But as everything with Dana.. he only criticizes judges if it goes against his narrative.Dana's never been the guy who pretends judges get it right every time. I bet whoever replaces him in the future doesn't speak their mind like he does.
I mean.. there are like 5 good HWs and Volkov is one of them. It should not affect his ranking.Give him his win bonus and treat it as a win in general, done.
Unfortunately? this is one of the benefits of the UFC making their own decisions and not being subject to retarded judges being a benefit. Appeals to the commission are a waste of time.Unfortunately, the UFC can't treat it as a Volkov win because it'd then set a precedent anytime the judges fuck up in the future. Other fighters will use it as an example and ask for the same treatment.
Point is, if they pretend Volkov won and Gane lost, we'll get fighters complaining in the future anytime judges make a wrong call (whether too egregious or not) and ask for the same treatment.Unfortunately? this is one of the benefits of the UFC making their own decisions and not being subject to retarded judges being a benefit. Appeals to the commission are a waste of time.
They gave Aldo a title shot fight after "losing" to Moraes after that horrible decision. I'm sure it's happened other times.
No question that Volkov should get his win bonus.Cool. Did he give Volkov his win bonus?
Volkov +1200, Aspinall -2000, and that's being generous with Volkov's odds. His only path to victory would be Aspinall blowing out a knee on the way to touching gloves.Volkov should go directly to a title shot against aspinall, gane needs to rest and heal his injury, Volkov seems ok to go for the beginning or middle of 2025.
He’s probably the one behind it
Yeah lots of people who hate Dana, are going to be shocked when the corporate president comes and consults his PR team before saying anything. It'll be bland.I always appreciate Dana for speaking his mind, a more corporate CEO wouldn’t comment on something like this until he’s talked with all his corporate advisors before just going “they f*ucked you”
I mean Dana's not the most unbiased guy in the world. I'd rather know his opinion than anyone else that refuses to comment until forced. There's always going to be bias, it's only a matter if they cover it up or not.But as everything with Dana.. he only criticizes judges if it goes against his narrative.
Wait. What was he supposed to do? This doesn't mean shit. Did he get his win bonus? Will he get a proper match up?
Honestly, this really means nothing unless actions are set in place against it