Republican on Killing Internet Privacy: "Nobody has to use the Internet"

It's unbelievable that anyone could support this. Allowing ISP to sell browsing history is basically turning stalking into a business. Republican voters rather pretend illegal immigrants picking their vegetables are a bigger affront.
 
Can't wait till the creator of CAH buys all these fucks browsing history and posts it
 
i kind of agree, people take this internet shit was too seriously.
 
Republicans are the biggest POS, in the world.


Defend this, right wing pussies...What happened to freedom?
You realize it's all the same regardless of being a republican or democrat right?

What you see on the media is just a dog and pony show meant to distract you and cause knee jerk reactions like yours.

At the end of the day if you pay any attention, both dems and reps meet behind closed doors and decide what to do next together. It's been this way for years. Your just falling for all the theatrics. Both of the political parties are shit and they do not have your best interest in mind period.
 
It's unbelievable that anyone could support this. Allowing ISP to sell browsing history is basically turning stalking into a business. Republican voters rather pretend illegal immigrants picking their vegetables are a bigger affront.
It's all part of the plan. Brother you know what time it is. Does any of this even surprise you?

YouTube is now forcefully shutting down a ton of right news, conservative bloggers, Christian bloggers, gun right activist bloggers and theory bloggers from their site. Censorship is in full swing and will only get worse as time goes. I actually think at some point the government is going to try and shut down the internet...for how long will be anyone's guess. But it is definitely coming.
 
LOL@any Trumpets who would come in here acting like they're upset.

You guys did this to us. You don't get to act like you're a part of the outrage. This is what you voted into office.
 
Like I said in another thread. Between this and net neutrality you have old fart white men who will sell out one of the most importsnt technological achievements for the younger generations.

These fucks will be dead soon enough but they will have sold out every younger person who will benefit most from this technology.
 
It's all part of the plan. Brother you know what time it is. Does any of this even surprise you?

YouTube is now forcefully shutting down a ton of right news, conservative bloggers, Christian bloggers, gun right activist bloggers and theory bloggers from their site. Censorship is in full swing and will only get worse as time goes. I actually think at some point the government is going to try and shut down the internet...for how long will be anyone's guess. But it is definitely coming.


The only way your last comment makes sense is if they shutdown the public information disimination portion of the internet and leave the shopping alone.
 
The only way your last comment makes sense is if they shutdown the public information disimination portion of the internet and leave the shopping alone.
Which is likely what will happen, especially if they manage to pull of a standard currency for the global system.
 
LOL@any Trumpets who would come in here acting like they're upset.

You guys did this to us. You don't get to act like you're a part of the outrage. This is what you voted into office.
You realize none of the shit that is happening would any different with Hillary.

Different face, same outcome. Trump is just a different personality accomplishing the same goals the establishment ultimately wants.

I suppose it just would of been more digestible for you if it was Hillary and not him?

It's all the same. We would be in the same position no matter who was sitting at the WH.
 
Never in history has there been a world as informed as it is now, and it's thanks to the internet.

For these type of people the informed and the knowledgeable are a threat to themselves and their friends. Fuck this pos and anyone else who thinks the same way.
 
You realize none of the shit that is happening would any different with Hillary.

Different face, same outcome. Trump is just a different personality accomplishing the same goals the establishment ultimately wants.

I suppose it just would of been more digestible for you if it was Hillary and not him?

It's all the same. We would be in the same position no matter who was sitting at the WH.


Is this how trumpmsupporters save face? By constantly spamming the idea that Clinton would've done the same thing?


Some cop out that's for sure.


Would Clinton have tried to repeal ACA with a healthcare plan that is worse than anything the country has ever seen? By your logic yes she woukd have even though she wouldn't have pushed for such a thing.
 
I'm actually surprised we don't have the free market crowd coming out in defense of this. "But the free market will provide ISP's that don't sell browser history and they will be what everyone chooses, even if they cost more, because people really value privacy and the free market provides what people want!" Isn't that how it's supposed to work my Libertarian friends?

Of course, that would rely on it being true that people *really* give a shit about their privacy when it comes down to putting their money where their mouths are rather than just virtue signalling every time it comes up. Frankly, as far as I'm concerned, the rise and popularity of Google and its business model has shown pretty clearly that people largely don't give a rat's ass about their online privacy as long as there is a free and tasty carrot dangled on the stick at the other end of their privacy being sold to the highest bidder. When it comes down to dollars and cents and actually putting in some effort/facing some inconvenience to protect one's online privacy people have largely shown they will take the more convenient, cheaper, less private option en masse. Those same people will suddenly become deathly concerned about privacy as soon as there is a headline about some bill being passed or backdoor discovered or blah blah blah - but their concern fades away in the face of a shiny new gadget or service.

I fully expect a mound of equivocations of "Oh, it's different! In this case I don't have a choice!" Again, if this is THAT important to people, won't there be ISP's using this as a selling feature since you all consider it so valuable? I mean, ISP's would be crazy not to market themselves as "the choice that respects your privacy - we don't sell browser history!" I mean, unless all of this histrionic pronouncements of disapproval I'm seeing right now is just a big show and when people actually have to pay a little more to keep their browser history hidden their values stop just shy of their wallets...

Just to be clear, I'd vastly prefer this wasn't happening. The reality is though most of the people who talk big on subjects like this have *long* shown they don't give a shit about their privacy if they are coaxed just a bit by a tasty carrot dangled in front of them. Our presented values in this area don't match how many of us actually act when it comes to preserving our privacy so I have trouble taking many of you seriously as you rail.
 
As long as they aren't giving out actual personal info, like with my name or identity attached, it's little more than just slightly strange .

The results indicate that Web browsing histories, which can be obtained by a variety of known techniques, may be used to divulge personal preferences and interests to Web authors; as such, browsing history data can be considered similar to a biometric fingerprint. Since Web histories are largely unique to person and, as shown, stable over time in some of the cases, they can be understood as an identifier and potentially be used to strengthening of tracking, in addition to revealing information about a particular user’s browsing interests.


http://petsymposium.org/2012/papers/hotpets12-4-johnny.pdf
 
Is this how trumpmsupporters save face? By constantly spamming the idea that Clinton would've done the same thing?


Some cop out that's for sure.


Would Clinton have tried to repeal ACA with a healthcare plan that is worse than anything the country has ever seen? By your logic yes she woukd have even though she wouldn't have pushed for such a thing.
Stop looking at the obvious side dishes that are meant to distract you from what's really going on.

And for the last time, neither Hillary or Trump was someone I supported. I wanted Carson.

Getting back to the point. Nothing would be different in regards to our freedoms and foreign objectives. The whole Obama care and health care system debates is meant to take your eyes off the fact that shit like what this op is stating is taking place.

Also think about this for one second smart guy. N. Korea has no centralized bank system..... hmmm ain't that a bitch. No wonder where at the present situation we are with them now huh.
 
Also think about this for one second smart guy. N. Korea has no centralized bank system..... hmmm ain't that a bitch. No wonder where at the present situation we are with them now huh.
Could you explain this a bit more? I'm interested but not connecting the dots.
 
Stop looking at the obvious side dishes that are meant to distract you from what's really going on.

And for the last time, neither Hillary or Trump was someone I supported. I wanted Carson.

Getting back to the point. Nothing would be different in regards to our freedoms and foreign objectives. The whole Obama care and health care system debates is meant to take your eyes off the fact that shit like what this op is stating is taking place.

Also think about this for one second smart guy. N. Korea has no centralized bank system..... hmmm ain't that a bitch. No wonder where at the present situation we are with them now huh.


So you have no clue what you're talking about.

Fundamental difference between Clinton and trump on healthcare lien many other policies.
 
Could you explain this a bit more? I'm interested but not connecting the dots.
They are not under the influence of world banking systems. Our federal bank reserve system is connected with the IMF and other global / world bank systems.

Meaning that their currency is outside of external influences. N. Korea currency system is home grown and maintained. Guess who else was the same and are now gone, Iraq, Syria, Libya and Sudan. Look at those countries now. Chaos or puppet states.

Guess who's left besides N. Korea....Cuba, Iran, Russia and China. Though recently the imf recently added china to its list of backed currencies. China still isn't entirely onboard with their definace of being able to switch to a gold standard.

Guess who are the two biggest buyers of gold this past decade. Russia and china.
 
Back
Top