International Republicans, do you want illegals processed into the country or to keep them out?

Well,

In the supposed plan, those Camps would be located on the other side of the boarder.

Not our problem after that…
They wont be, the private prison industry doesnt get to sell their labor cheaper for what they would themselves if they dont.

Private Prison stock skyrocketed since Trump became President Elect.
 
I want everyone that's illegally here and has no criminal background, doesn't commit any crimes and is excited to work and get their slice of the pie to stay and live to good life that we all get to enjoy. We also need to make legally immigrating here easier and secure the borders to keep out fentanyl, terrorists and undesirables.

Please vote for people who advocate for these two things. Not people who say they do and then votes against literally every bill designed to do those things.
 
Last edited:
Lol@everyone who says all these.administrative things need to be done who also votes for people who gut the resources to get these things done.

Also, the general tone of this thread:





Pic of all the black people who voted for Trump -

14790482471851.jpg
 
They wont be, the private prison industry doesnt get to sell their labor cheaper for what they would themselves if they dont.

Private Prison stock skyrocketed since Trump became President Elect.
See that’s the part of the story I am most curious about, for how long will the general public last watching it happen.

If this does happen and the camps are in murica. If only Criminals, I think some time. But when you start getting to working immigrants with families who do not look like MS13, I think that will rub the public the wrong way….I may be wrong
 
See that’s the part of the story I am most curious about, for how long will the general public last watching it happen.

If this does happen and the camps are in murica. If only Criminals, I think some time. But when you start getting to working immigrants with families who do not look like MS13, I think that will rub the public the wrong way….I may be wrong

Yeah I dont think anyone who voted for Trump will give a sh*t. The demonization of migrants is in full effect. They were ok with death traps in the Rio Grande, they will be ok with slave camps.
 
Last edited:
Please vote for people who advocate for these two things. Not people who say they do and then votes against literally every bill designed to do those things.

Immigration isn't a top 3 priority of mine so it doesn't play a major roll in decision making. That's just what I hope will happen regardless of who is in office. Neither party actually wants to fix immigration. That's why we're still talking about it since Reagan was in office. Because of this, "Every bill designed to do those things" has portions that are purposely included to to prevent them from being passed. The fact that you brought this up leaves me with two conclusions: You were either unaware that immigration bills are purposely designed to fail so that they can blame the opposing party for not passing them or you're just repeating partisan talking points. Lose/lose for you either.
 
If you had only these two options. The border bill that was put up awhile back would put more money into border agents to better "process" the illegals into the country. The republicans voted no on it.

the other option is to keep the illegals out. No getting processed into the country. They can wait at the mexico side of the border wall. They are not allowed it at all.

which of these two options do you want? Another poster on here is claiming that more money for hiring more border patrol, not to stop illegals from coming in, but more of them to "process" more illegals into the country. Which I dont believe is what Republicans want.

1. Keep them out, build that wall the democrats blocked.
2. Repeal criminal laws democrats put to remove voter ID. You need ID to buy alcohol, but not vote? Stop the democrat cheating.
3. Deport the illegals that came in illegally now.

All this can be done in 4 weeks.
 
If you had only these two options. The border bill that was put up awhile back would put more money into border agents to better "process" the illegals into the country. The republicans voted no on it.

the other option is to keep the illegals out. No getting processed into the country. They can wait at the mexico side of the border wall. They are not allowed it at all.

which of these two options do you want? Another poster on here is claiming that more money for hiring more border patrol, not to stop illegals from coming in, but more of them to "process" more illegals into the country. Which I dont believe is what Republicans want.
I'm ok with those that have known no other country but this one. The ones that grew up in another can go.
 
Immigration isn't a top 3 priority of mine so it doesn't play a major roll in decision making. That's just what I hope will happen regardless of who is in office. Neither party actually wants to fix immigration. That's why we're still talking about it since Reagan was in office. Because of this, "Every bill designed to do those things" has portions that are purposely included to to prevent them from being passed. The fact that you brought this up leaves me with two conclusions: You were either unaware that immigration bills are purposely designed to fail so that they can blame the opposing party for not passing them or you're just repeating partisan talking points. Lose/lose for you either.

No, this is a common narrative parroted primarily by Republicans since Reagan when confronted with their own blatant obstructionism. Even a Senator as partisan and gross as Ted Cruz couldnt elaborate on the "things in the bill" he voted against when it came to immigration reform, because the fact of the matter is that immigration isnt used as a political cudgel by both sides, it's used by one side and they hardly ever even read the bills before objecting to them on their face. The claim that every bill since Reagan was "designed to fail" is not only egregious bullsh*t, but it's just excusatory of partisan nonsense as Republicans constantly pack their own bills. Throwing stones while in glass houses isnt something you should be carrying water for.
 
I'm ok with those that have known no other country but this one. The ones that grew up in another can go.

Why is Nativism a means to gatekeep citizenship? Seems to make way more sense to just assess their recent criminal History vs productiveness within our society.
 
Why is Nativism a means to gatekeep citizenship? Seems to make way more sense to just assess their recent criminal History vs productiveness within our society.
I like immigrants from all over bud. Not just those that get here by land connection. There has to be some balance to it all. The line is long and there are many worse places than those in central and south america. My coworker is from India and they actually resist countries if we have a lot of immigrants from those (according to her) she may have to go back. Its all a balance
 
I like immigrants from all over bud. Not just those that get here by land connection. There has to be some balance to it all. The line is long and there are many worse places than those in central and south america. My coworker is from India and they actually resist countries if we have a lot of immigrants from those (according to her) she may have to go back. Its all a balance

Yeah but you didnt indicate much except for a separate class for those who have only known the US. That's what Nativism is. Those could be complete turds compared to ones who came here recently.
 
I like immigrants from all over bud. Not just those that get here by land connection. There has to be some balance to it all. The line is long and there are many worse places than those in central and south america. My coworker is from India and they actually resist countries if we have a lot of immigrants from those (according to her) she may have to go back. Its all a balance
We should prioritize without a doubt european immigration if we so need immigrants. Those were the origin and the ancestors of people who actually built this country.
And of course they assimilate so much better and quicker.
 
Yeah but you didnt indicate much except for a separate class for those who have only known the US. That's what Nativism is. Those could be complete turds compared to ones who came here recently.
Outside of criminality it's impossible to do. I just don't see how you go to a country you don't know. Obv a 70 yr old man who's been here 40-50 years may be similar. There has to be lines drawn bruh. I don't have the answer of where that line is which is why some just draw it as legal/illegal. My point was there are good peeps that have to go back (my coworker) who has her bachelor's in favor of others that came due to land connection. It doesn't make sense.
 
We should prioritize without a doubt european immigration if we so need immigrants. Those were the origin and the ancestors of people who actually built this country.
And of course they assimilate so much better and quicker.
I have worked with many from Japan to ethiopia. I'm good with most every country as long as they are productive and contributors. I just know they DO prioritize some like Nepal which has a lower representation than India. But I love other cultures and enjoy getting to know them which is why I've learned bits of many languages through friendships.
 
We should prioritize without a doubt european immigration if we so need immigrants. Those were the origin and the ancestors of people who actually built this country.
And of course they assimilate so much better and quicker.

Bro you really think Europeans trying to immigrate here? Basically every country of EU has a higher standard of living and healthcare. They think we're retards.
 
Back
Top