fight their perceived enemies (basically all non-white males) with unrelenting force. A youtube video, a newspaper article, its enough to send these men into a violent stupor believing that their fellow brothers are plotting to kill them and exterminate their entire race.

You kill one of us, we will kill 10,000 of you and not feel an ounce of remorse, they will bomb you back to the stone age because they feel threatened by an imaginary force. Modern day white neo-conservatives and white nationalists are scary people, their is no temperament to their retribution. A people who believe they are being genocided will often engage in genocide themselves, they will easily rationalize it that it must be done. If these types of people gain power we are in for some dark times.

 

[Islam Imamate]

The Romans, the Golden hoard, Persia or Arabs, as a % of the population? The spike that happened with the Atlantic slave trade I don't think was as large as it had been as a percentage of the population.

Africa hardly changed much over the millennia, the geography makes it hard for something like a state to organize. Without something like a state to better organize people and trade the continent didn't really grow all that much. In fact the need for labor because of a chronic under-population problem is partly why slavery existed on the continent in the first place.

For a long time accessing the continent meant crossing the Sahara or traveling by sea to the Horn. When the Europeans came to Africa they had the boating technology to transport more slaves than would've been possible for the Romans and they also had the demand to motivate them to do it.

 

[WrestlinganJudo]

Africa hardly changed much over the millennia, the geography makes it hard for something like a state to organize. Without something like a state to better organize people and trade the continent didn't really grow all that much. In fact the need for labor because of a chronic under-population problem is partly why slavery existed on the continent in the first place.

For a long time accessing the continent meant crossing the Sahara or traveling by sea to the Horn. When the Europeans came to Africa they had the boating technology to transport more slaves than would've been possible for the Romans and they also had the demand to motivate them to do it.

I guess I had moved off of African slavery and to slavery as a whole but North Africans have been taking black slaves for a very long time. Egypt had black African slaves.

On the scale of things I am pretty sure slavery of all types was larger as in ancient times percentage wise than it was post Columbian.

 

[Islam Imamate]

I guess I had moved off of African slavery and to slavery as a whole but North Africans have been taking black slaves for a very long time. Egypt had black African slaves.

On the scale of things I am pretty sure slavery of all types was larger as in ancient times percentage wise than it was post Columbian.

That's not a crazy assumption but it assumes Africa's population grew at a comparable rate to the rest of the Old World but like I mentioned earlier that wasn't the case. Africa before the Europeans arrived had a chronic under-population problem because the geography did not lend itself to the sorts of practices and organization that allowed the civilizations of the Old World to grow and expand. And a lot of Old World civilizations couldn't really penetrate Africa deeply. The Europeans didn't until the scramble for Africa but their slave trade had reached Central Africa via the West African tribes who were armed with guns and slaving for the Trans-Atlantic slave trade.

 

[Factory]

BTW, the anti-white SJW thing is an american thing.

In Europe, being white or non-white isn't really on people's mind.

Yeah, I agree on that.

Personally I don´t really care, if they are black or white, but I care about their cultural background.

I don´t want an islamic Europe. I consider the Islam as the most aggressive and radical ideology in the world.

Islam in the majority = Dead culture, terror, persecution

 

[Space]

You missed the key part of my post: After the war, women wanted to keep working.

That is what drove the creation of 2 income households. Women insisting that they wanted to be part of the workforce. Over time this led to an increase in the labor supply and more women choosing to remain in their professions after getting married. Fast forward 60 years and here we are.

The only way things could have been different is if society flat out made it illegal for women to work. That wasn't going to happen so every year saw more and more women pursue employment.

Most women don't want to work. Would you? Again, a history lesson from PBS to dispel whatever you learned from your lesbian sociology teacher:

Domesticity and Money Pressures
"The reality of many middle- and aspiring middle-class families' finances didn't match their dreams. Many families wanted extra income -- and required a wife's earnings -- to afford the lifestyle they desired. Yet middle-class women felt the pressure of the culture telling them to stay home. Many also had little desire to work in the nine-to-five jobs open to them. They didn't want to be factory workers, secretaries, bookkeepers or department store salespeople in an increasingly bureaucratic, corporate workplace, which demanded that home and work life be clearly separated. InThe Organization Man, a best-selling book of the period, William Whyte, Jr. wrote that organization men "are the ones of our middle class who have left home, spiritually as well as physically, to take the vows of organization life." How could a woman reconcile the ideal of female domesticity and the desire to earn?"

I think America will become similar to Brazil demographically which isn;'t horrible.

A lot of tan bootylish girls down there.

Does that mean the national IQ will be at Brazil levels too?

 

[Lord_Impaler]

The muslim arabs moving to europe consider themselves as muslim arabs, they dont give a flying fuck about race and a supposed race brotherhood that is non-existant.

Again, this white brotherhood non-sense is just a modern fantasy of white americans.

Im pretty sure the Germans didnt considered the slavs and the jews as their brethen, neither did the Anglosaxons did to the Irish.

It's not a fantasy, it's the natural evolution of nationalism in the context of an increasingly global world, which has enormous numbers of highly mobile populations combined with the popular contemporary fantasy of multi-culturalism, and an openly anti-white atmosphere.

I'm not sure how to address the "white American" bit, it's simply wrong, there are large groups of ethnic Europeans, living in Europe, who criticize anti-white pop culture/academia/politics. Even whole political parties.

The notion is modern, post globalization, I agree with that.

 

[Rod1]

It's not a fantasy, it's the natural evolution of nationalism in the context of an increasingly global world, which has enormous numbers of highly mobile populations combined with the popular contemporary fantasy of multi-culturalism, and an openly anti-white atmosphere.

I'm not sure how to address the "white American" bit, it's simply wrong, there are large groups of ethnic Europeans, living in Europe, who criticize anti-white pop culture/academia/politics. Even whole political parties.

The notion is modern, post globalization, I agree with that.

They criticize the anti-nativist atmosphere.

Again, have you actually met integrated arabs? like Ralph Nader for example?

You wouldnt be able to tell Bashar al-Assad in the streets of France from a native frenchman, its not about race, its about culture and ethnic identity.

 

[RIPWarrior]

Honestly people who think like this are scary people, when a man thinks his back is against a wall with no recourse then he turns into an animal. It takes very little to set these types off, even though most of them have not seen true suffering, war, famine, real in your face racism, they feel entitled to fight their perceived enemies (basically all non-white males) with unrelenting force. A youtube video, a newspaper article, its enough to send these men into a violent stupor believing that their fellow brothers are plotting to kill them and exterminate their entire race.

You kill one of us, we will kill 10,000 of you and not feel an ounce of remorse, they will bomb you back to the stone age because they feel threatened by an imaginary force. Modern day white neo-conservatives and white nationalists are scary people, their is no temperament to their retribution. A people who believe they are being genocided will often engage in genocide themselves, they will easily rationalize it that it must be done. If these types of people gain power we are in for some dark times.

People that think like you are scary.

White people aren’t as stupid as you’re implying. Low birth rates, mass immigration, white guilt, feminism, other forms of brainwshing and hatred for white people will without a doubt remove whites from any targeted country overtime.

A homogeneous society is one that can be unified.

What is real in your face racism?

Plenty of white people get brutally raped and murdered every year by non whites. Where are the extermination camps?

You are a sick person. White people fought and died to end that kind of shit. Closing and securing borders and being very selective with who you let in does not mean extermination of non whites. Being against multiculturalism and diversification of everything white does not turn you into Hitler.

I think it would take many consecutive murders and serious terrorist attacks for there to be a forceful removal of people from a country.

 

[Lord_Impaler]

They criticize the anti-nativist atmosphere.

Again, have you actually met integrated arabs? like Ralph Nader for example?

You wouldnt be able to tell Bashar al-Assad in the streets of France from a native frenchman, its not about race, its about culture and ethnic identity.

Ya, I've met westernized arabs, so what?


Of course the group's are going to be concerned about their own neighborhoods, but they all also address the entire European people.

European politicians talking about immigration constantly reference the whole continent, there's the EU, etc..

Clearly there is a body politik in Europe, and it's because they're all......European, ethnically European.

Divorcing race and culture is unnecessary when it's unnecessary. Which is to say, the vast majority of Arabs coming to Europe are all of similar culture, very different and very incompatible with Europeans.

Of course it has to do with culture, which has to do with race.

You think if native Swedes combined their very different culture with the native French you'd get problems, lol.


Your response didn't have much to do with my original comment, which was, it's not a fantasy, it's real, and was predictable. It's happened more often then not when you poison a country or a people with multiculturalism.

 

[Rod1]

Ya, I've met westernized arabs, so what?


Of course the group's are going to be concerned about their own neighborhoods, but they all also address the entire European people.

European politicians talking about immigration constantly reference the whole continent, there's the EU, etc..

Clearly there is a body politik in Europe, and it's because they're all......European, ethnically European.

Divorcing race and culture is unnecessary when it's unnecessary. Which is to say, the vast majority of Arabs coming to Europe are all of similar culture, very different and very incompatible with Europeans.

Of course it has to do with culture, which has to do with race.

You think if native Swedes combined their very different culture with the native French you'd get problems, lol.


Your response didn't have much to do with my original comment, which was, it's not a fantasy, it's real, and was predictable. It's happened more often then not when you poison a country or a people with multiculturalism.

Race and culture are not intertwined, its perfectly normal to have countries with different races and one culture and one with one race and different cultures.

Just look at the Balkans, they are all Slavs and they all hate each others guts.

The original point is that europeans think of ethnicity, not race.

Muslims dont want to replace europeans with arabs, they simply want europeans to become muslim and adopt arab culture, thats the success of islamic cultural expansionism.

 

[Rex Kwon Do]

When the shithouse starts going down in flames, I'm moving to Iceland. Illegally if need be.

Just bringing me, my white woman, my white dog (srs), and my lute.

View media item 23765

 

[Space]

WTF is with this lute guy?

 

[Lord_Impaler]

Race and culture are not intertwined, its perfectly normal to have countries with different races and one culture and one with one race and different cultures.

Just look at the Balkans, they are all Slavs and they all hate each others guts.

The original point is that europeans think of ethnicity, not race.

Muslims dont want to replace europeans with arabs, they simply want europeans to become muslim and adopt arab culture, thats the success of islamic cultural expansionism.

All I was originally saying was that "white nationalism" is a linear and predictable evolution of nationalism in the context of globalism and anti-white sentiment.

And that anti-immigration groups, "alt-right" groups, "far right groups", etc., whether they be European or American, generally oppose the "Islamisation of the West", not just of their origin countries.

I'm not saying Europeans weren't traditionally nationalist.

As to the part about Yugoslavia, yes that was an issue of culture, independent of race.

But, generally, when you have one or more ethnic minorities in a a single country, they develop their own cultures, usually counter to the host culture. Ala black Americans, Muslim Europeans, etc.

 

[7437]

I know you are being sarcastic, but there is some truth to your sarcasm. What have women offered the society with their freedom outside of falling for pathetic marketing schemes and whining about their feelings? Women have brought us terrible things Lilith Fair, The View, 50 Shades of Grey, Twilight, Justin Bieber, #elbowgate, Feminism and more than likely a tyrannical Hillary Clinton presidency.

Lol, your wife makes you listen to justin beober and watch the view?

 

[Trotsky]

Yes, that's what it will take for a revolution in the United States.

Not stripping of labor rights.
Not busting of unions.
Not thousands being killed by police without oversight every year.
Not the biggest prison population in world history.
Not the defunding of mental health and the release of mental ill persons into homelessness, jail, or early death.
Not the redistribution of wealth to the top wrung of society.
Not the degradation of public roadways and infrastructure.
Not the falling behind of public education.
Not the highest cost of pharmaceuticals in the world.
Not the most expensive healthcare in the world.
Not Americans dying from preventable illness by the thousand.
Not the monopolization and propagandization of news media.
Not housing discrimination whereby minorities are pushed away into dilapidated hellscapes.
Not environmental discrimination whereby pollution disproportionately affects the black and poor.
Not environmental deregulation whereby future generations are saddled with strife.
Not water exploitation and privatization whereby limited remaining water supplies are drained away for profit.
Not the exploitation of foreign slave labor.
Not the senseless meddling and funding of overthrows in democratic regimes all over the globe.
Not the utter lack of proportional representation in pop culture.
Not the monopoly on the political system by two corporately funded private parties.
Not the allowance of private influence towards removing facts and science from academia.



No, less white people. That is what will finally cause a revolution.

 

[SouthoftheAndes]

Race and culture are not intertwined, its perfectly normal to have countries with different races and one culture and one with one race and different cultures.

Just look at the Balkans, they are all Slavs and they all hate each others guts.

The original point is that europeans think of ethnicity, not race.

Muslims dont want to replace europeans with arabs, they simply want europeans to become muslim and adopt arab culture, thats the success of islamic cultural expansionism.

This is largely true but they are NOT all Slavs

Romanians, Greeks, Albanians are not Slavs. And you have a diversity of "European-sub-races" among the Slavs in the Balkans. Even Dialet can differ. But yes overall with regards to the majority genetically Slavic populations in the Balkans they are more closely related to one another then say Romanians or Moldovans and yet they dislike each other.

Yugoslavia was a major failure obviously. But in a weird way it worked in holding the people bottled up and angry until freed they then exploded.